Recent comments in /f/space

HungryLikeTheWolf99 t1_j8as37g wrote

Ok, so a breakdown of what happened:

Starlink provided internet in Ukraine to help keep their people informed and keep their economy running. No other company is prepared to provide this service at the level Starlink can.

Ukraine wanted to use the Starlink connections for military purposes.

Starlink was not prepared to become a military target (including their satellites). Surely there was an internal memo from the risk management department that said, in more words, "I told you so."

Starlink tries to protect the service they're providing to Ukraine and their own infrastructure in literally the only way they can: declare neutrality. (Edit: Except not neutrality, since they aren't offering the same service to Russia.)

People already upset about Elon Musk, in general, express their frustration about Starlink.

No one is upset with Hughesnet or Viasat for not providing their vastly inferior service for Ukraine.

0

simcoder t1_j8arksk wrote

Well, but couldn't you come up with a scenario where the various comms capabilities delivered by Starlink resulted in some amount of violence and possibly other stuff that wouldn't be that different from what the drones do?

1

OSFrog2023 t1_j8arbij wrote

No, eaponized drones aren't the same as Intel. One kills outright, another leads to killing. You can't supply the thing that is coordinating the killing, unless your the government that is.

1

unlimited_mcgyver t1_j8aqrl9 wrote

When it first broke I thought he may have suspended the service because the use of it by Ukraine makes starlink, spacex, and musk himself, a military target for Russia to take out.

1

New_Poet_338 t1_j8aqpm9 wrote

7

OSFrog2023 t1_j8aqers wrote

You know how illegal it would be if he didn't do what he did? It would make him an Arms Dealer. A space arms dealer. Thats the only reason why he stopped them from linking drones. Because international law forbids it. Morons.

P.s. you realize musk and Russia compete right? And that he is their number 1 competition to a monopoly they've held for a while.

2

manicdee33 t1_j8apu3t wrote

It's not a rant. It's an English translation of a German blog post.

Posting the full text of an article that's otherwise inaccessible is a thing that Redditors do from time to time.

1

manicdee33 t1_j8apn2z wrote

Ukraine switched from using Starlink for CCC to using Starlink as the communications mechanism for drones flying far behind enemy lines.

SpaceX has simply disabled the use of terrestrial Starlink for drone communications. You want in-flight internet, you subscribe to the in-flight internet service.

The rest of this article is a decent run-down of the operation of Starlink in the Ukrainian defense against the Russian invasion.

5

Ras82 t1_j8ap7q0 wrote

Yeah, the guy who spent countless millions of his own money to maintain internet for Ukrainian civilians and military is a bad faith actor... That makes total sense.

Or, since NATO is throwing billions of dollars at the Ukraine military, Musk wants them to bankroll Starlink for military purposes because as rich as he is, he doesn't have infinite capital.

−1

Ras82 t1_j8ap6sr wrote

Yeah, the guy who spent countless millions of his own money to maintain internet for Ukrainian civilians and military is a bad faith actor... That makes total sense.

Or, since NATO is throwing billions of dollars at the Ukraine military, Musk wants them to bankroll Starlink for military purposes because as rich as he is, he doesn't have infinite capital.

4

simcoder t1_j8aobv1 wrote

I've always wondered if Putey called him late one night to discuss all the folks accidentally falling out of windows and such. And then suddenly Elon had the brainstorm to buy Twitter and step out of the starlink limelight.

0