Recent comments in /f/space
[deleted] t1_j606qmv wrote
Rokku0702 t1_j606dg3 wrote
Reply to comment by oalfonso in Earth's inner core may be slowing down, but “Nothing cataclysmic is happening,” says Hrvoje Tkalcic, a geophysicist at Australian National University. “The inner core is now more in sync with the rest of the planet than a decade ago when it was spinning a bit faster.” by clayt6
Why would it effect the tides? Tides are lunar based are they not?
Different_Muscle_116 OP t1_j606ar9 wrote
Reply to comment by Waddensky in How come space probes generally take photos of moons or asteroids from several hundred (or thousands) of kilometers away from the object they orbit? by Different_Muscle_116
Okay Juno took photos of Io some of which were from several hundred to a thousand kilometers away.
I assume that IO has less gravity well than Earth. There are objects even smaller than Io that have had photos taken from orbits as well.
I always wonder why they can’t orbit closer and get even greater surface detail.
I’m basing an assumption that an object with less mass (like an asteroid or a moon) can be orbited much closer than a satellite around the Earth before the gravity well becomes an issue.
Are these missions at their absolute closest orbits possible given the fuel reserves?
Kullenbergus t1_j6066i0 wrote
Reply to How come space probes generally take photos of moons or asteroids from several hundred (or thousands) of kilometers away from the object they orbit? by Different_Muscle_116
In many cases they are flybys and need to be at exact distans to slingshot to next target or just to be able to stay in orbital range
[deleted] t1_j605mbv wrote
Different_Muscle_116 OP t1_j605a8l wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in How come space probes generally take photos of moons or asteroids from several hundred (or thousands) of kilometers away from the object they orbit? by Different_Muscle_116
100-50k above the surface but as close as possible enough to orbit
Waddensky t1_j60598h wrote
Reply to How come space probes generally take photos of moons or asteroids from several hundred (or thousands) of kilometers away from the object they orbit? by Different_Muscle_116
I'm not really sure what you mean, how else would they be able to take photos? The Voyagers and New Horizons spacecraft weren't in orbit, but they performed a fly-by.
[deleted] t1_j603tb8 wrote
Reply to What time is it on the Moon? - Satellite navigation systems for lunar settlements will require local atomic clocks. Scientists are working out what time they will keep. by speckz
Really cool, interesting things to consider. Wait until we get lunar trains and they will need to work out which lunar time zone to leave at
rocketsocks t1_j603c7x wrote
Reply to What time is it on the Moon? - Satellite navigation systems for lunar settlements will require local atomic clocks. Scientists are working out what time they will keep. by speckz
Spoilers: it's going to be UT/GMT for a long time until someone figures out something better.
qetral t1_j600okj wrote
It's dated, but Cosmos (the book) by Carl Sagan got me interested.
[deleted] t1_j5zy16l wrote
patasthrowaway t1_j5zx9em wrote
Won't be visible with the naked eye right? 20 times smaller than the ISS and 20 times farther away
[deleted] t1_j5zvycv wrote
Vertigomums19 t1_j5zvma8 wrote
Reply to comment by Sledgehammer925 in Netflix Special Challenger The Final Flight - curious omission. by GhostRiders
I was going to ask “who produced it? Who funded the documentary?” That can sway the lean.
Gutotito t1_j5zuh7v wrote
Reply to comment by oalfonso in Earth's inner core may be slowing down, but “Nothing cataclysmic is happening,” says Hrvoje Tkalcic, a geophysicist at Australian National University. “The inner core is now more in sync with the rest of the planet than a decade ago when it was spinning a bit faster.” by clayt6
"Some," yes, but almost certainly nothing we'd notice. The core is still spinning, it's just the differential between the crust and the core that has decreased.
[deleted] t1_j5zu9b5 wrote
[removed]
Raddish_ t1_j5ztnzw wrote
Reply to comment by farticustheelder in Mycotecture — the use of mushrooms and other fungal substances for architectural purposes — could be key to building affordable, fire-resistant, insulated habitats on the Moon and Mars. NASA aims to experiment with the technique on the Moon in 2025. by clayt6
As Shakespeare might put it:
There are more reagents to this organic chemistry, Horatio, then are stored in your moon rock.
[deleted] t1_j5ztg92 wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in Earth's inner core may be slowing down, but “Nothing cataclysmic is happening,” says Hrvoje Tkalcic, a geophysicist at Australian National University. “The inner core is now more in sync with the rest of the planet than a decade ago when it was spinning a bit faster.” by clayt6
[removed]
PhrenchPlatypus t1_j5zt9hj wrote
Reply to comment by not_that_planet in A New View of the Most Explosive Moon in the Solar System by ChickenTeriyakiBoy1
That would leave quite the trail.
akriti12_ t1_j606wkq wrote
Reply to comment by KAugsburger in In 1971, three cosmonauts Dobrovolski, Volkov, and Patsayev passed away due to a valve malfunction in the Soyuz 11 capsule. They remain the only people who have passed away above the Kármán Line - the defining line of space. by sciencekenyon
So they must've been forced to let the air out of their lungs out, or rupture of lungs? Terrible way to die, seeing life get sucked out of you and your mates