Recent comments in /f/singularity
BlackMartini91 t1_jee9ydg wrote
AI is already superhuman at many things people aren't. There won't be an AGI only ASI
1II1I11II1I1I111I1 t1_jee9x9f wrote
Reply to comment by Professional_Copy587 in Goddamn it's really happening by BreadManToast
Watch this interview with Ilya Sutskever if you get the chance. The chief engineer (the brains) of OpenAI. If you read between the lines, or even take what he says at face value, it seems to him like there are very few hurdles between the paradigm of scaling LLMs and achieving AGI. We're very clearly on track, and very clearly the pace is only increasing. Unless regulation slows down AGI, it's most likely here before 2030.
genshiryoku t1_jee9v9j wrote
Tiktok should be banned, but not because it's "worse" than any other social media.
It should be banned because it's a direct tool for the Chinese Communist Party with proven direct links to the Chinese government as ByteDance has communist party members in their board of directors.
HydrousIt t1_jee9u3e wrote
Reply to Can you please stop answering technical/meta questions with „ask chatgpt“ or [chatgpt answer]? This is exhausting as f, and makes me worried about a dystopian future where people never use their own mind anymore but ask an AI basically everything, as if using a calculator for 5*4 or so. by BeginningInfluence55
>never use their mind anymore
If you don't know something, is it not a sensible decision to make (with your own mind) to ask an AI?
MrEloi t1_jee9tt8 wrote
Reply to comment by DragonForg in Vernor Vinge's Paper of the Technological Singularity by understanding0
The 32k version of GPT-4 - if ever made public - would/could allow outsiders to build an AGI or lookalike framework around GPT-4.
TFenrir t1_jee9pmm wrote
Reply to What if it's just chat bot infatuation and were overhyping what is just a super big chat bot? by Arowx
What does it even mean to overhype this?
Let me ask this way - do you think that eventually this technology will be able to write coherent novels?
What impact to the entire world would something like that have?
Do you think it will only be able to write novels?
MrEloi t1_jee9jvk wrote
Reply to What if it's just chat bot infatuation and were overhyping what is just a super big chat bot? by Arowx
just super large Neural Network based
​
JUST? JUST?
You just don't get it.
webernicke t1_jee97rk wrote
Reply to Goddamn it's really happening by BreadManToast
"We are the middle children of history. Born too late to explore the world, born too early to explore the universe."
That quote doesn't feel so bad these days.
mutantbeings t1_jee97nx wrote
Reply to comment by boreddaniel02 in When will AI actually start taking jobs? by Weeb_Geek_7779
No, tech support teams are dealing with floods of chatGPT spam that’s telling people inaccurate things about their products. At scale this is a MASSIVE inefficiency introduced by unreliable LLMs and without a shadow of a doubt is creating jobs right now
Automatic_Paint9319 t1_jee8xla wrote
Reply to comment by FlatulistMaster in Goddamn it's really happening by BreadManToast
Really? Old people tend to talk about how the old days were better, in my experience.
Away_Cat_7178 t1_jee8vvr wrote
Realistically, at this pace? Next week
boreddaniel02 t1_jee8vh5 wrote
Reply to comment by mutantbeings in When will AI actually start taking jobs? by Weeb_Geek_7779
Yes, it doesn't make sense. You're telling me that ChatGPT is being used to substitute tech support teams but there are still people required for tech support?
ConstantQuestion101 t1_jee8hhd wrote
Reply to comment by FrogFister in How does China think about AI safety? by Aggravating_Lake_657
dude Lol i think I'm replying to you again because i had the same stupid fear.
that doesn't happen, period.
police there are actually friendly as fuck and i even got to smoke a few cigarettes with a couple of them while sheltering from a storm in a fruit shop lol
if you can speak a little chinese or make friends with locals (my case) you will be able to solve a lot of your misconceptions about the country.
ConstantQuestion101 t1_jee85s1 wrote
Reply to comment by FrogFister in How does China think about AI safety? by Aggravating_Lake_657
it was mind blowing visiting a few cities in China. My first time in big cities where i didn't see a single homeless and didn't have to deal with that guilt.
was also cheap and extremely well received by everyone.
after my first time, I've been there three more and honestly loving asia more and more.
a lot you hear about china in western media is laughed about by them because it's straight up nonsense antichinese propaganda.
just go man, I bet you will absolutely love it.
im going at least once this year again to visit a different city, hopefully will be able to make two trips but that's another story.
nobodyisonething t1_jee7ucf wrote
It has already impacted the gig economy jobs. Generating awesome graphics using Midjourney is cheap and using DAL-E via bing is free. How many artists on fiver are losing traffic because of that? More than zero.
And my understanding is that some text writing fiver-level jobs are already gone too. Generating good text with ChatGPT is free and already available.
We are just at the start.
ilikeover9000turtles OP t1_jee7tuv wrote
Reply to comment by genericrich in ASI Is The Ultimate Weapon, And We Are In An Arms Race by ilikeover9000turtles
There really is no plan.
jlowe212 t1_jee7ruk wrote
Reply to What if it's just chat bot infatuation and were overhyping what is just a super big chat bot? by Arowx
If by overhype you mean looking for sentience or a tool to solve all the world's problems, then yes its just hype and will be for a long time, if not forever.
If you're looking for a tool that takes productivity and information gathering to a whole new level, it's not hype at all. It'll be the biggest leap forward since cheap PCs and the internet.
wadingthroughnothing t1_jee7n28 wrote
This headline is trash, tiktok sucks but "digital fentanyl" is the most fearmongery bullshit I have ever read.
genericrich t1_jee7j2r wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in ASI Is The Ultimate Weapon, And We Are In An Arms Race by ilikeover9000turtles
Killing humanity right away would kill them. Any ASI is going to need people to keep it turned on for quite a few years. We don't have robots that are able to swap servers, manage infrastructure, operate power plants, etc.
Yet.
The danger will be that the ASI starts helping us with robotics. Once it has its robot army factory, it could self-sustain.
Of course, it could make a mistake and kill us all inadvertently before then. But it would die too so if it is superintelligent it hopefully won't.
Shadez_Actual t1_jee7b4g wrote
Reply to comment by milsatr in How does China think about AI safety? by Aggravating_Lake_657
Capitalism has nothing to do with bureaucracy facing the US government… damn redditors are dumb af sometimes
jason_bman t1_jee7aty wrote
Reply to comment by tkeRe1337 in Goddamn it's really happening by BreadManToast
Damn I thought limewire was for downloading music. I missed out.
genericrich t1_jee793c wrote
Reply to comment by ilikeover9000turtles in ASI Is The Ultimate Weapon, And We Are In An Arms Race by ilikeover9000turtles
Hope is not a plan.
FlatulistMaster t1_jee78ml wrote
Reply to comment by visarga in Goddamn it's really happening by BreadManToast
This is true for that type of experiment, but some things can be developed in hours if only information processing is involved.
Also, the prediction power of an ASI would be something completely different than what humans are capable of, so it is fair to assume that unnecessary experiments will not be as plentiful.
NonDescriptfAIth t1_jee75o3 wrote
Reply to The only race that matters by Sure_Cicada_4459
AGI research is a race. If we run. We die.
Unlike the arms race that lead us to nuclear weapons, the development of AGI can occur largely in secret, both at a corporate and government level.
Even if there is a "successful" call to throw the brakes on current corporate AGI software development. The global infrastructure that drives all the other developments in the digital space will continue to roll onwards.
Chips get smaller. Data gets accrued and cleansed. Software becomes more intricate. The science of cognition more well understood.
There is no need for a Manhattan project. For this arms race we don't need behemoth underground facilities enriching uranium, instead we have a decentralised army of humans purifying data as they complete captchas to access their email.
This isn't even without ruminating on what unknown developments are taking place within the military backed regions of AGI development.
Telling the government to slow down is a non starter, it only opens up the opportunity to be outpaced by a rival state.
Corporations are racing each other.
Governments are racing each other.
Consumers are driving it forward by demanding ever better products and services.
Money, time and effort is being thrown at this singular goal like nothing ever before.
If aliens were to stand back and objectively sum up the activities of the human race. This would be it. This is what takes precedent above all else.
We don't care about climate change. We don't care about poverty. We don't care about leisure.
We want to make that chip smaller and faster and smarter than us. That is the sum goal of the human endeavour.
We are already locked in a race. A race in which crossing the finish line 'incorrectly' might mean that all participants lose.
I am often exasperated at the language that surrounds the possibility of AGI development going wrong.
Many act as if this race ending in global disruption is unlikely. There are some that think this won't even effect employment opportunities that significantly.
Allow me to be incredibly clear. If we continue on the path we are on. We will die.
China will either pre-emptively strike the US with nuclear weapons out of fear they are nearly complete with their development of AGI.
Likewise the US would not tolerate the prospect of an artificial super intelligence that operates under the instruction of the Chinese communist party.
Think that's unrealistic?
Fine, lets assume that America has the advantage and sneakily unleashes it's AGI on the globe without sparking a thermonuclear Armageddon.
Well what exactly will they ask the AGI to do? We are racing towards the construction of a tool for which we have no clear and defined use of.
Do you think the US military industrial complex will be satisfied with unleashing a trillion dollar digital mind on the world without specifying that it prioritize the lives of it's own citizens above the lives of others?
Don't think that's a big deal?
That there is an all knowing, all powerful entity that prioritizes the lives of some over the lives of others?
The only distinction between God and Satan is that God is all loving and Satan is not.
We must tread carefully on what we unleash on ourselves.
Must I continue to explain how corporations won't likely have the greater good in mind if they cross the finish line first either?
The most powerful algorithms in existence today are the likes of YouTube, TikTok and Meta. All of which generate profit by leveraging our internal dopamine pathways against us. The only goal of the most powerful AI systems that we interact with us is to steal away our lives with consecutive shitty videos.
There is no stopping this race. We are collectively gunning for a hard take off as fast as possible.
Our only chance of survival is make sure that the super intelligent God that we create is a kind one. Not a sociopathic machine specifically tasked to kill and exploit human beings.
The only way we can achieve this is by having a global dialogue about what we want this AGI to do for humanity.
Without a global alignment on the goals and formulation of this entity, we are certain to bake into it our own flaws, our human paranoia and aggression and indifference.
Yet this is exactly where we are heading at break neck pace.
If you want to help change this reality, drop me a message and we can start planning.
KaptainKraken t1_jee9yyw wrote
Reply to comment by NonDescriptfAIth in The only race that matters by Sure_Cicada_4459
Gpt summarized of above
"The development of AGI is a race between governments and corporations, driven by consumer demand for better products and services. Unlike the arms race, AGI development can occur largely in secret, and attempts to slow it down would be futile and could lead to being outpaced by rivals. The race poses significant risks, and if we continue on our current path, it could result in global disruption and potentially even nuclear war between nations."