Recent comments in /f/space
[deleted] t1_j9kmups wrote
random_shitter t1_j9kmmt5 wrote
Reply to comment by verifiedboomer in what's the future of space travel within the next 27 years in 2050 to 2100 by LatterCardiologist47
Ithink you sincerely underestimate how much money can be made in space. We're just cracking the tools and 1st benefits of micro-g production and biosciences. There needs to be only 1 succesful product that has to be produced in space to let asteroid mining companies have business plans viable for venture capital. As soon as there is some asteroid mining the cat's out of the bag and things will explode.
[deleted] t1_j9kmm2u wrote
[deleted] t1_j9kmlzd wrote
Reply to comment by verifiedboomer in what's the future of space travel within the next 27 years in 2050 to 2100 by LatterCardiologist47
[removed]
[deleted] t1_j9km3mv wrote
[removed]
Enterovirus71 t1_j9klzn7 wrote
Reply to comment by wwarnout in Researchers discover mysterious source of 'heartbeat-like' radio bursts in a solar fare by AbbydonX
It really doesn't, though. "Heartbeat-like" is used to describe a plehtora of vibrational patterns that have the iconic "heartbeat" pattern.
[deleted] t1_j9kkzkb wrote
[removed]
Topsyye t1_j9kkl25 wrote
Reply to comment by LatterCardiologist47 in what's the future of space travel within the next 27 years in 2050 to 2100 by LatterCardiologist47
If I can predict anything it’s that if the “dear moon” mission is a success and highly publicized, that will set many things off for the world for space flight.
The_Bald t1_j9kjuh9 wrote
Reply to comment by tuokcalbmai in What are in your opinion the scariest objects / occurrences in our universe? by SpaceCinema_
>I'm not sure if this absurd thing I came up with is actually what you meant, but just in case it is, here is what I would say about it if I was right.
That aside, no, not at all. Fear is, as you say, very natural. Intentionally looking into topics you know will upset you is not. That's why I referenced doom-scrolling with 'doomer energy'. They start off their comment lamenting about how afraid of this thing they are, then come back and say "bad news everyone, it's actually really bad. This thing that might happen would ruin our lives, destroy society, and it could happen!". That's not just fear. If we're in the sport of irrationally reading into things -- I'd call that fear-mongering.
Me cautioning them against seeking out information that will upset them is not gatekeeping, it is very much me looking out for someone who does not seem to be doing too well. It is what we all have to do in the information age and the subset of social media.
[deleted] t1_j9kjb84 wrote
[removed]
MajorDakka t1_j9kj88j wrote
Reply to comment by Omegaprimus in DARPA is Reigniting the Nuclear Engine by Afrin_Drip
Sort of? The article doesn't state whether it's going to be open cycle or closed cycle.
But I'm assuming it's going to be a closed cycle solid core nuclear thermal rocket so presumably, no irradiation plume in the exhaust.
PandaEven3982 t1_j9kihq6 wrote
Reply to what's the future of space travel within the next 27 years in 2050 to 2100 by LatterCardiologist47
In my personal opinion, we won't be able to get off this planet in any significant way, until humanity develops a social structure different and a bit more politically advanced. We just don't have the culture yet to support more than small projects, and the big projects won't get off the ground until the species decides to stop fighting so much.
ATM, I see nothing more than small stuff in the inner planets. Mostly military buildup over Terra and lots of science. Maybe a billionaire hotel somewhere pretty.
verifiedboomer t1_j9ki0ot wrote
Reply to what's the future of space travel within the next 27 years in 2050 to 2100 by LatterCardiologist47
There is no reason for colonizing the moon or Mars or even low Earth orbit that will ever come close to justifying the expense or hazards. Just because these things are so convincingly depicted in science fiction films or games doesn't make them any easier to do.
Political will may exist long enough to boots on the moon again, but it won't last long.
kalenxy t1_j9khl6c wrote
Reply to comment by wwarnout in Researchers discover mysterious source of 'heartbeat-like' radio bursts in a solar fare by AbbydonX
I've used "heartbeat" to describe a signal before that wasn't intended to mean sentient. Many of these space articles do publish very dramatic titles either way.
studiocrash t1_j9khix5 wrote
Reply to comment by Chimpgainz in What are in your opinion the scariest objects / occurrences in our universe? by SpaceCinema_
That’s a lot of “maybe”’s and what if’s. I suggest reading up on the subject of black holes. There are a lot of answers to your questions already out there in scientific literature, including stuff written for non-scientists. For some short, we’ll explained videos I recommend checking out h this YouTube channel: https://youtube.com/@pbsspacetime.
keener91 t1_j9khd0u wrote
Reply to Researchers discover mysterious source of 'heartbeat-like' radio bursts in a solar fare by AbbydonX
I too don't like the clickbait nature of the title. But then again, back in 70's the discovery of pulsar was initially coined as Little Green Men. So dumbing down and stoking interest for the masses do help research as they provide more visibility and funding.
Let's see where this leads.
stewake t1_j9kgud9 wrote
Reply to comment by driftefx in Researchers discover mysterious source of 'heartbeat-like' radio bursts in a solar fare by AbbydonX
Let’s push Bikini Bottom somewhere else!
HeyImGilly t1_j9kgh57 wrote
Hope that $20/kg becomes a reality in my lifetime.
Tycho81 t1_j9kg52i wrote
Reply to what's the future of space travel within the next 27 years in 2050 to 2100 by LatterCardiologist47
Next 25 years we just begin with colonizing, then new doors will go open, also discussie points
For example, will mars go industrial path or science with life searching path? If mars want to be independent and create own economy, they will be very poor on paper but can be very rich because asteroids belt is near mars, for selling rare metals to the earth.
[deleted] t1_j9kfri3 wrote
Reply to comment by Omegaprimus in DARPA is Reigniting the Nuclear Engine by Afrin_Drip
[removed]
LatterCardiologist47 OP t1_j9kfq2n wrote
Reply to comment by Topsyye in what's the future of space travel within the next 27 years in 2050 to 2100 by LatterCardiologist47
Well let's hope it does
[deleted] t1_j9kerm0 wrote
Reply to comment by ItsScaryTerryBitch in What are in your opinion the scariest objects / occurrences in our universe? by SpaceCinema_
So good to see you I missed you so much
[deleted] t1_j9ked4u wrote
Reply to comment by tuokcalbmai in What are in your opinion the scariest objects / occurrences in our universe? by SpaceCinema_
ZzzzzzzzzzzzzZzzzzzzzzzz
Zip Zzzzp
Zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
Zip zip zip zip zip
Topsyye t1_j9ked3s wrote
Reply to what's the future of space travel within the next 27 years in 2050 to 2100 by LatterCardiologist47
In my opinion you can’t predict anything like this until a vehicle like starship or similar has been tested and proven for human&cargo flight.
If a vehicle like that doesn’t work, I don’t have much hope for what you mentioned tbh.
[deleted] t1_j9kndxs wrote
Reply to what's the future of space travel within the next 27 years in 2050 to 2100 by LatterCardiologist47
[removed]