Recent comments in /f/space
SpartanJack17 t1_j5h3qx1 wrote
Hello u/lulzForMoney, your submission "Which soviet Venera programs was the most effective and astonishing?" has been removed from r/space because:
- Such questions should be asked in the "All space questions" thread stickied at the top of the sub.
Please read the rules in the sidebar and check r/space for duplicate submissions before posting. If you have any questions about this removal please message the r/space moderators. Thank you.
a10t2 t1_j5h3pe6 wrote
Reply to comment by RunLoud6534 in Not much but finally moved the the countryside and actually have a nights sky. by ProfessorEsoteric
You don’t necessarily have to choose. I’m <1 km from the local grocery store and have statistically some of the darkest skies on earth.
SpartanJack17 t1_j5h22wa wrote
Reply to Trying to observe the upcoming C/2022 E3 (ZTF) Comet with binoculars by EstablishmentOk1324
Hello u/EstablishmentOk1324, your submission "Trying to observe the upcoming C/2022 E3 (ZTF) Comet with binoculars" has been removed from r/space because:
- Such questions should be asked in the "All space questions" thread stickied at the top of the sub.
Please read the rules in the sidebar and check r/space for duplicate submissions before posting. If you have any questions about this removal please message the r/space moderators. Thank you.
[deleted] t1_j5h1gbc wrote
Reply to Photo bombed by a plane. by DBWallz
[removed]
[deleted] t1_j5gymow wrote
[deleted] t1_j5gxtun wrote
Reply to Photo bombed by a plane. by DBWallz
[removed]
FragleFameux t1_j5guulw wrote
Reply to Rosette Nebula by Kujisann
Is it naturally this pink/purple? If so, do we know the composition that gives it? Or is it only due because of the heat of that zone?
tylorr83 t1_j5gur1y wrote
Reply to The 7 second sunset aboard the International Space Station. More details in comments. by astro_pettit
still waiting for the video or gif to start playing.......
Incredible shot!
[deleted] t1_j5gumfh wrote
EmergeHolographic OP t1_j5gu3p4 wrote
Reply to Stereoscopic GIF of a NASA simulation of two binary black holes orbiting by EmergeHolographic
Credit: NASA's Goddard Space Flight Center
>A new model is bringing scientists a step closer to understanding the kinds of light signals produced when two supermassive black holes, which are millions to billions of times the mass of the Sun, spiral toward a collision. For the first time, a new computer simulation that fully incorporates the physical effects of Einstein's general theory of relativity shows that gas in such systems will glow predominantly in ultraviolet and X-ray light.
>Just about every galaxy the size of our own Milky Way or larger contains a monster black hole at its center. Observations show galaxy mergers occur frequently in the universe, but so far no one has seen a merger of these giant black holes.
>Scientists have detected merging stellar-mass black holes -- which range from around three to several dozen solar masses -- using the National Science Foundation's Laser Interferometer Gravitational-Wave Observatory (LIGO). Gravitational waves are space-time ripples traveling at the speed of light. They are created when massive orbiting objects like black holes and neutron stars spiral together and merge.
>Supermassive mergers will be much more difficult to find than their stellar-mass cousins. One reason ground-based observatories can't detect gravitational waves from these events is because Earth itself is too noisy, shaking from seismic vibrations and gravitational changes from atmospheric disturbances. The detectors must be in space, like the Laser Interferometer Space Antenna (LISA) led by ESA (the European Space Agency) and planned for launch in the 2030s.
>But supermassive binaries nearing collision may have one thing stellar-mass binaries lack -- a gas-rich environment. Scientists suspect the supernova explosion that creates a stellar black hole also blows away most of the surrounding gas. The black hole consumes what little remains so quickly there isn't much left to glow when the merger happens.
>Supermassive binaries, on the other hand, result from galaxy mergers. Each supersized black hole brings along an entourage of gas and dust clouds, stars and planets. Scientists think a galaxy collision propels much of this material toward the central black holes, which consume it on a time scale similar to that needed for the binary to merge. As the black holes near, magnetic and gravitational forces heat the remaining gas, producing light astronomers should be able to see.
>The new simulation shows three orbits of a pair of supermassive black holes only 40 orbits from merging. The models reveal the light emitted at this stage of the process may be dominated by UV light with some high-energy X-rays, similar to what's seen in any galaxy with a well-fed supermassive black hole.
>Three regions of light-emitting gas glow as the black holes merge, all connected by streams of hot gas: a large ring encircling the entire system, called the circumbinary disk, and two smaller ones around each black hole, called mini disks. All these objects emit predominantly UV light. When gas flows into a mini disk at a high rate, the disk's UV light interacts with each black hole's corona, a region of high-energy subatomic particles above and below the disk. This interaction produces X-rays. When the accretion rate is lower, UV light dims relative to the X-rays.
>Based on the simulation, the researchers expect X-rays emitted by a near-merger will be brighter and more variable than X-rays seen from single supermassive black holes. The pace of the changes links to both the orbital speed of gas located at the inner edge of the circumbinary disk as well as that of the merging black holes.
>The simulation ran on the National Center for Supercomputing Applications' Blue Waters supercomputer at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. Modeling three orbits of the system took 46 days on 9,600 computing cores.
[deleted] t1_j5gskw6 wrote
Reply to Stereoscopic GIF of a NASA simulation of two binary black holes orbiting by EmergeHolographic
[removed]
Doumtabarnack OP t1_j5gsb98 wrote
Reply to comment by the_fungible_man in Oumuamua by Doumtabarnack
I understand. Thanks for your time!
[deleted] t1_j5gq84r wrote
Reply to Stereoscopic GIF of a NASA simulation of two binary black holes orbiting by EmergeHolographic
[removed]
the_fungible_man t1_j5gq7e4 wrote
Reply to comment by Doumtabarnack in Oumuamua by Doumtabarnack
Its encounter with the Sun changed the direction of it's motion, but not its speed. It's path was bent 66° by its trip through the Sun's gravity well, but for all practical purposes – treating the Sun and Oumuamua as a simplified two body system – Oumuamua left the solar system at the same speed it entered it.
[deleted] t1_j5gpmqg wrote
Reply to Stereoscopic GIF of a NASA simulation of two binary black holes orbiting by EmergeHolographic
[removed]
space-ModTeam t1_j5gpcue wrote
Reply to Oumuamua by Doumtabarnack
Hello u/Doumtabarnack, your submission "Oumuamua" has been removed from r/space because:
- Such questions should be asked in the "All space questions" thread stickied at the top of the sub.
Please read the rules in the sidebar and check r/space for duplicate submissions before posting. If you have any questions about this removal please message the r/space moderators. Thank you.
Anonymous-USA t1_j5goyh2 wrote
Reply to comment by UmbralRaptor in Oumuamua by Doumtabarnack
Yup… it’s all relative (in this case the motion vector and current distance)
[deleted] t1_j5goiry wrote
Reply to Photo bombed by a plane. by DBWallz
[removed]
[deleted] t1_j5go5d7 wrote
Reply to Photo bombed by a plane. by DBWallz
[removed]
Doumtabarnack OP t1_j5gmpip wrote
Reply to comment by UmbralRaptor in Oumuamua by Doumtabarnack
Do we know if its turn around the sun increased its current velocity relative to us or decreased it?
UmbralRaptor t1_j5gm1e8 wrote
Reply to Oumuamua by Doumtabarnack
There's two things going on here:
-
escape velocity is related to distance. eg: Solar escape is ~42 km/s at Earth's distance, but some 600 km/s if you start at the photosphere. see eg: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Voyager_2#/media/File:Voyager_2_velocity_vs_distance_from_sun.svg for how it falls off.
-
The 26 km/s is a hyperbolic excess velocity. Not so much its current speed (though this is quite close), as how fast it would be going in an idealized case where it can get arbitrarily far from the Sun and we can ignore the rest of the galaxy, etc.
[deleted] t1_j5gkugz wrote
Reply to This company just launched a app that allows anyone to purchase satellite imagery. by c4chop
[removed]
gwaydms t1_j5gk9t8 wrote
Reply to comment by just-me1995 in Photo bombed by a plane. by DBWallz
You don't know what we can find
shelbydiamondstar OP t1_j5gj6ke wrote
Reply to comment by wrappedupinemotion in Rare December bloom in Anza Borrego makes for a wonderful foreground to frame Orion with! (California) by shelbydiamondstar
I've heard the flowers have gotten better since. They've had so much rain!
thatwasacrapname123 t1_j5h451d wrote
Reply to comment by theillini19 in Not much but finally moved the the countryside and actually have a nights sky. by ProfessorEsoteric
Scorpio is partially visible below