Recent comments in /f/space
Oberic t1_j9e7hvt wrote
Reply to comment by AbzoluteZ3RO in I can’t remember what it’s called by [deleted]
I haven't read as many books as I want to. I used to read more. But the focus to do that is no longer available to me.
Nah, I haven't.
I just like how Dragonball Z handles time travel.
AbzoluteZ3RO t1_j9e7hhl wrote
Reply to comment by internetboyfriend666 in I can’t remember what it’s called by [deleted]
it seems like lately every post i see from this sub is just some person asking a question based on total misunderstanding of some fundamental thing. same reason i unsubbed from eli5. and pretty much why i'm gonna unsub from this one right now. so long!
AbzoluteZ3RO t1_j9e7cff wrote
Reply to comment by Oberic in I can’t remember what it’s called by [deleted]
have you read the book 'pathfinder'? and it's sequels. it goes all crazy with this exact kind of scenario. it's by orson scott card. it does have the annoying parts of his writing style tho.
Illusion_Jolted t1_j9e5xiy wrote
Reply to comment by SomethingIrreverent in I want to see the Andromeda Galaxy with my naked eye. I can't, I have a method of finding it using Cassiopeia and a field to walk out on to get away from the lights. by vnevner
Hi! Could you please tell me where are you situated? I love star gazing and have taken few trips to dark sky parks. Honestly the only place wheres I found like complete darkness were creator lake NP in Oregon and big bend NP Texas. Most hyped in my opinion was Death Valley NP, it had so much light pollution from Los Vegas and Los Angles skylights. No matter where I went, there would be no complete darkness. People take photo and edit them to make them appear all beautiful but in reality the place would be sh!t lit from light pollution from nearby cities.
d33pcode t1_j9e3cmj wrote
Reply to Lance Bass was kicked off a Russian spaceflight two decades ago—now he’s back by hemlockfuture
He looks good for someone who floated alone in space for 20 years.
[deleted] t1_j9e2upk wrote
internetboyfriend666 t1_j9e1tu7 wrote
Reply to I can’t remember what it’s called by [deleted]
What you're saying doesn't make much sense but it sounds like you're very trying to describe the Novikov self-consistency principle. To be clear, this is a conjecture with no scientific basis. Time travel to the past is theoretically not impossible in certain spacetime geometries but that doesn't mean it actually is possible, and even if it is, we certainly don't know how to do it, so we have no way of saying how something that might not even be possible might potentially work if it were possible.
Oberic t1_j9e1m28 wrote
Reply to I can’t remember what it’s called by [deleted]
I like the version where instead of altering the future when you go to the past and alter things, you snap off an entirely new independent timeline. AKA Nothing you do will affect the timeline you came from when you hit the "Return to Point of Origin" button. AKA Dragonball Z time travel.
You can totally go one day backwards and kill the past day version of your own self and you will continue living because you clearly did not die in your timeline, yet. Then you could go another day further back and grab you from the past and bring yourself to the future. Multiple you would be fine because, although you were never recruited by yourself, you gained the ability to recruit yourself later.
Splitting timelines might make some of them collapse, dunno if it's possible in the first place, but I like this version for storytelling.
You can have your cake AND eat it. But you can never change mistakes from your own time, you have to live in an always-moving-forward way.
Space_Walrus_ t1_j9e0lui wrote
Reply to comment by Far-Counter-1319 in I can’t remember what it’s called by [deleted]
I read the study. It's from the same uni I did my Masters in Astrophysics at.
It was a purely mathematical hypothesis paper.
There is no evidence of close time curves being any more real than multiversal theory. The publication is a mathematical approach to if Einstein-Rosen Bridges actually exist within the physical world.
If a CTC is physically proven to exist, then yes, this study has some merit. But as far as current human knowledge goes, this is on the same wavelength as string theory, multiverse theory, or the death of the universe.
Far-Counter-1319 t1_j9e01vf wrote
Reply to comment by Space_Walrus_ in I can’t remember what it’s called by [deleted]
At the end it says “A recent study at the University of Queensland may have the answer to this baffling paradox. In this study, the researchers prove mathematically that paradox-free time travel is possible, showing that the universe will self-correct to avoid inconsistencies.”
[deleted] OP t1_j9dz1sd wrote
Reply to I can’t remember what it’s called by [deleted]
[removed]
KindAwareness3073 t1_j9dywbi wrote
Reply to comment by vnevner in I want to see the Andromeda Galaxy with my naked eye. I can't, I have a method of finding it using Cassiopeia and a field to walk out on to get away from the lights. by vnevner
Three keys to seeing Andromeda: clear dark sky; giving your eyes at least 15 minutes in darkness to develop your "night vision"; and using "averted vision", i.e., not looking directly at it. If done correctly it's surprisingly obvious.
[deleted] OP t1_j9dypgm wrote
Reply to I can’t remember what it’s called by [deleted]
[removed]
Space_Walrus_ t1_j9dyk0a wrote
Reply to I can’t remember what it’s called by [deleted]
You aren't making a lot of sense with your question but the link you posted above refers simply to special relativity
But you'll want into what we astrophysicists call "light cones" or "null cones". This will help point you in the direction that UQ student went with his study on chaos-free time travel. This study also assumes closed time curves, which is still just a hypothesis at this point
Itis_TheStranger t1_j9dxsqg wrote
Reply to comment by araujoms in Painting the Pillars of Creation...again! by Quarkycharmedart
That doesn't make sense. Why would he just use the photo? Are you ok?
Far-Counter-1319 t1_j9dwwcg wrote
Reply to comment by SaxyOmega90125 in I can’t remember what it’s called by [deleted]
This isn’t exactly what I was looking for but it references what I’m talking about
https://blog.scienceborealis.ca/time-travel-is-possible-but-its-a-one-way-ticket/
[deleted] t1_j9dwuy8 wrote
Reply to comment by spearmint_wino in All of Jupiter's Large Moons Have Auroras by DevilsRefugee
[removed]
SaxyOmega90125 t1_j9dwc7m wrote
Reply to I can’t remember what it’s called by [deleted]
I believe the phrase you're looking for is 'wishful thinking'.
[deleted] t1_j9dvpf1 wrote
marimbawarrior t1_j9dtbw4 wrote
Reply to comment by mmgoodly in ‘We found the Artemis-I noise level at 5 km had a crackling quality about 40 million times greater than a bowl of Rice Krispies.’ — Maximum noise measured during Artemis-I launch on 16 Nov. 2022 was higher than predicted by marketrent
True! Inverse square law can help us out here.
Just punched the numbers in, 26 dB louder if you were located 80 meters away from the rocket, or roughly 162 dB. So yeah, 136 dB from 1.6 km would make total sense.
[deleted] t1_j9dskmw wrote
Reply to comment by BackwoodsRoller in space is crazy by AggravatingBase1896
thanks man, and yes you are ☺️. we are eternal.
BackwoodsRoller t1_j9dsad7 wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in space is crazy by AggravatingBase1896
I feel the same way but could never express it so eloquently. I am God.
[deleted] t1_j9dqhjy wrote
Reply to space is crazy by AggravatingBase1896
Space is everything. Space is our home. Our universe is our home. Our universe made us and is us. Our consciousness is a gift, it’s a byproduct of the universe. Its the universe awakening through itself. And if you think you’re smart, then how smart is the universe that made you? I would guess infinitely smarter. I believe there exists an intelligence that’s beyond our capabilities of understanding. An intelligence that can’t be put into words because we are only human. But i believe in its own way, space is alive. Space is the God. And yet we worry about trivial mundane things in our everyday lives all the while we exist in a seemingly infinite space. Its amazing. But never forget, we are one with it, and when we die, I believe we return back into it and become truly one with it again. We are space and we are all one.
meegja t1_j9e8693 wrote
Reply to comment by AbzoluteZ3RO in I can’t remember what it’s called by [deleted]
You do realize that asking questions is the only way to correct those total misunderstandings? ;)