Recent comments in /f/space
Neuyerk t1_j6mz5fw wrote
iRobot sends robots to humans all the time!
They work okay.
[deleted] t1_j6mz4kx wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in Why do we send robots to Mars but not humans? by MatthewCollinsN83
[removed]
[deleted] t1_j6mz13v wrote
[deleted] t1_j6mz08l wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in Why do we send robots to Mars but not humans? by MatthewCollinsN83
[removed]
[deleted] t1_j6myqhq wrote
[removed]
LegitimateGift1792 t1_j6mynsv wrote
Reply to comment by Testimones in NASA tested new propulsion tech that could unlock new deep space travel possibilities by Creepy_Toe2680
I gave you an upvote even though you did not use the obligatory /s. It was the transparent spheres i liked the best.
[deleted] t1_j6mymvc wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_j6myfse wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_j6my5tm wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_j6my0l6 wrote
[removed]
RickAdtley t1_j6mxtvy wrote
Reply to comment by Creepy_Toe2680 in NASA tested new propulsion tech that could unlock new deep space travel possibilities by Creepy_Toe2680
Looking forward to the private spacecraft companies appropriating this and saying that "the free market" gave us deep space travel.
[deleted] t1_j6mxtin wrote
[removed]
Apophis_406 t1_j6mxq3u wrote
Imagine a plane ride that takes a year, but infinitely more dangerous. Once you arrive to your destination you find there are no return flights, and it is nothing like the tourism brochure pictured at all. That’s why we send robots.
Terminator7786 t1_j6mxbl5 wrote
Reply to comment by pruntidjuu in Aldebaran and the legacy of Arabic star names by AstronomicVerse
Don't let the rednecks in Alabama hear you say that
steven447 t1_j6mwvt2 wrote
That is the endgame, but right now that is logistically impossible. It would be a one way trip that would take at least a year to complete. You would need a ton of supplies to have the crew survive.
mytrickytrick t1_j6mwq9r wrote
Robots don't need food, water, ... For the long voyage there. They don't need a return trip back home. They can do work in more hostile environments than we can. All of that means that robots can start working there much earlier than humans can.
drunk_and_orderly t1_j6mwp1p wrote
At the present moment there isn’t much benefit to sending up humans. It would essentially be sending them there to live out their lives on Mars. For now it makes more sense to just continue collecting data until we have more advances in technology.
H-K_47 t1_j6mwkje wrote
Very expensive and very risky. We don't yet have a rocket or crew capsule capable of sending humans that far yet, let alone bringing them home. So robots have been much cheaper and safer in the meantime.
YrPrblmsArntMyPrblms t1_j6mwjyp wrote
For research. Humans can't stay there as long as robots can. Well, not yet.
Greedy-Creme-995 t1_j6mwjcq wrote
Because we do not have the technology established on Mars right now to sustain life or bring them back so basically they would be there just to die.
[deleted] t1_j6mwgac wrote
[removed]
syntaxvorlon t1_j6mw8q1 wrote
Reply to comment by FanOfPeace in 2 big pieces of space junk nearly collide in orbital 'bad neighborhood' by jeffsmith202
No, on a long enough time scale most of the junk will precipitate down onto Earth, very few orbits are so stable as to be permanent, but that would cut us off for many years.
[deleted] t1_j6mvvcl wrote
WAT0020 t1_j6mvsuw wrote
Reply to comment by everlovingkindness in Will machine learning help us find extraterrestrial life? by everlovingkindness
My latest thinking on it is we won't be doing anything until we are downloadable.
Quantum Computing- 10 years, 50, or 1000 years from now to never, I rule out never because it's happening, is a fundamental outcome of evolution, and once fully replicated we are off to meet the aliens, just one little stumbling block a vexing thing called lightspeed.
Varsect t1_j6mz8ic wrote
Reply to Why do we send robots to Mars but not humans? by MatthewCollinsN83
Because of our biology. Robots can do just fine with ×3 times less gravity and no water and food.