Recent comments in /f/space
NorCalNavyMike t1_j5tykfb wrote
Reply to comment by tripy75 in Hey, can someone explain to me why we are not stending nuclear waste into space having a reliable rocket that can carry a decent amounts of cargo? I'm thinking about Falcon Heavy. One start a year would mean that US doesn't need to store anymore waste underground. by William0fBaskerville
I’m just happy as Hell that folks are even spelling “Kurzgesagt” correctly!! Let alone referencing the incredibly delicious, buttery goodness that is this amazing destination on YouTube.
For any of y’all that haven’t seen them before, consider today your birthday and chosen major holiday coming early this year!!
>https://youtube.com/@kurzgesagt
jefferios t1_j5tqtl4 wrote
Rocket Lab already has another Electron vehicle being prepared in their Wallops facility now. Then around May, they'll launch another Electron with the TROPICS mission to study tropical systems.
The Neutron structure is also in place near the Mid Atlantic Regional Spaceport. Rocket Lab is growing fast. I wish them success.
[deleted] t1_j5tqe0o wrote
[deleted] t1_j5tmch4 wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_j5tm9d3 wrote
Reply to comment by Adeldor in NASA to test nuclear thermal rocket engine for the first time in 50 years | CNN by dem676
[removed]
Adeldor t1_j5tm2oh wrote
Reply to comment by FrostyAcanthocephala in NASA to test nuclear thermal rocket engine for the first time in 50 years | CNN by dem676
Referring to the earlier comments, I think it is what we're discussing - the pure "unburned" form being relatively safe.
FrostyAcanthocephala t1_j5tkjqp wrote
Reply to comment by Adeldor in NASA to test nuclear thermal rocket engine for the first time in 50 years | CNN by dem676
Yeah, that photo doesn't tell me much about the relative dangers. I get that it's fairly safe in a puck as an alpha emitter, but that's not really the danger we are discussing, is it?
the6thReplicant t1_j5tjlig wrote
Reply to comment by the_zelectro in Arrakhis: The tiny satellite aiming to reveal what dark matter is made of | "The European Space Agency (ESA) recently announced a new mission of its science program: a small telescope orbiting the Earth dubbed Arrakhis." by Tao_Dragon
Other than evidence for it. But I’m sure you’re right. /s
Adeldor t1_j5tjf6q wrote
Reply to comment by FrostyAcanthocephala in NASA to test nuclear thermal rocket engine for the first time in 50 years | CNN by dem676
He's more or less right. In its pure form it's as much dangerous from its heavy metal qualities as it is from radiation, hence the person holding this 90% pure plutonium puck wearing gloves.
xandr3n t1_j5th0h8 wrote
Reply to 2024 Eclipse - Best Locations by procyons2stars
Spring in the Midwest is definitely not a guaranteed blue sky day. April 8th could be 65F and sunny or 30F and snowing. Heck, it could be 30F and perfectly crisp blue skies. I would say you have a 50% shot of a clear day and a 30% chance of a warm day. But if it isn’t going to be clear or warm, you would know multiple days in advance.
[deleted] t1_j5tgvhs wrote
Reply to comment by ShittyBeatlesFCPres in NASA to test nuclear thermal rocket engine for the first time in 50 years | CNN by dem676
[removed]
Right-Oil-7116 t1_j5tgl6p wrote
Reply to 2024 Eclipse - Best Locations by procyons2stars
Indiana is humid. Growing up there, I remember completely cloud-free days being special rather than the norm. I was in Indiana during the 2017 eclipse, there were clouds but I was still able to see it (either through the clouds or in between clouds passing iirc).
1500mgsalt t1_j5tggc8 wrote
Reply to 2024 Eclipse - Best Locations by procyons2stars
I’m planning to give Carbondale, IL a shot and hope for the best.
Decronym t1_j5tfnyv wrote
Acronyms, initialisms, abbreviations, contractions, and other phrases which expand to something larger, that I've seen in this thread:
|Fewer Letters|More Letters| |-------|---------|---| |LEO|Low Earth Orbit (180-2000km)| | |Law Enforcement Officer (most often mentioned during transport operations)| |NERVA|Nuclear Engine for Rocket Vehicle Application (proposed engine design)| |NTP|Nuclear Thermal Propulsion| | |Network Time Protocol| |NTR|Nuclear Thermal Rocket| |RTG|Radioisotope Thermoelectric Generator|
^(5 acronyms in this thread; )^(the most compressed thread commented on today)^( has 12 acronyms.)
^([Thread #8482 for this sub, first seen 25th Jan 2023, 13:17])
^[FAQ] ^([Full list]) ^[Contact] ^([Source code])
[deleted] t1_j5tfhjp wrote
[deleted] t1_j5tf42x wrote
Reply to comment by DistressedApple in Hey, can someone explain to me why we are not stending nuclear waste into space having a reliable rocket that can carry a decent amounts of cargo? I'm thinking about Falcon Heavy. One start a year would mean that US doesn't need to store anymore waste underground. by William0fBaskerville
[removed]
[deleted] t1_j5tepcu wrote
binary_spaniard t1_j5teh2c wrote
Reply to comment by ChefExellence in Rocket Lab launches 3 satellites in first mission from U.S. soil by Robb4848
Like Astra can pay for many engines if they don't sell launches.
WranglerOfTheTards27 t1_j5teh05 wrote
Reply to comment by jalle007 in NASA to test nuclear thermal rocket engine for the first time in 50 years | CNN by dem676
What is blud waffling about
FerrowFarm t1_j5tcodw wrote
Reply to Hey, can someone explain to me why we are not stending nuclear waste into space having a reliable rocket that can carry a decent amounts of cargo? I'm thinking about Falcon Heavy. One start a year would mean that US doesn't need to store anymore waste underground. by William0fBaskerville
I imagine the question is not "where would we store the waste?" but rather "Where would we build the plants?" Most people have a NIMBY feeling toward nuclear, despite it being the greenest and most efficient fuel to date.
jalle007 t1_j5tc99z wrote
They LIE as soon they open their dirty mouth. NASA scam of the Earth
haruku63 t1_j5tc45a wrote
Reply to In 1971, three cosmonauts Dobrovolski, Volkov, and Patsayev passed away due to a valve malfunction in the Soyuz 11 capsule. They remain the only people who have passed away above the Kármán Line - the defining line of space. by sciencekenyon
The photo shows the originally planned crew of Valeri N. Kubasov, left, Aleksei A. Leonov, and Pyotr I. Kolodin. It was replaced a few days before launch by the backup crew.
https://www.nasa.gov/feature/50-years-ago-remembering-the-crew-of-soyuz-11
Poop_Taxi t1_j5tc10f wrote
Reply to comment by procyons2stars in 2024 Eclipse - Best Locations by procyons2stars
Texas has many cloud free days
akriti12_ t1_j5tznqe wrote
Reply to In 1971, three cosmonauts Dobrovolski, Volkov, and Patsayev passed away due to a valve malfunction in the Soyuz 11 capsule. They remain the only people who have passed away above the Kármán Line - the defining line of space. by sciencekenyon
How did they die and what happened to their bodies?