Recent comments in /f/space

internetboyfriend666 t1_j9n63y1 wrote

That's not a theory, that's a baseless claim that flies in the face of all known facts and basic logic. I have a "theory" that there's a teapot orbiting the sun somewhere out by Mars but it's too small to be seen with any telescope. How about you disprove that?

7

Makaneek t1_j9n5upq wrote

Holding bible history as true still would give us no reason to think the universe is so young. We tend to focus so much on the physical and material process of creation with that we don’t tend to consider whether the Israelites would have cared about that much, and really why the revelation given to them should be expected to address it. Some clues in the text like the word “bara” connoting the bringing of order and function (as in “create in me a clean heart”) and the purpose of the sun and moon (signs and seasons) being prioritized over their names implies the text of Genesis 1 isn’t the construction of a building, but the furnishing of a home or temple, where God can commune with His human creation. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R24WZ4Hvytc

2

hatersaurusrex t1_j9n5pe4 wrote

You're looking for scientific evidence to reconcile religious belief.

You might as well be asking if there's climate data which shows global warming might actually be caused by Apollo flying his chariot to close too the Earth.

17

doodcool612 t1_j9n5nr0 wrote

The whole idea of a “physical explanation” dissolves when we add in a supernatural element. For example, imagine God says, “The speed of light is temporarily no longer the fundamental speed limit of the Universe” and then speedy zoomies the stars far far away in just 6000 years. Is that a “physical explanation?” Yes, in that the physical bodies followed all the rules that existed. You could “explain away” literally anything.

10

DrMilzie OP t1_j9n5f49 wrote

I actually really appreciate this response. Yes, I am a believer, but I struggle with believing a 6,000 year old universe and I've just struggled with this question. Einstein showed us time is relative, and according to the genesis account of creation, earth wasn't even created until day 4. A day is a rotation of the earth, so what was days 1-3? How were they measured? For a 5th dimensional (or higher being) those 3 days could have been billions of years relative to us 4 dimensional beings

1

babyyodaisamazing98 t1_j9n5cj1 wrote

People seem very irrationally angry at your question.

The answer however is no it wouldn’t explain it away. Dark matter is used to explain why galaxy rotation doesn’t match expectation. It doesn’t matter how long ago the galaxy started rotating, dark matter is still needed to explain the rotation we do see.

In a similar vein the universe accelerating is explained by dark energy, which also doesn’t care about the age of the universe. The fact that it accelerating at all is where the explanation for dark energy comes in.

4