I see you shiver with antici

Education isn't the limiting factor, it's the massive retooling and change in standards that would be needed across many industries. Not to mention also the need to then ensure interchangeable parts between measurement standards (think housing materials, for example), which could mean increased inventory which is a financial burden for companies.

Unfortunately, the impact is astronomically huge and the imperial measurement system is too ingrained for it to change and make financial sense.

PBS's NOVA did an episode about it.

If you want something in-depth NASA's Columbia Crew Survival Investigation Report pdf gets deep into the sequence of events. Redacted in some crew-related sections btw.

Woah... I never put that together... October Sky is just Rocket Boys scrambled...

Neat...

That would require having a functional education system

[removed]

Here is another good video showing what you'd see but simplified for a non-rotating black hole.

https://youtu.be/4rTv9wvvat8

What do you mean by the event horizon in the case of protons, electrons and neutrons?

You'd actually use a penrose diagram and plot it out on there.

[removed]

Hey man, time dilation can be scary!

You can get the actual mission stuff from youtube from lunarmouse i think? Just google the flight... "NASA STS-###"

My first guess would be that they will be able to see each other because light doesn't need to follow a radial geodesic.

The only way to make sure is to write Schwarzschild metric, find the path of the two falling observers (you can assume radial geodesic) and then find all the possible null geodesics that cross a point of the trajectory of observer 1 and see if any of them also crosses the trajectory of the other observer.

Remember that it wont be just milky way then, but milky way - andromeda galaxy.

It's just the China vs the world part that felt off, the telescope is nice, but it's not a world beater

8 meters.... I mean 😂

So is there a real alternative to Penrose explanation? I guess the current scientific empirical truth is just that everything started from the big bang and nothing was before that, because before that nothing cannot be confirmed empirically or mathematically. So they just leave it be.

Still want to see a 100 meter tele, the nuclear option of telescope

The hypothesis that a black hole was the big bang is not really supported. And of course it is insufficiant in itself, because the black hole had to come from somewhere.

[deleted]

There is no outside the universe. Just stop. The universe is everything that exists.

Here it is

You can 100% cross it. You only appear to stop to outside observers. You don't actually stop.

You can't see them, no paths for light lead to them. All paths lead to the center. Light can not go from them to you or vise versa. The only light you can see is from where you came from.

You'd see something like this.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HuCJ8s_xMnI

Note, all real black holes spin and drag space with them in a tremendous vortex of warped space time like you see in this video.

Also all the light you see is from the accretion disk being bent around the black hole into your eyes from all sides of the black hole. The light you see may look strange but it is accurate and from the accretion disk. You see it everywhere because of how the space is warped near the black hole. Light from all sides of the black hole can reach you because of the warped space.

I'm sorry science doesn't love supporting your feelings over actually being right

[removed]