Recent comments in /f/space

Steven-Maturin t1_j5ow3cy wrote

We could have had the ability to fly around the solar system in days or weeks by the 70's if we had embraced nuclear pulsed propulsion ala Project Orion. But the big babies who worried about setting off thousands of nuclear explosions in the Earth's atmosphere nixed it.

We could still build an Orion spacecraft today. Those things would be the size and weight of battleships.

"A nuclear pulse drive starship powered by fusion-antimatter catalyzed nuclear pulse propulsion units would be similarly in the 10% range and pure Matter-antimatter annihilation rockets would be theoretically capable of obtaining a velocity between 50% to 80% of the speed of light. In each case saving fuel for slowing down halves the maximum speed.At 0.1c, Orion thermonuclear starships would require a flight time of at least 44 years to reach Alpha Centauri, not counting time needed to reach that speed (about 36 days at constant acceleration of 1g or 9.8 m/s2). At 0.1c, an Orion starship would require 100 years to travel 10 light years. The astronomer Carl Sagan suggested that this would be an excellent use for current stockpiles of nuclear weapons."

1

The-Juggernaut_ t1_j5our0m wrote

Never. Solar Systems will be established, there will be travel, communication, and trade within those systems, but space is too big for a civilization like we have on earth. Travel between systems will take thousands of years, so there will be local systems, but flying around the galaxy all Willy Nilly will probably never happen. This is all if we don’t destroy ourselves. But hopefully I’m wrong and some wicked technology comes around that is economically efficient enough to allow the traversal of long distances similar to what airplanes do, but idk seems far fetched.

1

CloverArms t1_j5osy2g wrote

It's nice to imagine it, however if there's no real functioning prototypes, speculating how long it'll take is moot. The space shuttle first launched 42 years ago. One would think that we've be closer to manned earthly space travel by now. Any advancements over 4 decades I would consider it to be fairly small. The cost gap is astronomical and a diminishing return for almost any company seeking immediate profit.

The sad truth is with the way we're going on this planet, we might never get there before the next mass extinction - except this one will be artificially created.

I'm not a pessimist, just trying to be real. Peace!

2

MarkGibb67 t1_j5osspl wrote

I don't fully understand your example. If you're just talking about small vehicles taking years to reach another solar system, then I think a launch like that could happen soon, like in the next century or two. There would have to be breakthroughs in propulsion. I'm talking about a vehicle with actual functionality, with GNC and comms to earth.

I think we will never be able to exceed the speed of light. It's just a fundamental hard reality of spacetime. So, for practical purposes, humans will never reach other star systems like in science fiction. Of course, there are ideas for generation ships that take decades or hundreds of years to reach other stars. I think something like that is far off, maybe never.

2

space-ModTeam t1_j5oroou wrote

Hello u/Funkadelick99, your submission "Earth's Core Rotation is about to Reverse. Just like the Poles. Not Good. A Precursor to a Mass Extinction event." has been removed from r/space because:

  • It has a sensationalised or misleading title.

Please read the rules in the sidebar and check r/space for duplicate submissions before posting. If you have any questions about this removal please message the r/space moderators. Thank you.

1

echochamber4liberals t1_j5oqyth wrote

I believe some humans on earth currently possess "UFO" type ships with antigravity. I don't think they will voluntarily share this tech... I think it will be after the real world war 3, after the human population is brought down significantly before that tech is shared with ALL of humanity, albeit a much smaller humanity. If you really think about it, humanity as it is, is too irresponsible for that tech.

All that said, I give it 200-400 years before bebop

−2

thrivinglifev3 t1_j5oqs4y wrote

Hey OP, I read about the core reversal yesterday too and it's such an interesting phenomenon! But I do want to counter any misinformation: this is a normal, non-cataclysmic event that happens every 35-70 years.

The articles that I read say that the new study showed that the reversal might happen more like every 70 years, where some scientists thought previously it was every 35. The last time it did so prior to 2009 (on which this latest study was focused) was in the late 60s/early 70s, and besides some pretty spectacular music, there wasn't a cataclysm.

Here's some good non-sensationalized reporting on it:

https://interestingengineering.com/science/earths-inner-core-rotation-paused-reversed

Wouldn't mind the ETs appearing, though, that would be awesome! 😆

16