Recent comments in /f/space

danielravennest t1_j9c1bpa wrote

The MAVEN spacecraft was sent to Mars to specifically measure the atmospheric loss rate. It is pretty low. The half-life of the Martian atmosphere is hundreds of millions of years. That's why it still has some atmosphere, and not vacuum.

1

danielravennest t1_j9bwdmq wrote

It is definitely from Hubble. It has two sets of detectors, UV to near Infrared, and near IR to mid IR. It has a total of 77 filters, including "no filter" option. Scientific cameras use filters to produce color images because you get 3 times as many pixels as common phone cameras, which have separate pixels for RGB colors.

So depending on filter choice for an image, it may not look like this if you saw it with your eyes directly. But it is still a real image produced by a camera and a telescope.

6

TOGHeinz t1_j9bsvb7 wrote

These kind of pictures always blow my mind. The main subject is absolutely fascinating. But just taking a gander beyond and seeing the sheer number of galaxies, realizing the distances and stars in each, understanding it’s only a tiny fraction of the sky and this is all around us in every direction.. it’s staggering.

Happy cake day.

2

space-ModTeam t1_j9bo2xr wrote

Hello u/Electronic_Tale_5756, your submission "Stars" has been removed from r/space because:

  • Such questions should be asked in the "All space questions" thread stickied at the top of the sub.

Please read the rules in the sidebar and check r/space for duplicate submissions before posting. If you have any questions about this removal please message the r/space moderators. Thank you.

1

jadnich t1_j9bnms9 wrote

Andromeda, the Galaxy, is easiest to see if you aren’t looking directly at it. It kind of looks like a smudge on the sky. Cassiopeia points nearly right to it, which you said you know already.

I also think it helps to find the constellations Pegasus and Andromeda (the constellation). They are connected, with andromeda being the legs of Pegasus, and Pegasus being a large square in the sky.

When you have that, there is a bend in andromeda constellation that points to the galaxy. If you use both that and Cassiopeia, it is a bit easier.

I found that quality binoculars do a good job of seeing Andromeda. But no method of optics or referencing constellations will work if there is too much light pollution.

25

The1MrBP t1_j9bmsby wrote

Many light in sky.
Few planet like Venus, Jupiter. Most star.
Look at Sun, see Sun close. Look at star, no see far.

1

headRN t1_j9bmink wrote

Besides the sun, the next closest star is 4.24 light years or 25 trillion miles away. Nearly all of the points of light you see in the night sky will be stars. The conservative estimate is that there are 100 Billion stars in the Milky Way alone. Depending on the time of year and your location, you might be able to see a few planets from our solar system. Planets outside our solar system are to dim to see with the naked eye.

2

jadnich t1_j9bmga8 wrote

here is an image of a different star.

The problem is, they are so far away it is hard to get the resolution we can get with the sun.

Another interesting point is that the sun is not a particularly big star. It is average, if even on the smaller size. A star like Betelgeuse, the red star in the shoulder of the constellation Orion, is so big that if it sat where our sun is, the Earth would be inside of it.

2