Recent comments in /f/space
[deleted] t1_j8s2pqy wrote
Reply to comment by Arbiter51x in NASA's "evolved structures" radically reduce weight – and waiting by Maxcactus
[removed]
[deleted] t1_j8s2gv7 wrote
Reply to comment by dCLCp in NASA's "evolved structures" radically reduce weight – and waiting by Maxcactus
[removed]
madscot63 t1_j8s1w1w wrote
Reply to comment by jcpmojo in The Nancy Grace Roman Space Telescope - the next major step in astronomy that will help unlock the secrets of the universe's expansion and dark energy. by upyoars
I was imagining her voice doing voice overs. <<chills>>
[deleted] t1_j8s1tds wrote
Reply to comment by bohemica_ in NASA's "evolved structures" radically reduce weight – and waiting by Maxcactus
[removed]
[deleted] t1_j8s1lvg wrote
Reply to comment by BeardySi in NASA's "evolved structures" radically reduce weight – and waiting by Maxcactus
[removed]
[deleted] t1_j8s1dmu wrote
Reply to comment by Mateorabi in NASA's "evolved structures" radically reduce weight – and waiting by Maxcactus
[removed]
[deleted] t1_j8s0ty1 wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in NASA's "evolved structures" radically reduce weight – and waiting by Maxcactus
[removed]
Starlight_XPress t1_j8rzivb wrote
Reply to comment by jcpmojo in The Nancy Grace Roman Space Telescope - the next major step in astronomy that will help unlock the secrets of the universe's expansion and dark energy. by upyoars
She’s awesome!! Story here
Pornelius_McSucc OP t1_j8rybhw wrote
Reply to comment by YpsilonY in Terraforming a magnetosphere possible? by Pornelius_McSucc
Well that no longer seems practical.
YpsilonY t1_j8rxy16 wrote
Reply to comment by Pornelius_McSucc in Terraforming a magnetosphere possible? by Pornelius_McSucc
So my back of the envelope math says heating Mars' core from 1400°C (estimated temperature, exact value unknown) to the melting point of iron of 1538°C would take 8.21*10^20J or 2.2 billion TWh. So 100.000 times the current worlds yearly energy consumption.
How you produce that energy is kind of irrelevant, but assuming we use a perfectly efficient hydrogen bomb that somehow converts all it's mass into energy using deuterium tritium fusion, we'd need approximately 10.000.000 tons of hydrogen. Half of that deuterium and half tritium. That sure is one Big nuke ;)
[deleted] t1_j8rwej9 wrote
[removed]
EarthSolar t1_j8rw19v wrote
Reply to comment by Pornelius_McSucc in Terraforming a magnetosphere possible? by Pornelius_McSucc
And why would you want to terraform those iceballs anyway? Just dig down and live in the ice shell or the subsurface oceans. Not much difference really.
kerfitten1234 t1_j8rvx4o wrote
Reply to comment by drgath in Terraforming a magnetosphere possible? by Pornelius_McSucc
Put a ring on it to shade the surface. A polar ring at about the right altitude might also give it a more earthlike day/night cycle.
I-tell-you-hwat t1_j8ruzzg wrote
Reply to comment by zolikk in Terraforming a magnetosphere possible? by Pornelius_McSucc
Argument for an artificial magnetosphere. Maintenance cost over the long run (hundreds-thousands of years) vs development of AM and less need for maintenance upkeep of the surface. Otherwise, if it’s not really needed then 🤷🏻♂️.
drgath t1_j8rurkx wrote
Reply to comment by kerfitten1234 in Terraforming a magnetosphere possible? by Pornelius_McSucc
Out of curiosity, what ways exist to cool down a planet like Venus, if you can’t just add lots of ice?
[deleted] t1_j8rudtk wrote
Reply to comment by EarthSolar in Terraforming a magnetosphere possible? by Pornelius_McSucc
[removed]
Pornelius_McSucc OP t1_j8ru4vo wrote
Reply to comment by EarthSolar in Terraforming a magnetosphere possible? by Pornelius_McSucc
Well wow. That's a big weight off, I suppose is one way to look at it lol. Possibly still a good idea for Jovian moons being baked by Jupiter's radiation? But then again, any settlement on a Jovian ice moon will be completely enclosed to begin with, as terraforming is an impractical impossibility I assume.
EarthSolar t1_j8rtex7 wrote
Reply to comment by zolikk in Terraforming a magnetosphere possible? by Pornelius_McSucc
I’d like to slip this link, which contains another link to an answer about why a magnetic field is not critically helpful in keeping an atmosphere intact.
EarthSolar t1_j8rsitb wrote
Reply to comment by Pornelius_McSucc in Terraforming a magnetosphere possible? by Pornelius_McSucc
I’m not sure how much thinner atmosphere would be required for radiation to be a big issue - I mean it doesn’t just instantly become an issue once it crosses a certain threshold - but I think it’s likely that any breathable mix is going to reduce the radiation to negligible levels.
[deleted] t1_j8rseh2 wrote
Shaneypants t1_j8rs18q wrote
Reply to comment by Paddy_Tanninger in The Nancy Grace Roman Space Telescope - the next major step in astronomy that will help unlock the secrets of the universe's expansion and dark energy. by upyoars
Tucker, we present to you the Tucker Carlson Center for Warm Weather Smarts and Stopping Yucky Germies.
Tucker, doing his little furrowed brow frowny face: "What is this? A center for ants?"
Pornelius_McSucc OP t1_j8rrzm3 wrote
Reply to comment by EarthSolar in Terraforming a magnetosphere possible? by Pornelius_McSucc
So there is really no benefit after all? Except maybe radiation in a less dense atmosphere like ours?
EarthSolar t1_j8rrerb wrote
Reply to comment by Pornelius_McSucc in Terraforming a magnetosphere possible? by Pornelius_McSucc
IIRC we had some really good answers from actual scientists about why magnetic field doesn’t do jack about the atmosphere, but idk why they’re not here. I’ll try to find it.
EarthSolar t1_j8rr6yk wrote
Reply to comment by dave200204 in Terraforming a magnetosphere possible? by Pornelius_McSucc
Mars has liquid core. This is known since 2003.
[deleted] t1_j8s2x3w wrote
Reply to comment by J3SS1KURR in NASA's "evolved structures" radically reduce weight – and waiting by Maxcactus
[removed]