Recent comments in /f/singularity
[deleted] t1_jedps32 wrote
Reply to comment by marvinthedog in Superior beings. by aksh951357
[removed]
BigZaddyZ3 t1_jedpqvx wrote
Reply to comment by marvinthedog in Superior beings. by aksh951357
I think they mean “man becomes the machine” basically.
_dekappatated t1_jedpp0y wrote
Reply to comment by visarga in Goddamn it's really happening by BreadManToast
I agree partially, but I'm sure we've barely scratched the surface on what is possible with the knowledge that we already have and has already been proven by scientists. They might come up with novel solutions that are more or less correct that don't need extensive real world testing and be able to change the world very quickly that way. There are mathematicians who's work is entirely theoretical and haven't been applied to the real world, then suddenly a use is found for their stuff 30-50 years later.
chlebseby t1_jedpm3y wrote
Reply to comment by czk_21 in What were the reactions of your friends when you showed them GPT-4 (The ones who were stuck from 2019, and had no idea about this technological leap been developed) Share your stories below ! by Red-HawkEye
I mean they do the same job, technology just changes some details of their life. Life itself in 1990 wasn't that different if you think about it. Same sociopolitical system, same goals in life.
And yes, this time change will be bigger, as system and life itself will be altered.
CertainMiddle2382 t1_jedpjkw wrote
Reply to comment by TallOutside6418 in Pausing AI Developments Isn't Enough. We Need to Shut it All Down by Eliezer Yudkowsky by Darustc4
People have to understand the dire state our planet is in.
There is little chance we can make it through the 22nd century in a decent state.
The cock is ticking…
marvinthedog t1_jedp9cw wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in Superior beings. by aksh951357
What do you mean?
Ginger987 t1_jedp3nm wrote
My better half is a marketing manager for a s&p100 company and has a 8 figure marketing budget.
Big companies like that tend to outsource a vast amount of the actual marketing work to agencies. (copywriting, data acquisition/analysis, digital ads, print media ads etc etc.) essentially all content generation.
Her LinkedIn is therefore packed with dozens of these agencies and hundreds of individuals from the higher-cost end of that industry. There have definitely been some redundancies but at the moment its more like freelance contracts arent being renewed, recruitment is paused and there is vastly less work to do.
These people are obviously vocally uneasy about even thier short term futures though.
[deleted] t1_jedp2k9 wrote
Reply to comment by marvinthedog in Superior beings. by aksh951357
[deleted]
marvinthedog t1_jedp0uc wrote
Reply to Superior beings. by aksh951357
We can´t rule out that the superior beings wont be conscious. They might do amazing things with the universe but if "there is nobody home" these amazing things would just be a play for empty benches.
sneakpeekbot t1_jedoo1q wrote
Reply to comment by sequoia-3 in Ray Kurzweil Predicted Simulated Biology is a Path to Longevity Escape Velocity by Dr_Singularity
Here's a sneak peek of /r/longevity using the top posts of the year!
#1: Saudi Arabia plans to spend $1 billion a year discovering treatments to slow aging | 199 comments
#2: MicroRNA regrows 90% of lost hair, study finds | 77 comments
#3: Third patient is CURED of HIV with stem cell therapy ‘Düsseldorf patient' now virus-free and Cancer free. | 34 comments
^^I'm ^^a ^^bot, ^^beep ^^boop ^^| ^^Downvote ^^to ^^remove ^^| ^^Contact ^^| ^^Info ^^| ^^Opt-out ^^| ^^GitHub
sequoia-3 t1_jedonfr wrote
Reply to comment by systranerror in Ray Kurzweil Predicted Simulated Biology is a Path to Longevity Escape Velocity by Dr_Singularity
The examples he might be using will be outdated, however, his framework around AI and the definition of AGI versus Singularity are still very relevant.
I would suggest that people interested do some research on Peter Diamandis (in the end both established the Singularity University).
Peter's book - The Future Is Faster Than You Think: How Converging Technologies Are Disrupting Business, Industries, and Our Lives is a good one. He has a podcast interviewing business leaders in the industry. He is very into the Longevity topic. This is another area that is exploding which so few people are aware of. (check out r/longevity)
David Sinclair is a must-follow on this subject, check out his podcast to get started. He is really into something. (as well as many other researchers as well of course)
Ghost-Coyote t1_jedo3o3 wrote
Reply to comment by electroninmotion in Goddamn it's really happening by BreadManToast
Next step garlic cheese bread with herbs.
Professional_Copy587 t1_jedo32c wrote
Reply to comment by seas2699 in Goddamn it's really happening by BreadManToast
Ok, disregard his view. Go look at the majority of the views of the rest of the experts. They arent proclaiming this the start of the birth of AGI, ASI and the singularity like this sub is now doing on a daily basis. They are pretty clear that generative AI is a very transformative technology but it is NOT AGI. Nor do we have have any reason to think its close. Most estimates (guesses) are still 2030 or beyond
Sailorman2300 t1_jednzge wrote
Reply to AGI Ruin: A List of Lethalities by Eliezer Yudkowsky -- "We need to get alignment right on the first critical try" by Unfrozen__Caveman
The thing that got me thinking was when they started talking about machine time vs human time. If the human brain operates at 200Hz and has to sleep mode for 1/3 of the day every day and AI would run at gigahertz speeds 24/7 our reaction time if something does go sideways would be limited if we have any at all.
It feels like we're a bug confidently flying across the road to a big beautiful flower unaware of the oncoming windshield.
sequoia-3 t1_jednw9j wrote
Reply to comment by ITsupportSuperHero in Ray Kurzweil Predicted Simulated Biology is a Path to Longevity Escape Velocity by Dr_Singularity
in fact it is called: "The Singularity Is Nearer" (You can google it)
Loud-Ideal t1_jednu0r wrote
China cuts corners on safety, AI will be the same.
seas2699 t1_jednspr wrote
Reply to comment by Professional_Copy587 in Goddamn it's really happening by BreadManToast
no offense but sam altman is a better salesman than anything. you’re gonna take the word of the guy who said they need to increase regulations on companies other than his? my ass
Eleganos t1_jednp51 wrote
Reply to comment by tiselo3655necktaicom in Interesting article: AI will eventually free people up to 'work when they want to,' ChatGPT investor predicts by Coolsummerbreeze1
Difference is this time the new means of production will also have an opinion hat to throw into the ring.
Professional_Copy587 t1_jednor7 wrote
Reply to comment by BeGood9000 in Goddamn it's really happening by BreadManToast
You dont need to hope. Just go read the views of the majority of experts on the subject (and not just one)
Professional_Copy587 t1_jednlsc wrote
Reply to comment by futebollounge in Goddamn it's really happening by BreadManToast
I'm not. I actually do think (completely guessing) that humans create an AGI before 2032, but the hysteria and hype (and in the process the complete failure to understand how these systems work to produce the content they do) on this subreddit is reaching levels of complete delusion due to the echo chamber
theotherquantumjim t1_jednh7n wrote
Reply to comment by Andriyo in The argument that a computer can't really "understand" things is stupid and completely irrelevant. by hey__bert
Whilst this is correct, 1+1=2 will still be true whether there is someone to observe it or not.
BeGood9000 t1_jedndf2 wrote
Reply to comment by Professional_Copy587 in Goddamn it's really happening by BreadManToast
I really hope you are right
futebollounge t1_jedndb3 wrote
Reply to comment by Professional_Copy587 in Goddamn it's really happening by BreadManToast
Not that I’m in the AGI in 2025 camp or anything, but don’t be naive to Sam’s incentives here.
ninjasaid13 t1_jedn83g wrote
Reply to comment by Circ-Le-Jerk in LAION launches a petition to democratize AI research by establishing an international, publicly funded supercomputing facility equipped with 100,000 state-of-the-art AI accelerators to train open source foundation models. by BananaBus43
Well this isn't private sector right? CERN is nothing like OpenAI.
delphisucks t1_jedptst wrote
Reply to comment by tiselo3655necktaicom in Interesting article: AI will eventually free people up to 'work when they want to,' ChatGPT investor predicts by Coolsummerbreeze1
The reason government take no action because unemployment was never more than 50%. More like 5%. I think this is obvious, not?? Oh you think governments can ignore 50% unemployment??