Recent comments in /f/space
[deleted] t1_j5ngaao wrote
alextxdro t1_j5newmm wrote
Shhhhcchhwwwaaaaaaaiiiiiiiishshshshcckkrrrrrrkkkcchcjccjwaaaaaeeeeeeyyyyushshsh….etc…..
ghostoftheai t1_j5neitn wrote
Reply to comment by Bipogram in Have you ever thought about what it sounds on jupiter by Western_Home6746
So if it’s as dense as rock can you walk on it or is that not how it works?
[deleted] t1_j5ndr3v wrote
Reply to Orion with 60 year old lens. by Acuate187
[deleted]
Robert_The_Red t1_j5ncioj wrote
Reply to comment by vanearthquake in NASA suspends efforts to fully deploy Lucy solar array by ye_olde_astronaut
More like, played a lot of ksp.
ACowAndAWaffle t1_j5nad4n wrote
I would like to know what it sounds like under the surface of the hydrogen ocean…
AVBforPrez t1_j5n8ntx wrote
I'll do you one better - what do you think it looks like/sounds like in the middle of the permanent octagon of rotating storms at the north pole of Saturn?
Assuming it's not some weird thing we don't understand yet, it's probably the most chaotic thing we know of in our solar system as of now.
EmergeHolographic OP t1_j5n6wgg wrote
Reply to comment by underslunghero in Stereoscopic GIF of a NASA simulation of two binary black holes orbiting by EmergeHolographic
I hear you. Never my intention to mislead! I struggle with explaining this in a way that everyone seems to be happy with 😅
I'm open to feedback on what makes for a more accurate title
Uninvalidated t1_j5n6syb wrote
Reply to I have a thought? by ElderberryBudget4231
> there was some way I could figure out if I'm anywhere correct in my thought process.
Try reading up on the science and reflect upon it without being high as a kite for example, and you might see a few flaws in your thought process.
Just think for a bit, how the hell would you collect and separate Moscovium that breaks down to other elements in the very best case in half a second?
Also. Bob Lazar is a complete fraud. He's a grifter saying bullshit to make money on people who's easy to fool.
ElderberryBudget4231 OP t1_j5n6qco wrote
Reply to comment by Kinis_Deren in I have a thought? by ElderberryBudget4231
But what if they're in fact isn't a stable isotope, who's to say the unstable isotope is the reason for its unnatural Behavior? Or maybe Earth just doesn't qualify for the conditions for the unstable isotope to become a stable isotope. I am a high school dropout, so I have a lot more research to do regarding Isotopes in the properties and pretty much everything involving the production of heavy elements or any element to be exact.
Uninvalidated t1_j5n5szj wrote
Reply to comment by Nero3k in I have a thought? by ElderberryBudget4231
He's a complete scam who spits lies, because those who believe in these kind of lies can also be grifted upon.
He's playing the same game as Avi Loeb with his Oumuamua being an alien artifact bullshit.
[deleted] t1_j5n524z wrote
Reply to comment by Jamaicab in Stereoscopic GIF of a NASA simulation of two binary black holes orbiting by EmergeHolographic
[removed]
Kinis_Deren t1_j5n4a3q wrote
Reply to I have a thought? by ElderberryBudget4231
Supernovae are the natural source of heavy element production in the universe. With that being said, if there was a stable isotope of element 115, we'd expect to have discovered it on Earth so I'm very doubtful of Lazar's claims.
White holes are a valid solution to Einsten' field equations with certain constraints applied. If they existed, they would be the brightest objects in the universe. We've yet to observe a white hole so it appears they are a mathematical curiosity rather than a reality.
Nero3k t1_j5n4a17 wrote
Reply to I have a thought? by ElderberryBudget4231
Bob Lazar? He’s been on my radar since the 90’s. I still have no idea if he’s a scammer or legit.
Jamaicab t1_j5n3ryi wrote
Reply to comment by Nowin in Stereoscopic GIF of a NASA simulation of two binary black holes orbiting by EmergeHolographic
A schooner IS a sailboat, stupid-head.
JennaLS t1_j5n3cgg wrote
Reply to Not much but finally moved the the countryside and actually have a nights sky. by ProfessorEsoteric
I get such a thrill when it's a clear night sky. Living within so many miles of a major city obviously robs my view, which is why taking a road trip to a good stargazing spot is on my bucket list.
Joseph_of_the_North t1_j5n2u5a wrote
Reply to I have a thought? by ElderberryBudget4231
White holes are purely theoretical, and if they do exist they're in an alternate universe.
But black holes are the most powerful objects in the universe, you might be able to harvest material from their jets.
Own_Praline_6277 t1_j5n2he2 wrote
Reply to I have a thought? by ElderberryBudget4231
I'm not really able to follow your thought process here, but the half life of all isotopes of Moscovium are on the order of ms. So, it'd be pretty useless as anything other than an alpha source.
underslunghero t1_j5n2953 wrote
Reply to Stereoscopic GIF of a NASA simulation of two binary black holes orbiting by EmergeHolographic
How do I simultaneously vote for "this is cool" and "totally misleading title"
Sumpkit t1_j5n1fih wrote
Reply to comment by philharlow in NASA suspends efforts to fully deploy Lucy solar array by ye_olde_astronaut
Quick, someone call Alec Baldwin
pzerr t1_j5n19n1 wrote
Reply to comment by Bensemus in Space insurers toast another profitable year. The space insurance market managed to make a profit for 2022 despite a devastating Vega C rocket failure at the end of the year that ruined two Airbus imaging satellites. by EricFromOuterSpace
Excess profits year after year are not right.
Having excess profits for a couple years after some years of losses is fine. Space launches are rather a unique and relatively small market and a few bad launches to make for a bad year.
Azagar_Omiras t1_j5mzbhj wrote
Reply to comment by BDR529forlyfe in Have you ever thought about what it sounds on jupiter by Western_Home6746
Not with attitude, you won't.
Firebrand713 t1_j5my6d3 wrote
Are there meteors and other giant rocks floating somewhere above the “surface” of Jupiter?
Are sky islands possible there?
Chicken_Teeth t1_j5mxul9 wrote
Reply to comment by shotsallover in NASA suspends efforts to fully deploy Lucy solar array by ye_olde_astronaut
We can send a tiny rocket loaded with WD-40 up there. Should need less force to launch less mass. Then just let off a little pressurized WD-40 from time to time to build speed in the vacuum. Or set up a planetary slingshot.
thegagis t1_j5ngaep wrote
Reply to Do you think we will ever be able to communicate faster than the speed of light using entangled particles? by DefenderOfTheButter
No. The entanglement has to do with the result of a truly unknown unmeasured state. It cannot be used to transmit information.
And thats not a technical limitation, its not possible even on a theoretical level