Recent comments in /f/space
JeffFromSchool t1_j9p6xfc wrote
Reply to comment by cshotton in Starship greenlit for launch after static fire test by DevilsRefugee
The only thing I'm certain of is that you can't be certain of the costs enough to be comparative.
With so many unknowns, how on earth can you say "damn, starship is cost competitive with space elevators"?
LukeNukeEm243 t1_j9p61aw wrote
Reply to comment by wedontlikespaces in NASA confirms 1,000lb meteorite slammed into Texas | As good time as any for European Space Agency to announce a 2030 asteoroid-spotting mission by chrisdh79
There was at least one piece of the meteor that reached the ground and was found near El Sauz Texas
Deathbyhours t1_j9p5s9q wrote
Reply to comment by mateogg in Starship greenlit for launch after static fire test by DevilsRefugee
So you think Musk should have made up a word for it, like creativity-challenged automakers do?
It’s a marketing name. He is, much more than anything else, a salesman. He could have called it the Star Sphere, I suppose. Of course, that is also already a thing. Wombat? No, also already a thing.
You must find military aircraft names very frustrating.
mateogg t1_j9p4pk6 wrote
Reply to comment by Deathbyhours in Starship greenlit for launch after static fire test by DevilsRefugee
And this is exactly why I think it's a stupid name. The word already existed, and it had a definition, and this does not fit it. It's kind of like designing a new airplane and calling it Flying Car.
wedontlikespaces t1_j9p3p71 wrote
Reply to comment by KAKrisko in NASA confirms 1,000lb meteorite slammed into Texas | As good time as any for European Space Agency to announce a 2030 asteoroid-spotting mission by chrisdh79
Are yes, the American medium corgi
wedontlikespaces t1_j9p3gy8 wrote
Reply to comment by LukeNukeEm243 in NASA confirms 1,000lb meteorite slammed into Texas | As good time as any for European Space Agency to announce a 2030 asteoroid-spotting mission by chrisdh79
So it didn't in fact, in anynway, hit Texas. Which I suppose explains the complete lack of a giant crater which I found suspicious.
There is bad science reporting and then there is straight up lying.
imafraidofmuricans t1_j9p1lp6 wrote
Reply to comment by digitalbilly in NASA confirms 1,000lb meteorite slammed into Texas | As good time as any for European Space Agency to announce a 2030 asteoroid-spotting mission by chrisdh79
Anyone located on the rock
[deleted] t1_j9p1dxr wrote
[removed]
WannaGetHighh t1_j9p0zzt wrote
Reply to comment by wedontlikespaces in NASA confirms 1,000lb meteorite slammed into Texas | As good time as any for European Space Agency to announce a 2030 asteoroid-spotting mission by chrisdh79
The meteor weighed about half a giraffe
MugillacuttyHOF37 t1_j9p0zqd wrote
Reply to comment by TonyDungyHatesOP in NASA confirms 1,000lb meteorite slammed into Texas | As good time as any for European Space Agency to announce a 2030 asteoroid-spotting mission by chrisdh79
They sell those at the Piggly Wiggly and they're call Baby Bacon Squeezes.
Just $12.99 for a 4 pack.
cshotton t1_j9ozeoc wrote
Reply to comment by JeffFromSchool in Starship greenlit for launch after static fire test by DevilsRefugee
With so many unknowns, you seem quite certain in your criticism.
apple-pie2020 t1_j9owp0d wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in Time dilation question by [deleted]
Ok. It’s probably me. It’s been a good five years since I saw it. I’ll rewatch it, it was entertaining
wedontlikespaces t1_j9ow8r5 wrote
Reply to comment by TbonerT in NASA confirms 1,000lb meteorite slammed into Texas | As good time as any for European Space Agency to announce a 2030 asteoroid-spotting mission by chrisdh79
Perhaps they are special low-density baby elephant?
[deleted] t1_j9ow2xe wrote
wedontlikespaces t1_j9ow2rw wrote
Reply to comment by jered6323 in NASA confirms 1,000lb meteorite slammed into Texas | As good time as any for European Space Agency to announce a 2030 asteoroid-spotting mission by chrisdh79
I'm sorry but I need my measurements represented as percentages of a giraffe.
DrunkensteinsMonster t1_j9ot3wy wrote
Reply to comment by robertojh_200 in Starship greenlit for launch after static fire test by DevilsRefugee
No. It is detached. Look at the sum of work over the last two years, most of it was always planned. He was saying they were a couple months away when they had scarcely fired any engines on super heavy. He claimed they were a couple months away before they even stacked it, which they had to do with a crane, because the launch tower wasn’t even done yet. That’s coming up on two years ago.
JeffFromSchool t1_j9osfb2 wrote
Reply to comment by robertojh_200 in Starship greenlit for launch after static fire test by DevilsRefugee
The physics doesn't have anything to do with finances. Until some actual engineering is done, there is no projected cost for this. There is no prototype design, or even a realistic concept design.
You don't know how often parts are going to need to be replaced, or how much it will cost to build initially, you don't even know what parts are going into it!
[deleted] t1_j9os6d0 wrote
Reply to comment by robertojh_200 in Starship greenlit for launch after static fire test by DevilsRefugee
[deleted]
robertojh_200 t1_j9orw1n wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in Starship greenlit for launch after static fire test by DevilsRefugee
That’s not detached. That’s the reality of rocket science. Delays are baked into the DNA of the process. At the very moment that he made his comments, they probably were a few months away, but then something broke, or the numbers stopped adding up, or something exploded. SpaceX is still the fastest moving launch company in the world even with the delays.
robertojh_200 t1_j9ormwi wrote
Reply to comment by JeffFromSchool in Starship greenlit for launch after static fire test by DevilsRefugee
Because we know the physics of how an elevator will work and what sort of mass they could carry for how much energy. The actual development is the far future part but there’s been plenty of research.
Niwi_ t1_j9or9rh wrote
Reply to comment by JeffFromSchool in Starship greenlit for launch after static fire test by DevilsRefugee
Considering the arms lobby my money is on the X-Wing
Niwi_ t1_j9or1d7 wrote
Reply to comment by Harisdrop in Starship greenlit for launch after static fire test by DevilsRefugee
Thats about $0.02 a gram wow
[deleted] t1_j9opnj0 wrote
Reply to comment by TheawesomeQ in Starship greenlit for launch after static fire test by DevilsRefugee
[deleted]
NoFittingName t1_j9p701s wrote
Reply to comment by cshotton in Starship greenlit for launch after static fire test by DevilsRefugee
Their criticism is exactly that: there are so many unknowns that a comparison is useless.