Recent comments in /f/space
[deleted] t1_j55ou5z wrote
zeeblecroid t1_j55odcu wrote
Reply to comment by collegefurtrader in ClearSpace raises $29 million ahead of first debris removal mission by sillychillly
Basically that, yeah. Debris recovery that involves physical rendezvous is a flashy dead end, but still a dead end.
zeeblecroid t1_j55o8kc wrote
Reply to comment by PandaEven3982 in ClearSpace raises $29 million ahead of first debris removal mission by sillychillly
With what delta-V?
space-ModTeam t1_j55n8cg wrote
Reply to Can someone recommend a good night sky app and a good resource to be able to find C/2022 E3 (ZTF)? by DomesticApe23
Hello u/DomesticApe23, your submission "Can someone recommend a good night sky app and a good resource to be able to find C/2022 E3 (ZTF)?" has been removed from r/space because:
- Such questions should be asked in the "All space questions" thread stickied at the top of the sub.
Please read the rules in the sidebar and check r/space for duplicate submissions before posting. If you have any questions about this removal please message the r/space moderators. Thank you.
[deleted] t1_j55n70p wrote
xSwyftx t1_j55n220 wrote
Reply to Can someone recommend a good night sky app and a good resource to be able to find C/2022 E3 (ZTF)? by DomesticApe23
Stellarium is an outstanding app and easy to use
[deleted] t1_j55mn79 wrote
bookers555 t1_j55m561 wrote
Reply to Ancient humans and their early depictions of the universe: “It is no exaggeration to say that astronomy has existed as an exact science for more than five millennia,” writes the late science historian John North. by clayt6
Not like it produced much of value until a couple hundred years ago.
[deleted] t1_j55lq3m wrote
[deleted] t1_j55l4do wrote
tickle_fist t1_j55k2o1 wrote
Reply to Can someone recommend a good night sky app and a good resource to be able to find C/2022 E3 (ZTF)? by DomesticApe23
I know this website shows which satellites, and possibly comets, that you can see based on your location
[deleted] t1_j55jb0m wrote
AndreaRose223 t1_j55gknu wrote
Reply to Ancient humans and their early depictions of the universe: “It is no exaggeration to say that astronomy has existed as an exact science for more than five millennia,” writes the late science historian John North. by clayt6
When I was in the Navy 20 years ago and I was sailing in the central Pacific under Darken Ship conditions and not another shop for miles over the horizon, I saw more stars in the sky than I knew possible. It was like looking out from the ISS.
MoistBrownTowel t1_j55g58u wrote
Reply to comment by lunchbox377 in Ancient humans and their early depictions of the universe: “It is no exaggeration to say that astronomy has existed as an exact science for more than five millennia,” writes the late science historian John North. by clayt6
I wasn’t trying to admit he was right or anything. I just thought his ideas were entertaining for tv purposes
84camaroguy t1_j555tof wrote
Reply to comment by kmcclry in Ancient humans and their early depictions of the universe: “It is no exaggeration to say that astronomy has existed as an exact science for more than five millennia,” writes the late science historian John North. by clayt6
What you’ve mentioned is part of it, but we’ve done comparisons in bright sunlight through a magnified optic with similar results. She just does t resolve the detail that I do. Like the comment under yours though, she can differentiate more colours than I can.
Mutex70 t1_j555k0n wrote
Reply to comment by PoppersOfCorn in Does it bother you that you won't be alive when we discover aliens & start to colonise other worlds by [deleted]
>We will have evolved to the needs of our environments
This literally means the environment needs something, and we evolve to meet it.
The sentence "Hank provides for the needs of his children" means Hank's children have needs, not Hank himself. Same thing here.
It may not be what you meant, but it is what you wrote.
Additionally, "need" is a vague term which does not capture the driving force behind evolution.
Imagine a species that has all its needs met. There is more than enough food for the current population, no predators, but the species is limited to one offspring every 10 years, and typically have 30 years when they can produce offspring.
A mutation occurs, and this new member of the species can have offspring every 5 years. In this case, even though all of the "needs" of the species are being met, that mutation will likely out-compete the trait of having offspring every 10 years. The species will evolve, even though all its "needs" were being met.
aspheric_cow t1_j550grg wrote
Reply to comment by fuer_den_Kaiser in Are Two Tidally Locked Earth in One Solar System Possible? by Thirdy-DOg
Tidal friction is caused by the planet's rotation. The tidal force deform the planet, and the rotation drags the deformed shape to be misaligned with the moon.
Rivetingcactus t1_j550a21 wrote
Reply to Ancient humans and their early depictions of the universe: “It is no exaggeration to say that astronomy has existed as an exact science for more than five millennia,” writes the late science historian John North. by clayt6
Such a shame the conquistadors destroyed so much
Rdtadmscksdnkydk t1_j54zi9x wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in Ancient humans and their early depictions of the universe: “It is no exaggeration to say that astronomy has existed as an exact science for more than five millennia,” writes the late science historian John North. by clayt6
The "wow muh post history?!" Is such a weird thing to bring to me. It takes 2 clicks to get to your post history, and it's just as easy to read as your comment here.
Its very much an intended feature of this website.
dashingstag t1_j54z8wz wrote
Reply to Ancient humans and their early depictions of the universe: “It is no exaggeration to say that astronomy has existed as an exact science for more than five millennia,” writes the late science historian John North. by clayt6
I have always found it ironic that the more advanced we get the less we see of the sky
JarrodBaniqued OP t1_j54yxr9 wrote
Reply to comment by CrimsonEnigma in Question: Who holds the record for longest time between astronaut selection and first spaceflight? by JarrodBaniqued
That might be it
CrimsonEnigma t1_j54y447 wrote
Reply to Question: Who holds the record for longest time between astronaut selection and first spaceflight? by JarrodBaniqued
I believe it was Don Lind, who was selected in April 1966. He was backup for some Skylab missions, but didn’t actually fly until STS-51-B in April 1985, 19 years later.
We *might* also count Joe Engle. He was also a part of the April 1966 group, but had his first flight on STS-2 in November 1981, so only 14 1/2 years after selection. However, that’s only his NASA selection - he was also selected by the Air Force in the third Aerospace Research Pilot School class in 1961, which would put his gap at around 20 years, if we’re including USAF programs in addition to civilian ones. However again, he flew as part of the X-15 program, and some of his flights crossed the USAF’s definition of the boundary of space (50 miles), but fell short of the FAI’s mark (100 km). If we count those flights, then his first spaceflight was X-15 Flight 138, which was in June 1965 - just a few years after his USAF selection.
space-ModTeam t1_j54xyph wrote
Reply to Question: Who holds the record for longest time between astronaut selection and first spaceflight? by JarrodBaniqued
Hello u/JarrodBaniqued, your submission "Question: Who holds the record for longest time between astronaut selection and first spaceflight?" has been removed from r/space because:
- Such questions should be asked in the "All space questions" thread stickied at the top of the sub.
Please read the rules in the sidebar and check r/space for duplicate submissions before posting. If you have any questions about this removal please message the r/space moderators. Thank you.
[deleted] t1_j55ovta wrote
Reply to if our sun is the size of an atom, how big would UY Scuti be in comparison? by Major-Apricot69
[removed]