Recent comments in /f/space
jossief1 t1_jaao76z wrote
Reply to Who pays for space debris removal? by DevilsRefugee
The company or government that launched them. Constellation operators have major interest in removal services, but also there are new regulations that require them to deorbit within 5 years of end of mission. Even if the satellites have the ability to maneuver themselves, failed satellites would need help from a removal service.
https://www.fcc.gov/document/fcc-adopts-new-5-year-rule-deorbiting-satellites
Zenguro t1_jaanyja wrote
Maybe start thinking about the actions that are space related, that players would do.
Is it about politics? Resource management? Is it more like playing a hero-character and fighting stuff? Are you searching for stuff (exploring) and you need something to complete a mission (-> racing condition)?
[deleted] t1_jaan4oi wrote
Stardustquarks t1_jaamga2 wrote
Reply to comment by Topsyye in China unveils lunar lander to put astronauts on the moon by kevindavis338
Yeah, they're def after us - I'm just wondering when we'll respond...
Topsyye t1_jaam9xp wrote
Reply to comment by Stardustquarks in China unveils lunar lander to put astronauts on the moon by kevindavis338
Kinda already begun tbh. especially with this counter starlink constellation stuff they recently set up.
[deleted] t1_jaals8e wrote
JetAmoeba t1_jaalfjm wrote
Reply to comment by Astromike23 in My two year progress shooting Jupiter, using the same $300 telescope! by theillini19
I actually saw it for the first time with my bare eyes just a couple weeks ago! (Well knowingly, I’m sure I’ve seen it hundreds of times over the years and just assumed it was a bright star lol)
Alexstarfire t1_jaal7z1 wrote
Reply to comment by stevep98 in Who pays for space debris removal? by DevilsRefugee
This person knows what's up.
ObviousGazelle t1_jaakxbz wrote
Reply to headlands international dark sky park? by [deleted]
I haven't been but I love Cherry Springs in Pennsylvania. Actually caught a shadow at my feet from only the milky way there, on a moonless night. It was magical. Check it out it's a state park built for astronomy and the only dark territory on the east coast.
Kantrh t1_jaakrwi wrote
Reply to comment by MoreGull in The Case for Callisto by MoreGull
Going all the way to Callisto to mine it still wouldn't make sense.
Uranium is actually one of the more common elements in the crust. It's just about finding an economically viable concentration and going to Callisto isn't. Aside from the fact that the surface is covered in Ice
WaveLaVague t1_jaak7ru wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in My two year progress shooting Jupiter, using the same $300 telescope! by theillini19
-
What is this ?
-
The Truth.
-
About what ?
-
The dads who never came back. That's where they all went.
-
That's sounds stupid, I don't get what you m/
-
Yes ! Yes you do. We all do. They taught us since we are young, boys will be boys. AND they told us where boys go, and why. We just repeated it without paying attention. But now I have the proof, guessed their path ,saw them takeoff, I KNOW! the Truth.
So now tell me [whoever replies]... ####WHERE DO BOYS GO... AND WHY?
MoreGull OP t1_jaaj5ce wrote
Reply to comment by ObviousGazelle in The Case for Callisto by MoreGull
Indeed. Another reason to skip Mars entirely.
Stardustquarks t1_jaaj23k wrote
So when do we start the real space race with China??
longhegrindilemna t1_jaaj16h wrote
At least NASA can say they are relying on Boeing, ULA, and Blue Origin to get Americans to the moon, and relying on Collins Aerospace to build a new spacesuit.
The ability of NASA to ignore SpaceX and continue handing over hundreds of millions to low-yielding subcontractors spread across different congressional districts, is amazing.
Just to be clear: /s
ObviousGazelle t1_jaaiwqt wrote
Reply to comment by MoreGull in The Case for Callisto by MoreGull
You forget mars has an atmosphere. Thin, but it's there. The question when choosing the two will be this: Can humans build radiation shielding good enough to live permanently on Mars, and of not then what are the trade offs because Callisto has no atmosphere for aerobraking... So which challenge is solvable first?
MoreGull OP t1_jaaivwk wrote
Reply to comment by Kantrh in The Case for Callisto by MoreGull
What If uranium is super scarce on Earth....
zoinkability t1_jaaijqu wrote
Reply to headlands international dark sky park? by [deleted]
Yes, it is a lovely spot! Fairly dark skies, at least to the west (Mackinaw City to the east makes that side a bit bright).
Kantrh t1_jaaig9u wrote
Reply to comment by MoreGull in The Case for Callisto by MoreGull
The energy cost to bring that uranium back is immense though.
Bewaretheicespiders t1_jaahkxr wrote
Unveils a concept. Its a bit like Dynetics, but stages vertically instead of horizontally. Its meant to ditches the first stage shortly *before* landing on the moon.
PandaEven3982 t1_jaagxoz wrote
Well, I figured getting to space, for Humanity, is really going to be an everybody effort. Study Ernest Callenbach, current state of the art in post scarcity, and build that game that slowly gets people ready for a world wide effort.
[deleted] t1_jaag2gz wrote
Reply to comment by andygates2323 in Which space launch are you most excited for in 2023? by DealCommercial348
[removed]
[deleted] t1_jaae83e wrote
[removed]
GunFodder t1_jaadq0x wrote
Reply to comment by LeicaM6guy in Clouds of Jupiter. Credits: (NASA/JPL-Caltech/ SwRI/MSSS/David Marriott) by Davicho77
I don't care what anyone says, that remains one of my favorite horror movies.
[deleted] t1_jaaclrr wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_jaaor8q wrote
Reply to Who pays for space debris removal? by DevilsRefugee
[removed]