Recent comments in /f/space
HoloceneHorrors t1_j6etnaw wrote
Reply to comment by FireFromThaumaturgy in What if our sun was a part of another constellation on another planet? by smilingpike31
It's been such a long wait, but I'm happy it became popular enough from Netflix to get us that damn movie! =D
[deleted] t1_j6etjxx wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_j6eti8m wrote
Reply to comment by collegefurtrader in Hypothetical question about centrifugal force? by morphikk
[removed]
[deleted] t1_j6etfiq wrote
Reply to comment by collegefurtrader in Hypothetical question about centrifugal force? by morphikk
[removed]
morbyxxx t1_j6etez1 wrote
Tracking looks okay, just need more magnification i think to get detail. This is just my opinion, know how hard it is and i commend you efforts.
coleisman t1_j6erqqz wrote
not likely to be. our star isn’t particularly bright as stars go, most of the stars in our constellations are tens to thousands of times more luminous than our sun.
even if visible it wouldn’t stand out at all and wouldn’t likely be in a constellation unless they were at alpha centauri.
HIMP_Dahak_172291 t1_j6erdci wrote
Reply to comment by UHF1211 in Asteroids sudden flyby shows blind spot in planetary threat detection by coinfanking
Close nuclear detonations would still push the asteroid simply by differential heating and vaporizing the rock on the facing side. Not much of a push, but it is one. Nukes might be the only recourse for rubble asteroids too. You'd have to have the warhead on a robot that would push itself inside before detonating for it to do any good, but I can't think of a better option.
Anonymous-USA t1_j6er949 wrote
Absolutely. The two are independent forces in perpendicular directions.
Textipulator t1_j6er2we wrote
Our sun IS factually part of a constellation, the real question is, is it part of one, named by aliens.
[deleted] t1_j6eqjxw wrote
Reply to comment by UnbelievableTxn6969 in Asteroids sudden flyby shows blind spot in planetary threat detection by coinfanking
[removed]
MisinformedGenius t1_j6eootv wrote
Reply to comment by corsairealgerien in Number of manned orbital launches by year, 1961-2022 by firefly-metaverse
I mean, NASA did the same thing - we were way behind the Soviets when Kennedy started the Apollo program.
malex117 t1_j6eobfo wrote
Reply to comment by VertigoOne1 in What if our sun was a part of another constellation on another planet? by smilingpike31
This was amazing information thank you! Please take my poor award 🥇
AstronomicVerse OP t1_j6eo3c7 wrote
Reply to comment by pruntidjuu in Aldebaran and the legacy of Arabic star names by AstronomicVerse
Yep, the “al” got me interested in the name and started digging into it!
[deleted] t1_j6en7w5 wrote
[removed]
Norwester77 t1_j6emowu wrote
Reply to comment by citybadger in What if our sun was a part of another constellation on another planet? by smilingpike31
Plus, the sun rotates on its axis about once a month (the actual rotation rate varies depending on the latitude, which is possible because the sun isn’t rigid), so we get a regular look at every part of its surface.
[deleted] t1_j6el9es wrote
Reply to comment by Norwester77 in What if our sun was a part of another constellation on another planet? by smilingpike31
[removed]
[deleted] t1_j6el4q8 wrote
[removed]
OnlyAstronomyFans t1_j6el3sp wrote
Reply to comment by Zero7CO in Spotted strange cluster of objects traveling across the sky this evening by hawkz40
They’ve been trying out different train configurations. Believe me it’s star link or some other low earth orbit communications satellite. We didn’t find aliens or anything.
[deleted] t1_j6ektml wrote
Reply to comment by Zero7CO in Spotted strange cluster of objects traveling across the sky this evening by hawkz40
[deleted]
DiamondHandsDarrell t1_j6ekmek wrote
Reply to comment by cursed_rumor in My first photo of the Moon through my new Celestron telescope! by cursed_rumor
That was the right move my man!
[deleted] t1_j6ekdti wrote
Reply to comment by AvcalmQ in What if our sun was a part of another constellation on another planet? by smilingpike31
[removed]
Aeromarine_eng OP t1_j6ek8v7 wrote
Reply to comment by BlazeObsidian in A tiny, moving point of light. Copies of the Photographs use for the discovery of Pluto. Credit: Lowell Observatory. January 1930 by Aeromarine_eng
A blink comparator was used.
> The photographic plates Tombaugh was comparing with this machine were 36 x 43 centimeters (14 x 17 inches), and were long exposures taken with a telescopic camera that sported a powerful 33-centimeter (13-inch) diameter lens.
https://airandspace.si.edu/stories/editorial/finding-pluto-blink-comparator
[deleted] t1_j6ek701 wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_j6ek61v wrote
[removed]
space-ModTeam t1_j6etr55 wrote
Reply to Hypothetical question about centrifugal force? by morphikk
Hello u/morphikk, your submission "Hypothetical question about centrifugal force?" has been removed from r/space because:
Please read the rules in the sidebar and check r/space for duplicate submissions before posting. If you have any questions about this removal please message the r/space moderators. Thank you.