Recent comments in /f/space

zugi t1_j299wea wrote

Counter counterpoint: Bezos has money and got only silly toys at the edge of space. Branson has money and got nowhere too. NASA has money - billions in tax dollars - yet they can't build anything without spreading the work across 50 states and 100 different contractors. Until they changed their contracting method to contract types that Space X could bid on and win, which was smart on their part.

Sure, having a bunch of money is important - getting into the space business requires a lot of startup capital. But even with money, most ventures fail, yet Musk succeeded. I just think it's strange the lengths that 2022 redditors are willing to go to deny Musk any credit at all for Tesla, Space X, Starlink, etc. But regardless of credit, Space X is revolutionizing access to space, and that's a great thing.

2

PM_ME_A_PLANE_TICKET t1_j298i8c wrote

I'm not sure if you're aware, but the current education budget is like 75 billion and the current military budget is like 750 billion.

You just wanna equalize those? just... 2023 education budget 400 billion, 2023 military budget 400 billion?

you think that's a good idea?

1

Muninwing t1_j2975yb wrote

Counterpoint: musk has always been like this… but that’s not why he has been successful.

Money. That’s it. He has money. So he launched a pet project… and hired committed, intelligent people to work there. But listen to accounts of his “management style” — at SpaceX, they had to devote resources to managing him and distracting him from undermining their work.

Billionaires are more predatory, more selfish, and better funded than other people. Not smarter, more skilled, or somehow better people.

4

smurfherder1 t1_j2971ad wrote

Great people are very infrequently good people. If you look at any major business leader from the past century that revolutionised their area such as Henry Ford for cars, the Robber barons for oil etc, or Howard Hughes in later life for aircraft they all changed the world we lived for the better but you probably wouldn't invite them round for dinner or agree with most of their views but stuff seemed to turn out all right.

1

cbusalex t1_j295xdr wrote

> You might get a glimpse of them just before you both pass the event horizon

At the very least, you'd see them (well, a very distorted image of them) at 90 degrees left and right as you cross the photon sphere.

1

imzelda t1_j295d3y wrote

I’m deeply concerned about billionaires running anything at all that affects us, the earth, or the future.

They don’t even want peace for themselves. I don’t understand why they don’t go live their luxurious lives on an island somewhere and be happy. If they donated the majority of their wealth to help people or the planet, they would be heroes in history and STILL couldn’t spend all the money they have left in their lifetime or their children’s. What do they want?

It’s honestly so creepy.

3

Noehk t1_j2955gd wrote

As opposed to the people leading us politically, socially, economically, morally, philosophically?

I'm not American and my comment is not whataboutism, rather I think your post is indicative of a certain political and social spectrum that lacks a balanced perspective; you clearly have a viewpoint that is very much at odds with Elon and as such you feel threatened by what you characterize as a "a Facebook right-wing shitposter is now at the head of one of the most significant private space corporations of this generation?" yet you seem to forget that that private space corporation is owned by HIM as a private institution, it's not as if someone elected him to be in charge of, say, NASA or ESA and is therefore a public servant you can set expectation on job delivery.

You dislike him, his viewpoints and goals? Fine, make your own private space corporation or support another company who shares your point of view. Easy.

2