Recent comments in /f/space
SnakesInYerPants t1_j9w4lxi wrote
Reply to comment by gumol in why should the heigh of astronaut matter 🤔 by Ok-Medium-1853
On earth, if the driver of your self driving bus gets too sick to operate the vehicle or gets hurt in an accident or dies, there are 100s if not 1000s of people who can readily replace them.
On Dragon, if something happens to 1 or both of the designated pilots, there are only 5 people who could replace them.
TransManNY t1_j9w4860 wrote
Space X Crew 7, scheduled for August 2023. The commander for the flight is Jasmine Moghbeli, it's her first flight. She will also be the first Irani-American in space.
Jakebsorensen t1_j9w474q wrote
Reply to comment by shotsallover in why should the heigh of astronaut matter 🤔 by Ok-Medium-1853
It’s about 6’2” for pilots and about 6’4” for mission specialists now
gumol t1_j9w3xnz wrote
Reply to comment by SnakesInYerPants in why should the heigh of astronaut matter 🤔 by Ok-Medium-1853
> You know how you still need a licence and to be physically capable of driving when in a self driving vehicle because they can still fail and need you to step in?
every single person onboard of a self driving car has to have a driving license? That's not even true for regular, non self driving cars.
Space Shuttle only had 2 seats for pilots. Rest of the crew were passengers.
Dragon will be able to carry up to 7 people to orbit. They can't all be flying the spacecraft.
patco81 t1_j9w3430 wrote
Every day of my life, I learn something new, that makes me realize how little I actually know.
Nowledge!
You can't have too much.
Glad I spent all of those years in high school.
[deleted] t1_j9w30js wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in why should the heigh of astronaut matter 🤔 by Ok-Medium-1853
[removed]
Ok-Medium-1853 OP t1_j9w2py1 wrote
Reply to comment by Medium-Veterinarian3 in why should the heigh of astronaut matter 🤔 by Ok-Medium-1853
R u sure? I read at least 157cm in Google🙄🤨
[deleted] t1_j9w2g0z wrote
[removed]
SloppityNurglePox t1_j9w27e6 wrote
Reply to comment by SteveMcQwark in Massive 'forbidden planet' orbits a strangely tiny star only 4 times its size. by Rifletree
All things are possible through the Immaterium.
[deleted] t1_j9w250s wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_j9w23dg wrote
Reply to Massive 'forbidden planet' orbits a strangely tiny star only 4 times its size. by Rifletree
[removed]
zephyer19 OP t1_j9w230y wrote
Reply to comment by demanbmore in Could they move ice from the planets to Earth? by zephyer19
Can't put in too much salt, can't put in too much plastic, can't put in too many chemicals...
Is the ocean just one big sewer?
Anyway, thanks for answering the question with science.
Ok-Medium-1853 OP t1_j9w22r3 wrote
Reply to comment by theronimous in why should the heigh of astronaut matter 🤔 by Ok-Medium-1853
Yes you are right to some extent I am 153cm and always dreamed of being an astronaut. This year I want to choose engineering science but I don't know if I should follow my interests or not🥴🤦🏻♀️
ShuRugal t1_j9w1xtu wrote
Reply to comment by Junkererer in Massive 'forbidden planet' orbits a strangely tiny star only 4 times its size. by Rifletree
That only means that it requires permits many.
[deleted] t1_j9w0umu wrote
Reply to Massive 'forbidden planet' orbits a strangely tiny star only 4 times its size. by Rifletree
[removed]
SnakesInYerPants t1_j9w0qd7 wrote
Reply to comment by gumol in why should the heigh of astronaut matter 🤔 by Ok-Medium-1853
You know how you still need a licence and to be physically capable of driving when in a self driving vehicle because they can still fail and need you to step in? Same thing here. Except on earth if your self driving car loses control and needs you to step in but you’re unresponsive, most are designed to start slowing down and pulling to the side/parking and if they don’t pull over successfully you’ll still most likely live any accident you get into while it’s slowing down. In space, even a minute of you being unresponsive can result in you getting pulled too far into an orbit where you’ll then either crash into the celestial body or get sling-shot off into deep space. The fuel margins are also so tight that you really don’t have any extra to burn correcting coarse even if you’re not pulled into an orbit.
Astronauts have strict requirements for very good reasons. It’s one of the most dangerous jobs you could get into, right next to being in the emergency response crew for nuclear reactors.
urmomaisjabbathehutt t1_j9w0jx7 wrote
Reply to comment by SteveMcQwark in Massive 'forbidden planet' orbits a strangely tiny star only 4 times its size. by Rifletree
learn from the pam tree facing storms and hurricanes yet it grows taller with patience and resilience little grasshopper
ri-mackin t1_j9w0ezx wrote
Short people are famously more affected by gravity, hence why they're shorter. The more gravity you put in a space ship, the more gas it takes to get to space. And since everybody's worried about climate change, they can't use more gas and diesel is too heavy for a space ship.
molbion t1_j9w050j wrote
Reply to comment by Jonesdeclectice in why should the heigh of astronaut matter 🤔 by Ok-Medium-1853
So you only have to be ~5’2”? OP must be quite tiny to see this as a big issue.
[deleted] t1_j9vzuk9 wrote
[removed]
kenpocory t1_j9vzekb wrote
Because you have to be this tall to ride this ride?
[deleted] t1_j9vz94k wrote
[removed]
TravelerMSY t1_j9vz1jx wrote
Just like their equipment has specifications, so do the people.
Mustang46L t1_j9vywlu wrote
Reply to comment by Adeldor in Which space launch are you most excited for in 2023? by DealCommercial348
Starship, because we get to see if it's gonna work or fail. It's important to know either way. Super excited if that damn thing lives up to the hype.
Cranktique t1_j9w4urf wrote
Reply to comment by whitneyanson in Massive 'forbidden planet' orbits a strangely tiny star only 4 times its size. by Rifletree
It hasn’t refuted anything because they haven’t confirmed anything. JWST is the next step to see if they can determine star / planet composition and therefore mass to see if it does still fit into our current models or not, and even then it won’t be definitive. Even the article states that it has the potential to challenge our understanding, they did not say it refutes our understanding as we do not have enough information yet to make that claim.