Recent comments in /f/space
Doc891 t1_j4f6d1i wrote
i am absolutely ignorant when it comes to this stuff, but i do remember Ian Malcolm from Jurrassic Park, and I worry what the long reaching dangers of messing with the trajectory of giant rocks in the sky might be. Im assuming they are studying this, but how accurate can they be with regard to where these asteroids would go and what other things might be in their path along the way before hitting it?
[deleted] t1_j4f4ell wrote
[removed]
tcadmn t1_j4f2h8h wrote
Reply to The multiverse by Manureofhistory
To me, there are 3 possibilities. The multiverse doesn’t exist, the multiverse is not infinite, or the multiverse exists, but it is not possible (at least yet) to travel between multiverses. If the multiverse is infinite and traversable, there would be infinite travelers showing up in infinite locations, in every multiverse.
gwardotnet t1_j4f2gbn wrote
Reply to The multiverse by Manureofhistory
We'll never know any of it. Never. We'll find more mysteries.
Rich_Cartoonist8399 t1_j4f1z7l wrote
Reply to comment by czechmixing in The multiverse by Manureofhistory
It’s sort of mind breaking, your meat brain wasn’t built to imagine such things. But in order to have an event, you need a place and time. Xyz and time coordinates. You have a place without a time, that’s not an event. Time without a place, not an event. Without both of them nothing happens.
I’ve always thought that “supernatural” phenomena were people encountering something beyond their ability to parse, so they can only understand it via a preexisting cultural framework - aliens, angels, etc
Edit: it gets more confusing when you start thinking about how time space is essentially created by the forces of gravity
Psychological_Age194 t1_j4f05u3 wrote
Reply to Xenophobia of black holes? by ZAlexN
I don’t think you quite understand what xenophobia means
DNASweat_SMH t1_j4ez6c0 wrote
Reply to The multiverse by Manureofhistory
I look at multiverse like an explosion. When there is an explosion the forces are directed 360 degrees.
When we look at the Big Bang we are seeing the light from a single point. Imagine seeing a light from a afar enough to see its single but not close enough to whats directly behind the light.
I think our universe is 1 of a few or 1 of 360. I think it’s somewhere in between.
Top_Pineapple_2041 t1_j4eyjug wrote
Reply to Xenophobia of black holes? by ZAlexN
Not at all. Manny People experience similar feeling for other reason. It has a name but can remember it right know. I get the same feeling looking up in a cloud free day seeing nothing but empty sky.
SiliconeArmadildo t1_j4ey8u9 wrote
Reply to The multiverse by Manureofhistory
The multiverse is one of many similar theories who's sole purpose is to hypothesize about unknown. For everything we know about physics, there are still a lot of things that don't add up, and things like multiverse theries just propose possibilities that might fill in the blanks.
Fishyonekenobi t1_j4ey7gn wrote
Reply to The multiverse by Manureofhistory
Not only are there multiverses but there’s an infinite number of them for all time. “Nothing” cannot exist. It’s like dividing by zero. Universes are a wave of matter and energy.
dashingstag t1_j4ewywg wrote
Reply to The multiverse by Manureofhistory
I think it’s our inability to fathom the infinite. The way I think about it is to imagine our universe as an atom and the other universes are atoms beside it.
TheGreatestOutdoorz t1_j4evvi2 wrote
Reply to Xenophobia of black holes? by ZAlexN
Are trolls targeting this sub? Seems every post now is someone trolling/asking bizarre questions.
iwoodificood t1_j4evsc3 wrote
Reply to comment by b_a_t_m_4_n in Xenophobia of black holes? by ZAlexN
He didn’t say anything bad about white holes though.
NapoleonsDynamite t1_j4ev78z wrote
Reply to comment by MattyLaa2022 in Where can I find the most DETAILED accounts of the moon landings? by ostensibly_hurt
Came here to say this.
Homemade documentaries is one of my favorite documentary series of all time and I watch a lot of documentaries. It is utterly terrific and insightful.
[deleted] t1_j4ev70w wrote
Reply to Moon tilt illusion? by ThatFlashCat
[removed]
[deleted] t1_j4es147 wrote
Reply to The multiverse by Manureofhistory
I’ve always subscribed to the possibility that what is considered impossible in our universe may not be so in another; who says they all have to abide by the same scientific laws as our universe?
PDXalreadtused t1_j4eqqtj wrote
Reply to The multiverse by Manureofhistory
The closest I have gotten to the multiverse is dmt, will definitely open ones eyes.
[deleted] t1_j4eq96w wrote
Reply to comment by ammonium_bot in The multiverse by Manureofhistory
[removed]
sailorlazarus t1_j4eph2l wrote
Reply to comment by Quwinsoft in What if a probe is sent to C/2022 E3 to drop a cache of human civilization on it? by cyberanakinvader
Exploitation by more advanced civilizations here on earth comes from a need/desire for more resources. Be that gold, spices, slaves, whatever.
If a civilization is sufficiently advanced to have interstellar travel, we have nothing they would want. Human slaves are less efficient than machines. Any type of material that earth has can be gained elsewhere easier. I doubt they would care about our spices. I suppose they could just be cruel, but crossing the galaxy to kill off humans would be like a human flying to the other side planet to swat a fly.
EDIT: More like building a custom solid gold jumbo jet that can only use diamonds as fuel to fly several times around the globe exclusively to swat a fly that you read about in a cuneiform tablet written in Mesopotamia.
[deleted] t1_j4epgls wrote
Reply to The multiverse by Manureofhistory
Multiverse could be just two. Or 11. Doesn't have to be infinite.
I picture the the universe as a bubble. A multiverse could be seen as another bubble stuck to more bubbles. Like foam. Or bubble bath.
LiberalAspergers t1_j4ep3zz wrote
Reply to The multiverse by Manureofhistory
You are combining two distinct interpretations of quantum mechanics. In a multiverse interpretation, there is no waveform collapse, as all possible outcomes occur.
[deleted] t1_j4eneee wrote
Reply to comment by Hopsblues in What if a probe is sent to C/2022 E3 to drop a cache of human civilization on it? by cyberanakinvader
[removed]
Beginning-Floor9284 t1_j4en1qz wrote
Reply to The multiverse by Manureofhistory
Here is my take using logical deduction principles. ? Particles > Atom > molecule > cell > organism > planet > solar system > galaxy > universe > ?
Stop on both sides or multiverse
ChrisGear101 t1_j4emshp wrote
Reply to The multiverse by Manureofhistory
It's easy. It's a bullshit term invented to allow movie executives to make horrible movies that follow no timeline, lore or canon.
pm_me_wet_kittehs t1_j4f6lii wrote
Reply to comment by Doc891 in NASA’s Double Asteroid Redirection Test Is a Smashing Success - Eos by donutloop
space is big. really big. you just wouldn't believe how hugely, mind bogglingly big it is.