[removed]

There is no proof that the universe rotates

The surface of a gas giant is defined separately from the core, as the article says: "...there is no solid ground, the surface of Jupiter is defined as the point where the atmospheric pressure is equal to that of Earth."

Hello u/Aggressive-Falcon198, your submission "We live on gods left testicle." has been removed from r/space because:

• No shitposts

Please read the rules in the sidebar and check r/space for duplicate submissions before posting. If you have any questions about this removal please message the r/space moderators. Thank you.

[removed]

We are made of spheres that rotate in circles that live on a sphere that rotates in circles that is itself in a sphere that goes in a circle.

[removed]

I started laughing when you switched from "nut" to "nutt" sentence 5 lol "Look at an alien, they look like cracked out sharks". "Fuck mermaids, mermaids are aliens". This shit is fuegs

[removed]

Butt out the blunt and back away from the keyboard.

[removed]

It could be two saiyan pods simultaneously entering earths atmosphere together

[removed]

You can MEASURE the spin or charge of an entangled pair, but altering it to a spesific outcome means you break the entanglement. The FTL communication is properly impossible.

It may have uses in quantum computing or cryptography, but communication it is not.

"NASA Slammed into Bankruptcy by Capitalist Critics as Efforts to Fully Deploy Lucy Solar Array Come to a Halt, Global Economic Meltdown Imminent and Housing Prices rise yet AGAIN!”

I knew about methane, but only just learning about ethanol now, and found a 2011 paper about interstellar ethanol. But what I can’t find is the astrochemical model for how this ethanol is thought to originate from non-biotic processes??? Is there an abiotic process for the genesis of ethanol? Here on earth you’re pretty well restricted to bacteria or yeast options to ferment glucose.

Sorry to piggy back your comment, but do you happen to know of the process or can you point me to a good source about this topic since you had a pre-existing familiarity with it?

Almost positive this has already been done. Only saying "almost" because I wasn't in the (well documented) room.

Entangle two particles, whatever happens to the first happens to the second...regardless of distance separating them.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantum_entanglement

If a person were to say, alter the spin or charge of a quantum entangled pair of particles, the same alteration happens to the entangled pair....in real time. No delay, regardless of distance.

The Chinese have already used quantum entangled particles to demonstrate FTL communication between their terrestrial comms and their space station. Old news.

This is not a question of whether?...it's a question of what's next?

To be honest we have know about these for decades. Its not really a big break through, just more akin to a routine observation with a high precision instrument.

[removed]

If we ever actually even measure the speed of non reflected light using entanglement. I'll form an opinion on this. Until then, I'm extremely sceptical.

Entangled particles can transport information instantly and can well be used for transmission of information, used eg in quantum cyrptography. It will probably depend on the definition of "faster of tje speed of light" as you would have to separate two entangled particles (or more btw) and transport one portion with the (current known) restriction of the relativity theory to another place - probably far below the speed of light. I'd believe that the use of entangled particles would probably be rather a "secret" communication tool as it probably will not become cheap and has some restrictions like limited amount of information. However it does not need any direct line of communication.

Check out "Cool Worlds" on youtube.

They have several FTL theoretical episodes for travel and communication and go into the theories really well.

The answer is generally a no due to causality, even when you put aside a lot of physical rules.

[removed]

By all current understanding it doesn't appear possible. Beyond the immediate problem of biasing wave function collapse, it seems that any attempt at communication or travel faster than light invokes the potential for causality violation.

NASA also had a YouTube video on the sounds of a black hole. It was creepy.