Recent comments in /f/space
[deleted] t1_j840dhl wrote
youcantexterminateme t1_j840bu8 wrote
Reply to comment by collegefurtrader in SpaceX on Twitter: Super Heavy Booster 7 completed a full duration static fire test of 31 Raptor engines, producing 7.9 million lbf of thrust (~3,600 metric tons) – less than half of the booster’s capability by allforspace
do you mean linear or logarithmic?
robertojh_200 t1_j83zpv5 wrote
Reply to comment by ZooZooChaCha in Blue Origin awarded NASA launch contract for Mars mission (Studying magnetic field) by kuroimakina
That’s all well and good but blue origin has not proven the ability to be successful, even with a sub orbital joyride. Throwing money at the problem won’t solve anything, this is Amazon We are talking about, Jeff Bezos. Money isn’t the issue, it’s management, it’s pipe lining, I don’t want to say it’s talent because I know there’s plenty of talented people there. But blue origin is a laughingstock in the industry for a reason, and it’s going to take more than contracts to get them to a point where they can compete with SpaceX. They already have contracts with other private launch companies, they license out their engine, but they have been holding them back because of their constant delays. If blue origin wasn’t causing so many delays, there probably would be more substantial competition in the industry right now from other launch companies.
I don’t see how they are ready for a Mars contract within the next 10 years
1800TurdFerguson t1_j83zdpy wrote
Reply to comment by sirfuzzitoes in Would you send something of yours to Space and back? by InspectorSuch7031
I regret to inform you that I have appointed myself Exalted Laird of the Universes Known and Unknown and Majordomo of the Grand Intergalactic Orgy. High Priest of the Church of Multidimensional Hedonism is still available tho.
Reddit-runner t1_j83yxxg wrote
Reply to comment by Barrrrrrnd in SpaceX on Twitter: Super Heavy Booster 7 completed a full duration static fire test of 31 Raptor engines, producing 7.9 million lbf of thrust (~3,600 metric tons) – less than half of the booster’s capability by allforspace
In addition to what others have already said: I suspect during a proper launch SpaceX will not give 100% throttle until the rocket has at least cleared to tower.
The super heavy booster with the ship on top has a thrust to weight ratio of about 1.6. This means they can throttle down to 75% and still get the rocket off the launch table.
Reddit-runner t1_j83yht1 wrote
Reply to comment by ackermann in SpaceX on Twitter: Super Heavy Booster 7 completed a full duration static fire test of 31 Raptor engines, producing 7.9 million lbf of thrust (~3,600 metric tons) – less than half of the booster’s capability by allforspace
Apparently not.
The "special concert" was spotted still in its bags a few days ago.
The new hypothesis is that SpaceX will completely remodel the area under the launch table after the frist flight. This will include a proper deluge system and the special concert.
theforeverletter t1_j83wmei wrote
I want to send up part of my ashes with a solar powered radio playing I’ve been everywhere
Sunflower_After_Dark t1_j83wlu5 wrote
You mean those really high commercial space joy rides that just dump tons of pollution into our environment so a bunch of billionaires can get their jollies? If so, why not? They gotta pay for that fuel somehow and they’ve found their mark…it’s you!
amitym t1_j83wj5k wrote
Reply to comment by b-Lox in SpaceX on Twitter: Super Heavy Booster 7 completed a full duration static fire test of 31 Raptor engines, producing 7.9 million lbf of thrust (~3,600 metric tons) – less than half of the booster’s capability by allforspace
Yeah right on.
To understand why it's no problem as this commenter said, remember that the thrust itself is comparable to forces easily within the usual realm of civil engineering tasks.
We don't use rockets to get to space because they generate cosmically far-fetched amounts of thrust, but rather because they can generate thrust reliably and continuously over an extended period, largely indifferently to the environment around them.
It's a similar principle as how a jet liner with engines capable of transporting hundreds of people at Mach 0.9 can be held in place by a couple of wooden chocks.
amitym t1_j83w12a wrote
Reply to comment by acksed in SpaceX on Twitter: Super Heavy Booster 7 completed a full duration static fire test of 31 Raptor engines, producing 7.9 million lbf of thrust (~3,600 metric tons) – less than half of the booster’s capability by allforspace
Ah a thrust connoisseur I see.
Well spotted, I say, well spotted.
BrotherBrutha t1_j83vz7s wrote
Reply to comment by sirfuzzitoes in Would you send something of yours to Space and back? by InspectorSuch7031
It’s alright, it’s a quantum title.
LurkerWithAnAccount t1_j83vw29 wrote
Reply to comment by actfatcat in SpaceX on Twitter: Super Heavy Booster 7 completed a full duration static fire test of 31 Raptor engines, producing 7.9 million lbf of thrust (~3,600 metric tons) – less than half of the booster’s capability by allforspace
You have to convert from Thrust Minutes to Earth Seconds.
sirfuzzitoes t1_j83vgo7 wrote
Reply to comment by BrotherBrutha in Would you send something of yours to Space and back? by InspectorSuch7031
I regret to inform you, I've already appointed myself Lord of the Universe. High Priest if the Universe is still available tho.
[deleted] t1_j83veqe wrote
[removed]
amitym t1_j83vdkt wrote
Reply to comment by Reliable_Redundancy in SpaceX on Twitter: Super Heavy Booster 7 completed a full duration static fire test of 31 Raptor engines, producing 7.9 million lbf of thrust (~3,600 metric tons) – less than half of the booster’s capability by allforspace
Tbf you don't need to calibrate them very carefully to get an imprecise (though presumably accurate) figure like "7.9 million."
BrotherBrutha t1_j83uwjg wrote
Reply to comment by tankflykev in Would you send something of yours to Space and back? by InspectorSuch7031
>or land in Scotland to become a laird.
If they really want a title of some kind, I’d suggest people simply choose to give themselves the title “Lord of the Universe”. It has exactly the same legitimacy as ”Laird”, is completely free, and people won’t think you are such a big arsehole ;)
[deleted] t1_j83uv6v wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_j83uk9t wrote
[removed]
Grumpy-Greybeard t1_j83u9bw wrote
No. It'd be utterly pointless.
Unless, of course, it's me that I send.
tankflykev t1_j83u5hs wrote
Nope. It’s up there in the same bucket of snake oil as naming a star, or buying a patch of land on the moon, or land in Scotland to become a laird.
kalshassan t1_j83txb0 wrote
What’s the point of doing it? This sounds a lot like you have more money than sense.
thegagis t1_j83tono wrote
I dont really own anything that would change or gain value from having been to space, so no.
sirfuzzitoes t1_j840g88 wrote
Reply to comment by 1800TurdFerguson in Would you send something of yours to Space and back? by InspectorSuch7031
Uh, can I just get in on the orgy?