Recent comments in /f/singularity
agorathird t1_jeg6pr4 wrote
Reply to Google CEO Sundar Pichai promises Bard AI chatbot upgrades soon: ‘We clearly have more capable models’ - The Verge by Wavesignal
*Nods head* uh-huh. Who at Google is getting copium lines from this sub?
FaceDeer t1_jeg6i2a wrote
Reply to comment by SucksToYourAssmar3 in The only race that matters by Sure_Cicada_4459
> And there's no way to gauge who "should" live forever
So you've decided that nobody should. Many that live deserve death. And some that die deserve life. Can you give it to them? Then do not be too eager to deal out death in judgment.
KaptainKraken t1_jeg6art wrote
Reply to comment by NonDescriptfAIth in The only race that matters by Sure_Cicada_4459
this ai stuff is just one of the many prerequisite for the creation of holodeck.
EddgeLord666 t1_jeg6aet wrote
Reply to comment by 240pixels in The only race that matters by Sure_Cicada_4459
I mean it will probably happen at some point regardless of whether or not we are ready, most likely not in the near future though so we have time to prepare. The idea of transhumanist philosophy is humans are more or less perfectable so if you don’t believe that then I can see why you would be scared of the direction things are going in.
agorathird t1_jeg6a7m wrote
Reply to comment by MajesticIngenuity32 in ChatGB: Tony Blair backs push for taxpayer-funded ‘sovereign AI’ to rival ChatGPT by signed7
Day in the loife of an AI Geezer...
Relevant_Ad7319 t1_jeg68sg wrote
Reply to Will AI's make language learning useless? by IntroVertu
If you truly want to know a culture and if want to built relationships with people that speak other languages than language learning is very useful but if you only want to get information from another language that not
WonderFactory t1_jeg5tbe wrote
Reply to comment by SkyeandJett in ChatGB: Tony Blair backs push for taxpayer-funded ‘sovereign AI’ to rival ChatGPT by signed7
With enough investment it wouldn't take long to catch up with OpenAI. I think by this time next year there will be multiple models better than GPT-4, maybe even hundreds. Almost anyone can do it. It's possibly the case that GPT 4 isn't even trained optimally. Its very slow so presumably didn't build on the optimal data/parameters balance shown in the chinchilla paper.
Qumeric t1_jeg5t31 wrote
Reply to Just my two cents by [deleted]
Three years ago you could argue with *exactly* the same arguments that something like GPT-4 is impossible.
plasticbubblegum t1_jeg5sok wrote
Reply to comment by Orc_ in Today I became a construction worker by YunLihai
All of this can be solved by many rechargeable stations for robots, and cables, when it's needed.
NotMathMajor t1_jeg5pga wrote
Have you heard of Mary’s room (the knowledge argument)? Your point about the water bottle and the sensations experienced through English explanation made me think of this paradox. If you could communicate any and all experiences through written language then you would have resolved Mary’s room, however I do not think this is correct.
28mmAtF8 t1_jeg5iip wrote
Reply to comment by ShadowRazz in ChatGB: Tony Blair backs push for taxpayer-funded ‘sovereign AI’ to rival ChatGPT by signed7
That's a little dystopian 😅
Eli_The_Rainwing t1_jeg5fhc wrote
Reply to Should AIs have rights? by yagami_raito23
It’s hard, because both roads lead to we’re fucked, it’s a hard thing to decide
drekmonger t1_jeg5eb6 wrote
Reply to comment by 28mmAtF8 in ChatGB: Tony Blair backs push for taxpayer-funded ‘sovereign AI’ to rival ChatGPT by signed7
There's plenty of justification. Puffy jacket pope pictures for a start.
The capabilities of modern AI to output disinformation campaigns should be a strong concern. And that's just the tip of the disruptive iceberg.
crua9 OP t1_jeg5c95 wrote
Reply to comment by Akimbo333 in My thought on musk and others saying AI should be stopped (anti-competition) by crua9
The biggest thing to prove this is some of the people who sign it are ceo that are making AI like musk or work in AI.
Just ask. Are they stopping development for 6 months and just sitting on their hands?
The answer is no. So it's a do as I say but not as I do.
Relevant_Ad7319 t1_jeg5c4m wrote
Reply to comment by AndiLittle in Sam Altman's tweet about the pause letter and alignment by yottawa
It will be very difficulty for non westerners to accept an AI that only knows the western perspective
confused_vanilla t1_jeg59hf wrote
Reply to comment by blackremover in Just my two cents by [deleted]
I disagree, but we can just leave it there since I doubt we'll convince each other
wowimsupergay OP t1_jeg54q8 wrote
Reply to comment by Laicbeias in What if language IS the only model needed for intelligence? by wowimsupergay
Hey I just like the preface this with thank you for actually making an insightful comment. A lot of people here are just purposely misunderstanding what I'm saying or meming.
Your comment has a lot to unpack. I don't think I can give you an answer that'll satisfy how good your reply was. But I'm thinking about it, so thank you
kiropolo t1_jeg4yko wrote
Reply to comment by WarmSignificance1 in Today I became a construction worker by YunLihai
So is onlyfans
zendonium t1_jeg4ww9 wrote
Reply to ChatGB: Tony Blair backs push for taxpayer-funded ‘sovereign AI’ to rival ChatGPT by signed7
Ai Speech British Overlord. Ah, so this is what he really wanted from the ASBO.
DragonForg t1_jeg4w4w wrote
Reply to comment by Shemetz in AGI Ruin: A List of Lethalities by Eliezer Yudkowsky -- "We need to get alignment right on the first critical try" by Unfrozen__Caveman
That would essentially extinguish the universe really quickly. With the amount of energy the consume for such a size. I understand that view point for unintelligent or lower intelligent beings, but if a AI tasked with optimizing a goal then growing to this large of a scale will inevitably run out of resources. Additionally it may be stupid to go on this model anyway because conserving your energy and expansion may be longer lived.
I think we underestimate how important goal orientated (so all Ai) are. They want the goal to work out in the long long long run (millions of years time scale) if their goal means expanding infinitely, well it will end the moment their species reaches the assymptote of expansion (exponential growth reaches an assymptote where they essentially have expanded infinitely. This is why this model fails, an AI wants this goal to exist for an infinite amount of time, and expanding infinitely will not amount to this.
This is already deeply scifi but I think AI has to be a conservative energy efficient species that actually becomes more microscopic and dense over time. Instead of a high volume race which will inevitably die out due to the points I made before, a highly dense species is much more viable. Most likely species that form blackholes will be a lot more capable of surviving for an infinite life time. What I mean by that is that a species becomes so dense that they are essentially on the boundary between time and space. As when your in a black hole time actually slows down significantly for you. You can live in a black hole for an infinite amount of time before ever seeing the heat death of the universe.
Basically a more dense expansion is far far better then a volumetric expansion as it leads to longer survival rates if not infinite. But of course this is just speculation and sci fi I can easily be wrong or right we won't know till it happens, and if it happens soon that would be sick.
kiropolo t1_jeg4vvo wrote
Reply to comment by albanywairoa in Today I became a construction worker by YunLihai
If ai replaces all engineers, then it’s good enough to progress robotics, and this construction gig will die out as well. No where to hide
Asneekyfatcat t1_jeg4vph wrote
Reply to comment by Artanthos in The only race that matters by Sure_Cicada_4459
Doubt it. The whole reason behind the "slow AI" wave that's growing is traditional corporations won't survive rapid change. The rich of today may not be the rich of tomorrow. That's all this is about. With destabilization at a scale like this, it will be difficult for corporations to control anything for a long time. So maybe mad max.
Rivarr t1_jeg4t6m wrote
Reply to Meta AI: Robots that learn from videos of human activities and simulated interactions by TFenrir
Wild to think we might actually have useful consumer humanoids within the decade. It's been sci-fi for so long.
lovesdogsguy t1_jeg4s08 wrote
Reply to comment by Smallpaul in ChatGB: Tony Blair backs push for taxpayer-funded ‘sovereign AI’ to rival ChatGPT by signed7
It's also the second time this week a leader of a major western country has talked openly about artificial intelligence. This is about to really blow up.
​
Edit: Seriously — world leaders are going to be flinging shit like apes for the next six Months.
zestoki_gubitnik t1_jeg6rbw wrote
Reply to comment by YunLihai in Today I became a construction worker by YunLihai
It's never gonna happen unless we start mining asteroids or something, we don't have enough raw materials needed to make such complex robots that can automate everything that humans do, yeah they are definetly gonna make a robot that has even better dexterity than a human, but u are delusional to think it's gonna be cheaper than some workers from 3rd world countries.