Recent comments in /f/space
alphakiller35 t1_j52jj82 wrote
Reply to comment by p-d-ball in ClearSpace raises $29 million ahead of first debris removal mission by sillychillly
Alright, guess we’re starting a space pirate crew boys! 🏴☠️👽🏴☠️🛸🏴☠️
Whos up for plundering one of the silly little gray guys ships?
[deleted] t1_j52jgs8 wrote
Reply to comment by p-d-ball in ClearSpace raises $29 million ahead of first debris removal mission by sillychillly
[deleted]
84camaroguy t1_j52jdqv wrote
Reply to comment by budgie0507 in Ancient humans and their early depictions of the universe: “It is no exaggeration to say that astronomy has existed as an exact science for more than five millennia,” writes the late science historian John North. by clayt6
Even with glasses some peoples vision is terrible. My wife kept complaining she couldn’t see the things I would point out. I took her out to the beach in the middle of nowhere and pointed out Cassiopeia and drew the main stars in the sand and had her fill in the stars around it by descending brightness. That was the day I learned that even with corrected vision, some peoples eyes just aren’t that good.
ILTBR t1_j52jbdx wrote
Reply to Ancient humans and their early depictions of the universe: “It is no exaggeration to say that astronomy has existed as an exact science for more than five millennia,” writes the late science historian John North. by clayt6
That's true but people are stupid and think that's astrology not astronomy
niknok850 t1_j52j82h wrote
Reply to Ancient humans and their early depictions of the universe: “It is no exaggeration to say that astronomy has existed as an exact science for more than five millennia,” writes the late science historian John North. by clayt6
Describing the night sky or seasons is not astronomy. Yes, ancient peoples were often far more intelligent than we give them credit for. But it’s unnecessary to say they had all of astronomy figured out back then.
amitym t1_j52icn2 wrote
Reply to comment by Salty-Pack-4165 in Ancient humans and their early depictions of the universe: “It is no exaggeration to say that astronomy has existed as an exact science for more than five millennia,” writes the late science historian John North. by clayt6
Absolutely, no guess there. It was Brahe and Kepler's astronomical collaboration that led to Kepler's discovery of "the force that moves the worlds" and, thence, Newton's theories of gravitation, motion, continuous mathematical functions, the speed of light, and so on.
So it probably was for everyone who studied the stars carefully. Whenever someone ever said, "I feel like it must be the equinox" and then consulted their astronomical rock markings and learned that, actually, no, irrespective of how they might feel the equinox is not for another 3 weeks.... that was science right there.
mustafar0111 t1_j52i9cx wrote
Reply to comment by Elbynerual in Galactic photo shoot captures over 3 billion stars by Exastiken
I think the big deal with this one is they were able to resolve down to the individual stars.
If you take a pic of M31 you'll capture the core and discs around it but you won't be able to resolve down to individual stars unless you've got some pretty expensive optics.
[deleted] t1_j52hsz9 wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in ClearSpace raises $29 million ahead of first debris removal mission by sillychillly
[removed]
amitym t1_j52hf2h wrote
Reply to comment by Zeduca in Ancient humans and their early depictions of the universe: “It is no exaggeration to say that astronomy has existed as an exact science for more than five millennia,” writes the late science historian John North. by clayt6
I mean we see the "documents" all over, in stone.
Okay maybe not all over all over. But it's no kind of mysterious thing that we can only guess at.
lunex t1_j52h96u wrote
Reply to comment by RodgerRodgy in Ancient humans and their early depictions of the universe: “It is no exaggeration to say that astronomy has existed as an exact science for more than five millennia,” writes the late science historian John North. by clayt6
It just makes too much sense, right?
[deleted] t1_j52h755 wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_j52gtxj wrote
Reply to comment by Effective-Avocado470 in Are Two Tidally Locked Earth in One Solar System Possible? by Thirdy-DOg
[removed]
mustafar0111 t1_j52gt6j wrote
Reply to comment by Timetraveler01110101 in It’s a crime against humanity that we don’t have a live feed telescope in space. by Timetraveler01110101
You can look up anytime you want. No one is stopping you. You can even buy a telescope if you want.
Timetraveler01110101 OP t1_j52g7my wrote
Reply to comment by mustafar0111 in It’s a crime against humanity that we don’t have a live feed telescope in space. by Timetraveler01110101
I refuse to accept your line of thinking. Until we have FTL travel might as well enjoy looking up while we learn
Effective-Avocado470 t1_j52g6u8 wrote
Reply to comment by SweatyFLMan1130 in Are Two Tidally Locked Earth in One Solar System Possible? by Thirdy-DOg
It's a volume and density thing, when you're dealing with cubed radii it gets a bit non intuitive
RodgerRodgy t1_j52g06u wrote
Reply to comment by lunex in Ancient humans and their early depictions of the universe: “It is no exaggeration to say that astronomy has existed as an exact science for more than five millennia,” writes the late science historian John North. by clayt6
This is my new Graham Hancock headcanon.
rabbitwonker t1_j52fv3v wrote
Reply to comment by casc1701 in ClearSpace raises $29 million ahead of first debris removal mission by sillychillly
Fortunately Starship has the potential for as much as two.
mustafar0111 t1_j52frjm wrote
Reply to comment by Timetraveler01110101 in It’s a crime against humanity that we don’t have a live feed telescope in space. by Timetraveler01110101
Science. Astrophysicists can use the telescopes to learn how the universe actually works and refine theories. Telescopes are expensive and complicated to put in space and they can make better use of those then we can.
For just public interest telescopes on earth will do just fine if you setup the right equipment. Some of the newer automated one can do the entire process from image acquisition to stacking and auto post-processing live.
Mkwdr t1_j52fe5p wrote
Reply to comment by Dyerssorrow in Ancient humans and their early depictions of the universe: “It is no exaggeration to say that astronomy has existed as an exact science for more than five millennia,” writes the late science historian John North. by clayt6
‘Allegedly’
>The explanation favored by Sagan is that the Dogon were visited by a technological civilization, but not an extraterrestrial one. The nature of the knowledge imparted is consistent with a visit by a science attentive person in the 1930s or 1940s when the discovery of the nature of Sirius B was being widely discussed in popular science books. This information could then have been woven into the Dogon's existing mythology in time to give Griaule and Dieterlen something very interesting to write home about.
>A variation on this theme is that the knowledgeable visitor and the source of the information might have been Griaule himself. Though an anthropologist, Griaule had studied astronomy in Paris. He was aware of the discovery of Sirius B and may have over interpreted the Dogon responses to his questions.
>In 1991 Walter van Beek, a Belgian anthropologist, led a team of anthropologists to study the Dogon tribe. Although he hoped to find evidence for their astounding astronomical knowledge, the team found no trace of the detailed Sirius lore reported by Griaule.
https://chandra.harvard.edu/chronicle/0400/sirius_part2.html
Timetraveler01110101 OP t1_j52f8os wrote
Reply to comment by mustafar0111 in It’s a crime against humanity that we don’t have a live feed telescope in space. by Timetraveler01110101
What better use could there be other than to spark people’s interest in space and the realization we can pool our resources to get there
WutWhoSaidDat t1_j52etb4 wrote
Reply to comment by budgie0507 in Ancient humans and their early depictions of the universe: “It is no exaggeration to say that astronomy has existed as an exact science for more than five millennia,” writes the late science historian John North. by clayt6
It’s called Darwin. Those people would’ve been dead quickly.
Edit: you can’t see, you can’t hunt for food very well back then. You also can’t see threats. So you’d be dead. Natural selection you stupid fucks.
Sv3den t1_j52kdx4 wrote
Reply to comment by niknok850 in Ancient humans and their early depictions of the universe: “It is no exaggeration to say that astronomy has existed as an exact science for more than five millennia,” writes the late science historian John North. by clayt6
Being that we do not have "all of astronomy figured out" in the present day, it is therefor safe to say that no one is claiming ancient peoples did either.