Recent comments in /f/space
SenateLaunchScrubbed t1_j8y1cei wrote
Reply to comment by NeckingMyself in Do you think we will ever be able to start warping in space this century? by NeckingMyself
It absolutely is. Space is stupidly vast, and our fastest theoretical speed is stupidly slow. And even the energy requirements to get to an even reasonable percentage of the speed of light is stupidly high.
Still, we're still in diapers in terms of technology that isn't impossible. We still don't have a good way to explore our very own solar system, even our closest neighbor. We don't have the means to do long-term power in space, to build on other planets, etc.
I think the next century is going to be just that, spearheaded soon by Starship hopefully. Develop the tech to stay out there longer, further, reliably, sustainably. Only then, with some major improvements in propulsion tech, we might start looking at interstellar travel.
Emmend t1_j8y1aal wrote
Reply to comment by dittybopper_05H in Miranda was discovered 75 years ago by Tesla_Warlock
Well... apart from. The other 10%.
[deleted] t1_j8y0evo wrote
NeckingMyself OP t1_j8y01gk wrote
Reply to comment by SenateLaunchScrubbed in Do you think we will ever be able to start warping in space this century? by NeckingMyself
That is kind of depressing to hear
space-ModTeam t1_j8xzvuv wrote
Hello u/NeckingMyself, your submission "Do you think we will ever be able to start warping in space this century?" has been removed from r/space because:
- Such questions should be asked in the "All space questions" thread stickied at the top of the sub.
Please read the rules in the sidebar and check r/space for duplicate submissions before posting. If you have any questions about this removal please message the r/space moderators. Thank you.
SenateLaunchScrubbed t1_j8xzjxg wrote
I don't think "sooner or later" is a good understanding.
Everything we know points towards FTL being entirely impossible. Warp drives are math cheats, that don't really comply with our current understanding of physics.
They are, more likely than not, impossible, and will always be.
harrybarrydairy t1_j8xz5el wrote
We kinda need to figure out if it’s actually possible to do such a thing. Even if it is theoretically possible, I think we would need an amount of energy inaccessible to us right now with our technology.
[deleted] t1_j8xz3d0 wrote
[removed]
gerkletoss t1_j8xyygt wrote
Reply to comment by Tjam3s in Where does space really begin? Chinese spy balloon highlights legal fuzziness of ‘near space’ by HarpuasGhost
A good anount of RF traffic
gerkletoss t1_j8xytc9 wrote
Reply to comment by AlexHanson007 in Where does space really begin? Chinese spy balloon highlights legal fuzziness of ‘near space’ by HarpuasGhost
This is now a live-fire exercise the pilot doesn't need
[deleted] t1_j8xvrcu wrote
Reply to Miranda was discovered 75 years ago by Tesla_Warlock
[removed]
Lazerith22 t1_j8xvg6x wrote
Reply to Where does space really begin? Chinese spy balloon highlights legal fuzziness of ‘near space’ by HarpuasGhost
If there’s enough atmosphere to support a balloon, it’s not space yet.
HandsOfCobalt t1_j8xv4ih wrote
Reply to comment by TheGreatestOutdoorz in NEW JWST DEEP FIELD - Pandora's Cluster by GeoGeoGeoGeo
I think they were talking about the top and upper-right spikes being forked, not about the spikes being present.
Tjam3s t1_j8xugq7 wrote
Reply to comment by OudeStok in Where does space really begin? Chinese spy balloon highlights legal fuzziness of ‘near space’ by HarpuasGhost
What would that balloon have learned that wasn't already on Google earth and publicly available GPS data?
gumol t1_j8xru9z wrote
Reply to comment by AlexHanson007 in Where does space really begin? Chinese spy balloon highlights legal fuzziness of ‘near space’ by HarpuasGhost
they also buy replacements if they haven’t been used
missiles don’t last forever
US military buys 600 Sidewinders a year
AlexHanson007 t1_j8xroua wrote
Reply to comment by gumol in Where does space really begin? Chinese spy balloon highlights legal fuzziness of ‘near space’ by HarpuasGhost
You don't think they buy replacements once they've been used?
Edit: imagine being so upset by a basic question that you feel you have to downvote it. Some people are weird.
[deleted] t1_j8xrfzm wrote
Reply to comment by Coakis in Where does space really begin? Chinese spy balloon highlights legal fuzziness of ‘near space’ by HarpuasGhost
[removed]
[deleted] t1_j8xqplx wrote
dittybopper_05H t1_j8xqnvk wrote
Reply to comment by Destination_Centauri in Miranda was discovered 75 years ago by Tesla_Warlock
Everyone on Miranda is dead. It was the Pax. The G-23 Paxilon Hydrochlorate that they added to the air processors.
Coakis t1_j8xpg2w wrote
Reply to comment by BackItUpWithLinks in Where does space really begin? Chinese spy balloon highlights legal fuzziness of ‘near space’ by HarpuasGhost
Well your user name doesn't need to be redefined at least.
BackItUpWithLinks t1_j8xoor5 wrote
Reply to comment by Coakis in Where does space really begin? Chinese spy balloon highlights legal fuzziness of ‘near space’ by HarpuasGhost
Uhhh, well shit. I guess I need a new definition
https://www.smithsonianmag.com/air-space-magazine/first-space-ace-180968349/
[deleted] t1_j8xof3j wrote
Reply to Miranda was discovered 75 years ago by Tesla_Warlock
[removed]
Coakis t1_j8xo6gg wrote
Reply to comment by gumol in Where does space really begin? Chinese spy balloon highlights legal fuzziness of ‘near space’ by HarpuasGhost
The article is a bit of clickbait, It's not so much legal fuzziness as more there's no one agreed upon international defined limit, many countries use the Karmann line as the legal standard whereas the US defines it as 50 miles. So it is legally defined It just depends on where you're standing on the surface of the planet
Should we call the limit on the where international waters start "fuzzy" just because the Chinese use a greater distance from their shores than the US and other countries?
Same-Intern7716 t1_j8y2mh8 wrote
Reply to Chemists have discovered a new form of ice that more closely resembles liquid water than any other known ices, and they think it might be present on solar system moons likes Europa and Ganymede. by clayt6
don’t they think europa has an ocean under the surface ?