Nitpick: Ceres is in the Asteroid Belt and was discovered in 1801. Its discovery was not unlike that of Pluto, and it was considered to be a planet until after several other asteroids were discovered.

Pluto's discovery and eventual recategorization was pretty much the same situation, except that every new Kuiper Belt Object wasn't being counted as another new planet. When Eris was discovered, which is larger than Pluto, it forced the IAU's hand in creating an actual definition for "planet".

That's a good question and I actually don't know the answer, I hope someone who knows more can answer.

Thats the difference between "would it ever be recognized as a planet again" vs "will it ever be a planet again". It was NEVER a planet based on current definitions, but it was called a planet in the past.

Is OP asking if definitions might change calling it a planet, or is op asking will it somehow fit current definitions in the future.

Hello u/twurbster, your submission "Will Pluto ever be a planet?" has been removed from r/space because:

• Such questions should be asked in the "All space questions" thread stickied at the top of the sub.

Please read the rules in the sidebar and check r/space for duplicate submissions before posting. If you have any questions about this removal please message the r/space moderators. Thank you.

So it’s really just a cool controversial asteroid?

I just wrote a kids' book about the solar system, and my take is that it's not that Pluto isn't a planet. It's that we now have so many planets we need multiple categories for them, and Pluto absolutely fits better into the "dwarf planet" category than the "rocky/inner planet" category.

Since it hasn't cleared it's orbit in the last million years it probably won't do it in the next few

What does that make Neptune if it cannot pull in Pluto?

[removed]

Fr, what’s wrong with having like 30 planets

We do, they're all dwarf planets!

If we ever change our technical definition of a "planet" then it could be recognized as one again.

Regarding your second edit, you can kind of think of it that way. The moon orbits the earth like pluto orbits the sun. However for it to be called a "moon" the object needs to be orbiting something other than a star.

[removed]

No, the other object in question is Neptune, which is much larger than pluto. Neptune would eat pluto right up.

I like to think that if Pluto works and and believes in itself, it can one day become anything it wants!!!!!!

Extremely unlikely because it crosses Neptune's path.

I am also interested in the answer to this question

I would totally be on board with having more planets. Those darn astronomers!

Will it ever clear it’s neighboring region of other objects?

It's got a lot of work to do in regards to Neptune.

[removed]

It WAS a planet. But it's now a dwarf planet. Technically it can still be seen as a planet though.

IMO Pluto lost its status because astronomers kept discovering more Pluto-sized objects orbiting the sun and they didn’t want to add a bunch of new planets. (Eris · Ceres · Haumea · Makemake)

[removed]

That isn't part of the reason it was "downgraded" to dwarf planet though... per the IAU these are the requirements:

1. It is in orbit around the Sun.
2. It has sufficient mass to assume hydrostatic equilibrium (a nearly round shape).
3. It has “cleared the neighborhood” around its orbit.

Pluto meets the first two, just not the third.