Recent comments in /f/space

abcxyztpgv2 t1_j7cxaxh wrote

Your answered your question with one word "believing". Sorry mate science isn't believe. Yes there is probability of aliens. We have equations like drake. But and this is big but - we haven't found one. Maybe it's as we want it to see. Maybe they have observed our solar system and are debating if Venus, earth or mars has life?

21

PerfectPercentage69 t1_j7cvu9v wrote

Not quite. There is no evidence that God or any gods exist, so it's purely faith. We have evidence that life exists on one planet (Earth), and there is an uncountable number of planets in the universe, so the probability that alien life exists is very real and not just belief/faith. Whether we'll ever find/interact with them is a different issue.

Having been contacted by aliens in the past, though, is still purely belief.

6

1992PlymouthAcclaim t1_j7cufb3 wrote

It isn't unrealistic at all if the odds of abiogenesis are prohibitively small. We can imagine all sorts of events with vanishingly small possibilities. We might not be able to wrap our human minds around the numbers involved, but that's kind of the problem: we look at the size of the known universe and say, well surely, x must have happened at least once. But without a sense of the probabilities involved, we simply do not have any reason to say whether x has happened or not.

There are plenty of conceivable events that happen precisely zero times (things that would violate the laws of physics), and we can imagine possible events that never happen at all -- simply because they are so unlikely that not even trillions of years of interactions between gazillions of particles will bring them about. We might posit that somewhere a teacup from the 1972 Sears-Roebuck catalog is orbiting a planet made of leather. This is certainly possible -- in the sense of not contradicting physical laws -- but it is so unlikely that, no matter how vast the universe is, we cannot be certain that such an item exists. Abiogenesis might simply be one of these mathematically highly unlikely events.

I'm actually not as skeptical about extraterrestrial life as I sound. I do think that, given the tendency that compounds have of quite naturally bunching together into slightly more complex compounds, it does seem reasonable to think that life is fairly abundantly distributed around the universe. But we simply don't know enough about life or about the universe yet. For aught we know, life could exist in the cores of neutron stars and on every god-forsaken rock in the universe -- or just here on this little blue rock for the past few billion years or so. Nobody knows.

5

Glum_Implement_7136 t1_j7csgbt wrote

Actually, for intelligent life to occur (and not be destroyed) there may be even more conditions to be fulfilled than the amount of galaxies.

Besides, you are looking only at one dimension here - size of the universe. There is one, even more hard to comprehend - time. And I find it entirely possible that there may have been civilizations before but what can be almost impossible - is to have the right matching for time and place.

Anyways, not taking aliens as a matter of fact is the right scientific approach for now. And probability may go to hell with such a sample size, as someone pointed above.

3

Hustler-1 t1_j7cp7sx wrote

Belief is faith. Believing in aliens is no different than believing in God. Until we get out there and find out more we could just as well be completely alone vs the universe being crowded. Doesn't mean we've always been alone or will be. But we very well could be living in a period where we are the only life in the galaxy.

14

Exact_Purchase765 t1_j7cohag wrote

I don't speak math (one of my few regrets in life), but I am pretty sure that it is a mathematical impossibility of us to be the only planet of sentient beings.

People who read and write math can correct me and I'll take it. Just seems you can't have gazillion stars and tetragazillion planets out there, it would take some serious calculations to "prove" we are as smart as it gets. . . because that really would be depressing . . .

3

KilgoreTroutPfc t1_j7clb9o wrote

What do you mean by “believe in aliens.”

“Believe in aliens” is generally shorthand for believing that aliens routinely visit Earth and possibly intervene to teach humans fire and how to build pyramids and occasionally probe the rectums of farmhands.

I think you mean, “believe life exists elsewhere in the universe.” That’s the scientific view that statistically there ought to be life elsewhere if only single celled life, but no contact has even been made nor probably ever will.

37