Recent comments in /f/space
danielravennest t1_j9c1w7w wrote
Reply to comment by djellison in This image of Mars shows the north polar ice cap, the border between highlands and lowlands, former river valleys, plains covered by dark sands and the large Hellas Planitia impact basin in the south. Credit: ESA/DLR/FU Berlin by MistWeaver80
Fortunately there are plenty of volatiles in the outer Solar System.
danielravennest t1_j9c1bpa wrote
Reply to comment by jdippey in This image of Mars shows the north polar ice cap, the border between highlands and lowlands, former river valleys, plains covered by dark sands and the large Hellas Planitia impact basin in the south. Credit: ESA/DLR/FU Berlin by MistWeaver80
The MAVEN spacecraft was sent to Mars to specifically measure the atmospheric loss rate. It is pretty low. The half-life of the Martian atmosphere is hundreds of millions of years. That's why it still has some atmosphere, and not vacuum.
danielravennest t1_j9bxvkd wrote
Reply to comment by escalibur in The Tadpole galaxy by Hubble, Its eye-catching tail is about 280,000 light-years long. Also known as UGC 10214 and Arp 188, it is a disrupted barred spiral galaxy located 420 million light-years from Earth in the northern constellation Draco. Credit Image: NASA/ESA/HST/STScI. by Davicho77
When light left this galaxy heading our way, the first land animals were just coming out of the oceans. Distance = Time.
[deleted] t1_j9bxroh wrote
Reply to comment by danielravennest in The Tadpole galaxy by Hubble, Its eye-catching tail is about 280,000 light-years long. Also known as UGC 10214 and Arp 188, it is a disrupted barred spiral galaxy located 420 million light-years from Earth in the northern constellation Draco. Credit Image: NASA/ESA/HST/STScI. by Davicho77
[removed]
danielravennest t1_j9bwdmq wrote
Reply to comment by SeriousPuppet in The Tadpole galaxy by Hubble, Its eye-catching tail is about 280,000 light-years long. Also known as UGC 10214 and Arp 188, it is a disrupted barred spiral galaxy located 420 million light-years from Earth in the northern constellation Draco. Credit Image: NASA/ESA/HST/STScI. by Davicho77
It is definitely from Hubble. It has two sets of detectors, UV to near Infrared, and near IR to mid IR. It has a total of 77 filters, including "no filter" option. Scientific cameras use filters to produce color images because you get 3 times as many pixels as common phone cameras, which have separate pixels for RGB colors.
So depending on filter choice for an image, it may not look like this if you saw it with your eyes directly. But it is still a real image produced by a camera and a telescope.
McTheoran t1_j9bu9um wrote
Reply to I spent 20 hours shooting the Horsehead nebula to create my most intricately detailed photo of this region. This area is surprisingly large, and if it were brighter it would appear much larger than the full moon. Make sure you zoom in! [OC] by ajamesmccarthy
I mean it's space, it can't be that surprisingly large compared to the rest of space hahahhah
Amazing shot
Stealing for background. Thanks!
UnifiedGods t1_j9bu1bq wrote
Reply to comment by imsahoamtiskaw in The Tadpole galaxy by Hubble, Its eye-catching tail is about 280,000 light-years long. Also known as UGC 10214 and Arp 188, it is a disrupted barred spiral galaxy located 420 million light-years from Earth in the northern constellation Draco. Credit Image: NASA/ESA/HST/STScI. by Davicho77
You both do not understand it.
TOGHeinz t1_j9bsvb7 wrote
Reply to comment by Barrrrrrnd in The Tadpole galaxy by Hubble, Its eye-catching tail is about 280,000 light-years long. Also known as UGC 10214 and Arp 188, it is a disrupted barred spiral galaxy located 420 million light-years from Earth in the northern constellation Draco. Credit Image: NASA/ESA/HST/STScI. by Davicho77
These kind of pictures always blow my mind. The main subject is absolutely fascinating. But just taking a gander beyond and seeing the sheer number of galaxies, realizing the distances and stars in each, understanding it’s only a tiny fraction of the sky and this is all around us in every direction.. it’s staggering.
Happy cake day.
[deleted] t1_j9bseia wrote
Reply to comment by Caffeine_and_Alcohol in The Tadpole galaxy by Hubble, Its eye-catching tail is about 280,000 light-years long. Also known as UGC 10214 and Arp 188, it is a disrupted barred spiral galaxy located 420 million light-years from Earth in the northern constellation Draco. Credit Image: NASA/ESA/HST/STScI. by Davicho77
[removed]
[deleted] t1_j9bqy8n wrote
Albertsongman t1_j9bqd6x wrote
Reply to I want to see the Andromeda Galaxy with my naked eye. I can't, I have a method of finding it using Cassiopeia and a field to walk out on to get away from the lights. by vnevner
You can see if by looking through your peripheral vision. If you look directly at it, it’s invisible to the naked eye.
vnevner OP t1_j9bphcs wrote
Reply to comment by jadnich in I want to see the Andromeda Galaxy with my naked eye. I can't, I have a method of finding it using Cassiopeia and a field to walk out on to get away from the lights. by vnevner
I heard that in fact, the cells for night vision is more in the perifiral, I will try that .
Adeldor t1_j9bp4f3 wrote
Reply to I want to see the Andromeda Galaxy with my naked eye. I can't, I have a method of finding it using Cassiopeia and a field to walk out on to get away from the lights. by vnevner
To the naked eye it'll appear as a faint smudge, best seen with averted vision. If there's any sky illumination by city lights visible, you'll have a very difficult time seeing it with just the eye, even if your locality is dark.
[deleted] t1_j9borbc wrote
Reply to comment by de_hell in The Tadpole galaxy by Hubble, Its eye-catching tail is about 280,000 light-years long. Also known as UGC 10214 and Arp 188, it is a disrupted barred spiral galaxy located 420 million light-years from Earth in the northern constellation Draco. Credit Image: NASA/ESA/HST/STScI. by Davicho77
[removed]
space-ModTeam t1_j9bo2xr wrote
Reply to Stars by Electronic_Tale_5756
Hello u/Electronic_Tale_5756, your submission "Stars" has been removed from r/space because:
- Such questions should be asked in the "All space questions" thread stickied at the top of the sub.
Please read the rules in the sidebar and check r/space for duplicate submissions before posting. If you have any questions about this removal please message the r/space moderators. Thank you.
Hopsblues t1_j9bnwdk wrote
Reply to comment by the_fungible_man in I want to see the Andromeda Galaxy with my naked eye. I can't, I have a method of finding it using Cassiopeia and a field to walk out on to get away from the lights. by vnevner
Well look for it as well then......
jadnich t1_j9bnms9 wrote
Reply to I want to see the Andromeda Galaxy with my naked eye. I can't, I have a method of finding it using Cassiopeia and a field to walk out on to get away from the lights. by vnevner
Andromeda, the Galaxy, is easiest to see if you aren’t looking directly at it. It kind of looks like a smudge on the sky. Cassiopeia points nearly right to it, which you said you know already.
I also think it helps to find the constellations Pegasus and Andromeda (the constellation). They are connected, with andromeda being the legs of Pegasus, and Pegasus being a large square in the sky.
When you have that, there is a bend in andromeda constellation that points to the galaxy. If you use both that and Cassiopeia, it is a bit easier.
I found that quality binoculars do a good job of seeing Andromeda. But no method of optics or referencing constellations will work if there is too much light pollution.
OverPower314 t1_j9bnfxo wrote
Reply to comment by ICLazeru in Stars by Electronic_Tale_5756
Yeah, that's pretty much what I was expecting.
ICLazeru t1_j9bn74y wrote
Reply to comment by OverPower314 in Stars by Electronic_Tale_5756
Visible stars are mostly bigger than the sun. Red dwarves tend to be too dim to see without equipment.
The1MrBP t1_j9bmsby wrote
Reply to Stars by Electronic_Tale_5756
Many light in sky.
Few planet like Venus, Jupiter. Most star.
Look at Sun, see Sun close. Look at star, no see far.
headRN t1_j9bmink wrote
Reply to Stars by Electronic_Tale_5756
Besides the sun, the next closest star is 4.24 light years or 25 trillion miles away. Nearly all of the points of light you see in the night sky will be stars. The conservative estimate is that there are 100 Billion stars in the Milky Way alone. Depending on the time of year and your location, you might be able to see a few planets from our solar system. Planets outside our solar system are to dim to see with the naked eye.
jadnich t1_j9bmga8 wrote
Reply to Stars by Electronic_Tale_5756
here is an image of a different star.
The problem is, they are so far away it is hard to get the resolution we can get with the sun.
Another interesting point is that the sun is not a particularly big star. It is average, if even on the smaller size. A star like Betelgeuse, the red star in the shoulder of the constellation Orion, is so big that if it sat where our sun is, the Earth would be inside of it.
Lord_Euni t1_j9bmdcu wrote
Reply to comment by Davicho77 in The Tadpole galaxy by Hubble, Its eye-catching tail is about 280,000 light-years long. Also known as UGC 10214 and Arp 188, it is a disrupted barred spiral galaxy located 420 million light-years from Earth in the northern constellation Draco. Credit Image: NASA/ESA/HST/STScI. by Davicho77
Which nearby galaxy though? Is it not on the picture of am I blind?
Smart_Supermarket_75 t1_j9bm5ws wrote
Reply to comment by Electronic_Tale_5756 in Stars by Electronic_Tale_5756
Your answer: the sun is up close. If the others were up close to us too. We’d never have had a chance to exist.
[deleted] t1_j9c2it5 wrote
Reply to I spent 20 hours shooting the Horsehead nebula to create my most intricately detailed photo of this region. This area is surprisingly large, and if it were brighter it would appear much larger than the full moon. Make sure you zoom in! [OC] by ajamesmccarthy
[removed]