Recent comments in /f/space
[deleted] t1_j6hmakh wrote
Reddit-runner t1_j6hm53l wrote
Reply to comment by sasko12 in NASA's 'Mega Moon Rocket' aced first flight and is ready for crewed Artemis II launch by sasko12
How ironic that the Mega moon rocket and "biggest rocket ever launched" will need an even bigger rocket to get astronauts from orbit down to the lunar surface.
Larry_Phischman t1_j6hlktj wrote
Reply to NASA tested new propulsion tech that could unlock new deep space travel possibilities by Creepy_Toe2680
The US government has a pulse detonation jet engine technology which would be useful for SSTO applications. They’ve kept it secret.
[deleted] t1_j6hl2aj wrote
[deleted] t1_j6hl17a wrote
[deleted] t1_j6hl153 wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_j6hkxlw wrote
Reply to comment by pepesilviacometh in What if the planet stopped rotating? by bubba_boo_bear
[removed]
[deleted] t1_j6hks9y wrote
[deleted] t1_j6hkpe9 wrote
Reply to comment by PandaEven3982 in What if the planet stopped rotating? by bubba_boo_bear
[removed]
Creepy_Toe2680 OP t1_j6hkn5m wrote
Reply to NASA tested new propulsion tech that could unlock new deep space travel possibilities by Creepy_Toe2680
The new tech is called a rotating detonation rocket engine, or RDRE. This propulsion system uses detonations to generate thrust. To do this, the tech relies on the accelerating of a supersonic exothermic front, which similarly creates thrust to the way a shockwave travels through the atmosphere after an explosion, which could make deep space travel easier to build for.
The point of the design is to use less fuel while also providing more thrust than the current propulsion systems that NASA and other rocket-building companies rely on. Using less fuel makes it easier to prepare these spacecraft for deep space travel, as you can mete out smaller amounts of fuel that won’t weigh down the rocket when it is lifting off.
With the success of this test, NASA is now looking at building a working, fully reusable 10,00-pound RDRE that it can then compare to the performance of traditional liquid rocket engines – like those used in the Space Launch System. If those tests prove successful, too, and the comparisons play out well, it could revolutionize how we think about deep space travel in the future.
This isn’t the only way that NASA is looking at revolutionizing deep space travel. The space agency is reportedly looking into nuclear-powered spacecraft, which would allow spacecraft to travel further distances without needing liquid fuel. It would also make the journey to Mars significantly shorter, from six months to just 45 days.
by Joshua Hawkins (not me)
Reddit-runner t1_j6hjf9x wrote
Reply to comment by Jakebsorensen in Number of manned orbital launches by year, 1961-2022 by firefly-metaverse
It seems to also include SpaceX launches not done for NASA.
Because so far there have only been 2 crewed SpaceX to the ISS per year, but the chart shows 3 launches in 2021 and 2022.
[deleted] t1_j6hi817 wrote
Reply to comment by corsairealgerien in Number of manned orbital launches by year, 1961-2022 by firefly-metaverse
[removed]
SavageRat t1_j6hhxzg wrote
Reply to comment by UHF1211 in Asteroids sudden flyby shows blind spot in planetary threat detection by coinfanking
Unless it's was a solid metal of some kind, I believe it is a given that any rock based asteroid would have some level of moisture/ice in it.
[deleted] t1_j6hhr7l wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in American astronaut and Russian cosmonaut stay united by common goal by Ok_Copy5217
[removed]
CamLwalk t1_j6hhf46 wrote
Reply to My Personal Story About Challenger by MoabEngineer
I was buying a pack of smokes at a pharmacy in albany. There was a tv behind the counter and i was looking at the launch as I waited in line then BOOM! I pointed at the screen and said "the space shuttle just exploded!" I could tell the guy didn't believe me or it didn't register what I said. He said "wow that's crazy!" dismissively and rang me up. Next day I saw him and he's like "HOLY SHIT! We're never gonna forget each other!" I guess he was right about that.
[deleted] t1_j6hh81s wrote
[removed]
Willsgb t1_j6hfbue wrote
Reply to comment by Prinzka in ‘Extraordinary’ footage shows one of the closest known approaches of a near-Earth object — On 26 Jan. 2023, asteroid 2023 BU was about 2,200 miles above the surface of the Earth by marketrent
The only good bug is a DEAD bug!
Contra1 t1_j6hez9t wrote
Reply to comment by Mishung in ‘Extraordinary’ footage shows one of the closest known approaches of a near-Earth object — On 26 Jan. 2023, asteroid 2023 BU was about 2,200 miles above the surface of the Earth by marketrent
I got the same ad run after the first so I left.
Sumwan_In_Particular t1_j6hes89 wrote
Reply to comment by HIMP_Dahak_172291 in Asteroids sudden flyby shows blind spot in planetary threat detection by coinfanking
That’s an interesting idea about the robot. I’m wondering what others think about using:
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bunker_buster
There’s a section for nuclear, an adaptation of which, might be a realistic approach delivering a nuke deeper into an asteroid. Or a train of them, hitting the same point.
Edit: I love that you mentioned rubble asteroids btw, bc we might have a better chance at rendering those (relatively) safe. I’d be most concerned if the asteroid was a large chunk of iron perhaps. I doubt the bunker buster would have nearly the intended effect.
bluereptile t1_j6hdot9 wrote
Reply to comment by Jakebsorensen in Number of manned orbital launches by year, 1961-2022 by firefly-metaverse
They are.
NASA hasn't had a manned launch since 2011 when the shuttle retired. So all the. Lie the last few years is commercial.
Mishung t1_j6hb76t wrote
Reply to comment by peteypeteypeteypete in ‘Extraordinary’ footage shows one of the closest known approaches of a near-Earth object — On 26 Jan. 2023, asteroid 2023 BU was about 2,200 miles above the surface of the Earth by marketrent
I had to watch 50 seconds of ads to watch a 16 second video of a dot
Novabella t1_j6hb5tq wrote
Really bummed I'm not gonna get to see it. It's full cloudy all week. Tonight was the least cloudy it's been in a month, and I still can't see most of the stars.
UHF1211 t1_j6ha6u7 wrote
Reply to comment by SavageRat in Asteroids sudden flyby shows blind spot in planetary threat detection by coinfanking
How do we know there would be water on an asteroid headed for earth? Not all installer objects have liquids on them. How long would it take to deduce this and would this time be better spent trying other ways of deflecting it?
Creepy_Toe2680 OP t1_j6hmcpq wrote
Reply to comment by Larry_Phischman in NASA tested new propulsion tech that could unlock new deep space travel possibilities by Creepy_Toe2680
The horizontal line at a specific impulse of 400,000 seconds represents the minimum value needed for interstellar flyby missions at 0.1c for concepts utilizing on-board propellants.
i hope we can reach it soon.