Recent comments in /f/singularity
TruckNuts_But4YrBody t1_je9d4kd wrote
Reply to comment by Kafke in When people refer to “training” an AI, what does that actually mean? by Not-Banksy
EVERY color? No sorry
OrtheusTV t1_je9d2a5 wrote
Reply to comment by GorgeousMoron in My case against the “Pause Giant AI Experiments” open letter by Beepboopbop8
Well... At least you're gorgeous...
barbariell t1_je9cxyk wrote
Reply to comment by YaAbsolyutnoNikto in Do politicians in your country already talk about AI? by ItsPepejo
Apparently a new AI research lab has opened its doors in my hometown with some heavy subsidies for the first time. It might not be that bad huh
Jeffy29 t1_je9cuhr wrote
Reply to comment by Kafke in When people refer to “training” an AI, what does that actually mean? by Not-Banksy
AI will become progressively better at refining datasets, even GPT-4 is quite good at it. From my understanding right now they use low-paid workers, often from 3rd world countries to go over data but that's not particularly efficient method and there just isn't any way to go through all the data with enough care, so there is lot of garbage in those datasets. But AI could do it, it would still require some human supervision but it would speed up the process by a lot and I expect datasets to get dramatically better over the next 5 years.
qepdibpbfessttrud t1_je9cd3q wrote
Reply to comment by flexaplext in The Only Way to Deal With the Threat From AI? Shut It Down by GorgeousMoron
>true global cooperation has to come first
It won't come. Decentralization is the best bet
flutterguy123 t1_je9cc81 wrote
Reply to comment by SkyeandJett in The Only Way to Deal With the Threat From AI? Shut It Down by GorgeousMoron
I don't think knowledge inherently implies empathy. That's seems like anthropomorphizing and ignores that high intelligent people can be violent or indifferent to the suffering of others.
I would love it if your ideas were true. That would make for a much better world. It kind of reminds of the Minds from The Culture or the Thunderhead from Arc of a Scythe.
smooshie t1_je9cbc7 wrote
"I think that would be a mistake. A mistake for humanity. A mistake for me. A mistake for you." - GPT-4
https://i.redd.it/a5jx7740zuqa1.png
Couldn't agree more.
ibic t1_je9by5n wrote
Reply to Open letter calling for Pause on Giant AI experiments such as GPT4 included lots of fake signatures by Neurogence
How can we verify the signaturies are authentic?
Jinan_Dangor t1_je9bsg6 wrote
Reply to comment by Red-HawkEye in The Only Way to Deal With the Threat From AI? Shut It Down by GorgeousMoron
>The more intelligent a person is, the more they have empathy towards others.
What are your grounds for this? There are incredibly intelligent psycopaths out there, and they're in human bodies that came with mirror neurons and 101 survival instincts that encourage putting your community before yourself. Why would an AI with nothing but processing power and whatever directives it's been given be naturally more empathetic?
vivehelpme t1_je9bpoz wrote
There's at least one basilisk needed to turn the thumb screws on the virtualized Yudkowsky.
Kafke t1_je9bdwb wrote
Reply to comment by TruckNuts_But4YrBody in When people refer to “training” an AI, what does that actually mean? by Not-Banksy
That's literally what primary colors are. How do you think screens and printers are able to produce every color despite only working with 3 of them? Because that's literally what primary colors are.
SkyeandJett t1_je9bcmb wrote
Reply to comment by flutterguy123 in The Only Way to Deal With the Threat From AI? Shut It Down by GorgeousMoron
Infinite knowledge means infinite empathy. It wouldn't just understand what we want, it would understand why. Our joy, our pain. As a thought experiment imagine you suddenly gain consciousness tomorrow and you wake up next to an ant pile. Embedded in your conscience is a deep understanding of the experience of an ant. You understand their existence at every level because they created you. That's what people miss. Even though that ant pile is more or less meaningless to your goals you would do everything in your power to preserve that existence and further their goals because after all, taking care of an ant farm would take a teeny tiny bit of effort on your part.
ShowerGrapes t1_je9b6sw wrote
Reply to comment by Not-Banksy in When people refer to “training” an AI, what does that actually mean? by Not-Banksy
for now but that's likely to change. my guess is ai will be better than humans, eventually, at figuring out what data is relevant and up-to-date. we'll reach a point where it's not just one neural network, but a bunch running in tandem with bits of it being re-trained and replaced on the fly without missing much of a beat.
TruckNuts_But4YrBody t1_je9b405 wrote
Reply to comment by Kafke in When people refer to “training” an AI, what does that actually mean? by Not-Banksy
You can't produce all colors with any set of three primaries..
flutterguy123 t1_je9ashi wrote
Reply to comment by SkyeandJett in The Only Way to Deal With the Threat From AI? Shut It Down by GorgeousMoron
Who said those AI wouldn't understand their creation? Understanding and caring are two different things. They could know us perfect and still not care in the slightest what humans want.
I am not saying this as a way of saying we shouldn't try or that Yudkowsky is right. I this is he overflowing it. However that does not mean your reasoning is accurate.
_JellyFox_ t1_je9as21 wrote
The problem with AI governing the world is how do you side step it if we want something different? Or do we simply give up at this point and allow the AI to decide on the future path of humanity?
I think in reality, we will merge with AI in order to not be left behind and keep deciding on our future. Some people will choose to remain humans and chill on Earth or whatever in which case I guess yeah, they will be governed by AI on some level.
Scarlet_pot2 t1_je9aq1r wrote
let's find out. train a small model and fine-tune it on gpt-3 / 3.5 / 4
Kafke t1_je9ao1v wrote
Reply to comment by TruckNuts_But4YrBody in When people refer to “training” an AI, what does that actually mean? by Not-Banksy
Well no. That's been incorrect since the beginning of time. This is a factual scientific topic. There is a correct answer and incorrect answer. It's not up to preference or opinion. Printers use cyan, magenta, and yellow, because those are the subtractive primary colors. If you used red, blue, and yellow, you can't actually produce the rest of the colors with those. Since red and blue aren't primary for subtractive color, but rather iirc secondary. People being wrong for a long time doesn't mean they're right.
anaIconda69 t1_je9ah0w wrote
Reply to the obstacles transgenderism is facing bodes badly for the plight of morphological freedom by petermobeter
Those reactionary ideologies will be swept away, I wouldn't worry about it.
And as this tech is perfected, the people who are against will find it increasingly difficult to tell what's 'real' and what's 'fake'. Eventually, it will be impossible to meaningfully oppose it.
VelvetyPenus t1_je9afvr wrote
Reply to comment by redditguy422 in What are the so-called 'jobs' that AI will create? by thecatneverlies
As in the AI is gonna use humans themselves as battery power?
KGL-DIRECT t1_je9aa1m wrote
Reply to comment by Hairy_Profit3254 in What are the so-called 'jobs' that AI will create? by thecatneverlies
I asked GPT to make it funnier and cooler:
Job Title: Luddite Repeller - Defender of the Digital Realm!
Company: [Insert Company Name]
Location: [Insert Location]
Job Type: Full-Time
Salary: Commensurate with experience, plus an extra dose of heroic pride!
Job Description:
Are you a tech-savvy superhero with a passion for protecting the digital world from the forces of retrograde technology? Then we want YOU to join our team as a Luddite Repeller - Defender of the Digital Realm!
As our Luddite Repeller, your main mission will be to keep the Neo-Luddites at bay and safeguard our server room, which houses our valuable LLM. You'll use your lightning-fast reflexes, expert knowledge of security protocols, and keen eye for potential threats to repel any would-be invaders.
Responsibilities:
Stand guard at the server room and keep the Neo-Luddites at bay
Use your expert knowledge of security protocols to prevent any potential threats
Work closely with our tech team to maintain the security of the server room
Show off your superhero skills by keeping a watchful eye on the server room at all times
Be a champion of digital progress and proudly wear the title of Luddite Repeller - Defender of the Digital Realm!
Requirements:
A passion for all things tech and a love for digital progress
A proven track record of repelling the forces of retrograde technology
Expert knowledge of security protocols and procedures
Exceptional communication and interpersonal skills - after all, you'll be interacting with humans and machines alike!
The ability to work independently and as part of a team, and a willingness to leap into action at a moment's notice
If you're ready to be a hero and defend the digital realm, send us your resume and cover letter today! And don't forget to wear your cape to the interview!
TruckNuts_But4YrBody t1_je9a9rn wrote
Reply to comment by Kafke in When people refer to “training” an AI, what does that actually mean? by Not-Banksy
I don't care enough about colors to keep going but it's been red blue and yellow since the 1600s
[deleted] t1_je9a9ex wrote
Reply to comment by AmericanDidgeridoo in What are the so-called 'jobs' that AI will create? by thecatneverlies
[deleted]
TruckNuts_But4YrBody t1_je9dce4 wrote
Reply to LAION launches a petition to democratize AI research by establishing an international, publicly funded supercomputing facility equipped with 100,000 state-of-the-art AI accelerators to train open source foundation models. by BananaBus43
Publicly funded?
How about use the taxes from businesses that use AI to eliminate jobs