Recent comments in /f/space
nw342 t1_j9kw4oo wrote
Reply to comment by 19dm19 in what's the future of space travel within the next 27 years in 2050 to 2100 by LatterCardiologist47
its not impossible, just not enough money is being spent of research. We could have a manned mars mission in 5 years with enough money
KeaboUltra t1_j9kw1h8 wrote
Reply to comment by PandaEven3982 in what's the future of space travel within the next 27 years in 2050 to 2100 by LatterCardiologist47
I disagree, I dont think a "social structure different and a bit more politically advanced" will happen unless we find ourselves in space first, and develop calendars, time, and laws that work for an environment that doesn't utilize these things. This may come about in a lunar colony, the likes of what we're seeing with the moonbase space race with artemis. we may not see anything immediate but I think this is the recipe. I think going to the moon, for residency and work with regular trips to Mars the way we treated the moon would be significant enough for the next century to begin making their way to other planets.
Crazed_Archivist t1_j9kvvyd wrote
Reply to comment by PandaEven3982 in what's the future of space travel within the next 27 years in 2050 to 2100 by LatterCardiologist47
You think that the western world, you know, the ones leading the space race Departament, didn't evolve socially that much in comparison to when... check notes... we had the inquisition; absolute monarchy; no worker laws; no freedom of speech; no human rights; the entire industry of human slavery; propertied woman; etc etc etc
SaintVeloth420 t1_j9kvmhq wrote
Reply to comment by Mitthrawnuruo in DARPA is Reigniting the Nuclear Engine by Afrin_Drip
India’s space program is pretty amazing, comparing them to Blue Origin is an insult
PandaEven3982 t1_j9kvfub wrote
Reply to comment by Crazed_Archivist in what's the future of space travel within the next 27 years in 2050 to 2100 by LatterCardiologist47
Technology development yes. Social development? Take a good hard look around. I have faith in the tech and the science. I have no faith in the human component. We haven't kept pace with our technical development.
EDIT
Just consider. There are about 2500 billionaires in the world. About 1 million millionaires. And then there 9 billion of the rest of us. Does this seem sensible to you from the macro perspective? Is this a sensible allocation of human wealth?
onioning t1_j9kv7ny wrote
Reply to what's the future of space travel within the next 27 years in 2050 to 2100 by LatterCardiologist47
It's not the flashy things people want, but drones and robots. There is so very much more we can do. What we've done on Mars is amazing. Do more of that.
I know people want manned travel but that is not only impractical, it may always be impractical.
[deleted] t1_j9kuyom wrote
Reply to comment by Mitthrawnuruo in DARPA is Reigniting the Nuclear Engine by Afrin_Drip
[removed]
PandaEven3982 t1_j9ksy7v wrote
Reply to comment by Crazed_Archivist in what's the future of space travel within the next 27 years in 2050 to 2100 by LatterCardiologist47
They colonized by using disease and war. You think war in the most inimical environment around is gonna be cheap?
Crazed_Archivist t1_j9ksv4g wrote
Reply to comment by tom_tencats in what's the future of space travel within the next 27 years in 2050 to 2100 by LatterCardiologist47
There's also 500 years of development between us and the Europeans that got to America
Have faith in humanity
Mitthrawnuruo t1_j9ksfib wrote
Reply to comment by MrBlockhead in DARPA is Reigniting the Nuclear Engine by Afrin_Drip
By tinfoil hat you mean the most likely reason.
Considering their record is worse then India’s space program at this point.
jinqsi t1_j9krob2 wrote
Reply to comment by Orpa__ in what's the future of space travel within the next 27 years in 2050 to 2100 by LatterCardiologist47
Manufacturing in orbit may be a better place to start. Microgravity is a big deal for 3D printing. Basically if the only place you can make something is in friggin space, the value of that thing will be huge.
tom_tencats t1_j9kr44u wrote
Reply to comment by Crazed_Archivist in what's the future of space travel within the next 27 years in 2050 to 2100 by LatterCardiologist47
There is tremendous difference between colonizing another terrestrial continent and colonizing space.
TheawesomeQ t1_j9kr0nq wrote
Reply to comment by Topsyye in Starship greenlit for launch after static fire test by DevilsRefugee
I thought they'd do this launch a year ago
UmpShow t1_j9kqtef wrote
Reply to what's the future of space travel within the next 27 years in 2050 to 2100 by LatterCardiologist47
It all depends on cost. If Starship works as expected (or something like it), you will see activity in space explode. It is the 21st century version of the transcontinental railroad.
[deleted] t1_j9kqgj3 wrote
[deleted] t1_j9kpsxn wrote
Reply to comment by UniversalDH in Researchers discover mysterious source of 'heartbeat-like' radio bursts in a solar fare by AbbydonX
[deleted]
Verksin t1_j9kpsue wrote
Reply to comment by Andromeda321 in What are in your opinion the scariest objects / occurrences in our universe? by SpaceCinema_
i love it i love how outlandish this is
its not boring
19dm19 t1_j9kpsmf wrote
Reply to what's the future of space travel within the next 27 years in 2050 to 2100 by LatterCardiologist47
Goal for 2200 is to have all factory production robotized and on moon and mars
2050 is too close, maximum what could happen - mission to moon.
Mars manned mission is impossible untill 2100 because of no science on human protection against radiation in far space orbits
Quwinsoft t1_j9koxwn wrote
Reply to what's the future of space travel within the next 27 years in 2050 to 2100 by LatterCardiologist47
I don't see a business case for Moon or Mars colonies.
Astroid mining only makes sense if you are supporting some other off-Earth business.
Telecom will likely swarm LOE, but venture capital is likely going to be tight for then next 20 years + with the retirement of the Babey Boomers so that is hard to say.
If micro-G industry or orbital power ever become viable then things will change but that is a big if.
Crazed_Archivist t1_j9kopv1 wrote
Reply to comment by TheViceroy919 in what's the future of space travel within the next 27 years in 2050 to 2100 by LatterCardiologist47
Completely disagree.
Europeans had waaaaay more backwards societal structures and tech. Didn't stop them from colonizing the Americas.
Starsimy t1_j9kod58 wrote
Reply to comment by Vulcan_MasterRace in DARPA is Reigniting the Nuclear Engine by Afrin_Drip
For reaching alpha centauri in 15.000 years instead of 18.000?
TheViceroy919 t1_j9koa33 wrote
Reply to comment by PandaEven3982 in what's the future of space travel within the next 27 years in 2050 to 2100 by LatterCardiologist47
This is absolutely my opinion as well. Truly taking the next step is being held back more by our society than our science.
Orpa__ t1_j9knpmj wrote
Reply to what's the future of space travel within the next 27 years in 2050 to 2100 by LatterCardiologist47
I think a permanent presence around the Moon is a good place to start.
Quwinsoft t1_j9kniey wrote
Reply to comment by random_shitter in what's the future of space travel within the next 27 years in 2050 to 2100 by LatterCardiologist47
With the Baby Boomers retiring and deglobalization, venture capital is already starting to dry up.
[deleted] t1_j9kwvvy wrote
Reply to NASA confirms 1,000lb meteorite slammed into Texas | As good time as any for European Space Agency to announce a 2030 asteoroid-spotting mission by chrisdh79
[removed]