Recent comments in /f/space
[deleted] t1_j9xaujb wrote
Reply to Alien hunters get a boost as AI helps identify promising signals from space by UniOfManchester
[removed]
[deleted] t1_j9xanl4 wrote
[removed]
Super-Gerd OP t1_j9xacsr wrote
Reply to comment by pcockcock in What’s a good upgrade from a telescope that can barely see jupiters stripes that isn’t worth a kidney? by Super-Gerd
Thank you
dolphin37 t1_j9x91fs wrote
Reply to comment by FallWanderBranch in Massive 'forbidden planet' orbits a strangely tiny star only 4 times its size. by Rifletree
Won’t somebody think of the children!
digitalbilly t1_j9x8zux wrote
Reply to comment by digitalbilly in NASA confirms 1,000lb meteorite slammed into Texas | As good time as any for European Space Agency to announce a 2030 asteoroid-spotting mission by chrisdh79
Any earthlings dead?
pcockcock t1_j9x8f43 wrote
Reply to What’s a good upgrade from a telescope that can barely see jupiters stripes that isn’t worth a kidney? by Super-Gerd
/r/telescopes is the sub to ask about such things. They even have good Beginner's Guide pinned.
[deleted] t1_j9x7s2b wrote
Reply to comment by CromulentDucky in Massive 'forbidden planet' orbits a strangely tiny star only 4 times its size. by Rifletree
[removed]
Triabolical_ t1_j9x7r4u wrote
Reply to comment by mfb- in After Vulcan comes online, ULA plans to dramatically increase launch cadence by OutlandishnessOk2452
I'm just pointing out that announced launches do not always translate to actual launches.
MasonCO91 t1_j9x7lj0 wrote
Reply to Massive 'forbidden planet' orbits a strangely tiny star only 4 times its size. by Rifletree
All articles from space .com should be banned from this sub. They are filled with garbage
Triabolical_ t1_j9x7l11 wrote
Reply to comment by digifa in After Vulcan comes online, ULA plans to dramatically increase launch cadence by OutlandishnessOk2452
Which orbits?
Wrt fairings, iirc SpaceX has an extended fairing launch as part of NSSL. They also have a vertical integration one.
thaexistentialist t1_j9x7kpm wrote
This Butterstuff Indica I just picked up has me targeting the asteroid belt.
[deleted] t1_j9x6vcy wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_j9x6f2b wrote
[removed]
Tonderandrew t1_j9x6a6m wrote
Most likely the one right now the Soviets are sending up right now to rescue the stranded crew.
valcatosi t1_j9x5jzi wrote
Reply to comment by mfb- in After Vulcan comes online, ULA plans to dramatically increase launch cadence by OutlandishnessOk2452
>The second stage of Zhuque-2 uses methalox, too.
You're right, I stand corrected. I'm too used to Chinese rockets using solids.
mfb- t1_j9x4nmw wrote
Reply to comment by valcatosi in After Vulcan comes online, ULA plans to dramatically increase launch cadence by OutlandishnessOk2452
The second stage of Zhuque-2 uses methalox, too.
I think "reaching orbit with a rocket that uses methane in at least one stage" is a somewhat interesting race. After decades of rocketry without methalox we now have several companies/rockets trying to do that within a year or so.
[deleted] t1_j9x4epp wrote
[deleted]
mfb- t1_j9x4851 wrote
Reply to comment by DBDude in After Vulcan comes online, ULA plans to dramatically increase launch cadence by OutlandishnessOk2452
> The Raptor is doing fine
Most landing failures were linked to the engines not starting up properly. The recent static fire was done with 31/33 because two engines had issues. Compared to a landing this is less critical during a launch because of the large redundancy, but they clearly need to work on that for routine flights.
mfb- t1_j9x3owe wrote
Reply to comment by digifa in After Vulcan comes online, ULA plans to dramatically increase launch cadence by OutlandishnessOk2452
> and both the Atlas and Delta both have very specific high-energy orbits that the Falcon cannot offer—even when it is used fully expendable
That's why Falcon Heavy exists... besides, Atlas and Delta are retiring, they cannot get new launches anyway.
> Other than that, they have their proven track record of decades of reliability.
The currently active version of Falcon 9, Block 5, has a 149/149 track record. Falcon Heavy is at 5/5. All these launches were made in the last 6 years, which is a much better indication of current performance than launches from 1990.
Poopy_Paws t1_j9x3cr6 wrote
It was said to have happened before. Makes me wonder if the resurfacing is nonstop. It just keeps on oozing lava out or if they all go once every few million years. Or both.
[deleted] t1_j9x3aa8 wrote
[removed]
mfb- t1_j9x2zga wrote
Reply to comment by Triabolical_ in After Vulcan comes online, ULA plans to dramatically increase launch cadence by OutlandishnessOk2452
You think Bezos is going to SpaceX?
Amazon already bought every large rocket that's not SpaceX. Maybe they get a few Neutron launches.
mfb- t1_j9x2wn6 wrote
Reply to comment by Anderopolis in After Vulcan comes online, ULA plans to dramatically increase launch cadence by OutlandishnessOk2452
Flying every two weeks is 25 launches per year. Let 10 of them be for the US government, then you can go through the Kuiper manifest in 2.5 years. "a couple of times a month" sounds even faster than 2 per month.
[deleted] t1_j9x2tw9 wrote
Reply to comment by Historical_Gur_3054 in Study Finds Venus’ ‘Squishy’ Outer Shell May Be Resurfacing the Planet by burtzev
[removed]
[deleted] t1_j9xb6wd wrote
Reply to Which space launch are you most excited for in 2023? by DealCommercial348
[removed]