Recent comments in /f/space

Doc891 t1_j4f6d1i wrote

i am absolutely ignorant when it comes to this stuff, but i do remember Ian Malcolm from Jurrassic Park, and I worry what the long reaching dangers of messing with the trajectory of giant rocks in the sky might be. Im assuming they are studying this, but how accurate can they be with regard to where these asteroids would go and what other things might be in their path along the way before hitting it?

−3

tcadmn t1_j4f2h8h wrote

To me, there are 3 possibilities. The multiverse doesn’t exist, the multiverse is not infinite, or the multiverse exists, but it is not possible (at least yet) to travel between multiverses. If the multiverse is infinite and traversable, there would be infinite travelers showing up in infinite locations, in every multiverse.

2

Rich_Cartoonist8399 t1_j4f1z7l wrote

Reply to comment by czechmixing in The multiverse by Manureofhistory

It’s sort of mind breaking, your meat brain wasn’t built to imagine such things. But in order to have an event, you need a place and time. Xyz and time coordinates. You have a place without a time, that’s not an event. Time without a place, not an event. Without both of them nothing happens.

I’ve always thought that “supernatural” phenomena were people encountering something beyond their ability to parse, so they can only understand it via a preexisting cultural framework - aliens, angels, etc

Edit: it gets more confusing when you start thinking about how time space is essentially created by the forces of gravity

11

DNASweat_SMH t1_j4ez6c0 wrote

I look at multiverse like an explosion. When there is an explosion the forces are directed 360 degrees.

When we look at the Big Bang we are seeing the light from a single point. Imagine seeing a light from a afar enough to see its single but not close enough to whats directly behind the light.

I think our universe is 1 of a few or 1 of 360. I think it’s somewhere in between.

2

Top_Pineapple_2041 t1_j4eyjug wrote

Not at all. Manny People experience similar feeling for other reason. It has a name but can remember it right know. I get the same feeling looking up in a cloud free day seeing nothing but empty sky.

1

SiliconeArmadildo t1_j4ey8u9 wrote

The multiverse is one of many similar theories who's sole purpose is to hypothesize about unknown. For everything we know about physics, there are still a lot of things that don't add up, and things like multiverse theries just propose possibilities that might fill in the blanks.

1

Fishyonekenobi t1_j4ey7gn wrote

Not only are there multiverses but there’s an infinite number of them for all time. “Nothing” cannot exist. It’s like dividing by zero. Universes are a wave of matter and energy.

1

dashingstag t1_j4ewywg wrote

I think it’s our inability to fathom the infinite. The way I think about it is to imagine our universe as an atom and the other universes are atoms beside it.

1

[deleted] t1_j4es147 wrote

I’ve always subscribed to the possibility that what is considered impossible in our universe may not be so in another; who says they all have to abide by the same scientific laws as our universe?

1

sailorlazarus t1_j4eph2l wrote

Exploitation by more advanced civilizations here on earth comes from a need/desire for more resources. Be that gold, spices, slaves, whatever.

If a civilization is sufficiently advanced to have interstellar travel, we have nothing they would want. Human slaves are less efficient than machines. Any type of material that earth has can be gained elsewhere easier. I doubt they would care about our spices. I suppose they could just be cruel, but crossing the galaxy to kill off humans would be like a human flying to the other side planet to swat a fly.

EDIT: More like building a custom solid gold jumbo jet that can only use diamonds as fuel to fly several times around the globe exclusively to swat a fly that you read about in a cuneiform tablet written in Mesopotamia.

2

[deleted] t1_j4epgls wrote

Multiverse could be just two. Or 11. Doesn't have to be infinite.

I picture the the universe as a bubble. A multiverse could be seen as another bubble stuck to more bubbles. Like foam. Or bubble bath.

2

LiberalAspergers t1_j4ep3zz wrote

You are combining two distinct interpretations of quantum mechanics. In a multiverse interpretation, there is no waveform collapse, as all possible outcomes occur.

2

Beginning-Floor9284 t1_j4en1qz wrote

Here is my take using logical deduction principles. ? Particles > Atom > molecule > cell > organism > planet > solar system > galaxy > universe > ?

Stop on both sides or multiverse

1

ChrisGear101 t1_j4emshp wrote

It's easy. It's a bullshit term invented to allow movie executives to make horrible movies that follow no timeline, lore or canon.

−1