Recent comments in /f/space
easilyshot t1_jab9s9l wrote
Reply to comment by CosmosGamer99 in Trouble finding a orbital trajectory calculator by CosmosGamer99
Then it's probably a trade secret, you should use what has been confirmed is fine. Not a reasoning for your OCD to kick in for. It is just a theoretical entry. Anything we build will be destroyed in jupiter/saturn atmosphere anyways.
Exciting-Release-284 OP t1_jab9i3u wrote
Reply to comment by Hk-Neowizard in If space could have noise what would it be? by Exciting-Release-284
I will have to check that out haha
[deleted] t1_jab9hdc wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_jab9h7q wrote
[removed]
Exciting-Release-284 OP t1_jab9e7z wrote
Reply to comment by triffid_hunter in If space could have noise what would it be? by Exciting-Release-284
I should have specified the only effect is sound XD
I love this comment
FrozenToonies t1_jab9a39 wrote
Maybe something here or as starting place?
Hk-Neowizard t1_jab97ss wrote
Constant, never ending loop of PowerWolf's Resurrection By Eraction on full volume.
PB_Mack t1_jab90tw wrote
Reply to The Case for Callisto by MoreGull
I think the Moon would be better. It's so much closer, and way more economical.
triffid_hunter t1_jab8h9k wrote
The sun alone would hit something like 140dB from here, so we'd all be deaf - and that's assuming we don't get roasted and shredded simultaneously by Earth sweeping through this atmosphere of yours at 30km/s before losing enough speed to fall into the sun.
Arcosim t1_jab8g8r wrote
Reply to comment by Bewaretheicespiders in China unveils lunar lander to put astronauts on the moon by kevindavis338
> China dumps toxic hypergolic stages on its villages
Not anymore, all these launches are taking place at the Wenchang Spacecraft Launch Site on Hainan Island since 2020.
[deleted] t1_jab8efl wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_jab83zf wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_jab83wl wrote
[removed]
CosmosGamer99 OP t1_jab7lzl wrote
Reply to comment by easilyshot in Trouble finding a orbital trajectory calculator by CosmosGamer99
I meant time constraints as in the theoretical mission time, not time to do the project. I have plenty of time to do the project. And I have googled it, but as per my original post, I could not find any that did more than a simple Hohmann transfer.
[deleted] t1_jab73q1 wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_jab71zg wrote
Reply to The Case for Callisto by MoreGull
[removed]
[deleted] t1_jab6uem wrote
[removed]
easilyshot t1_jab4w4b wrote
Reasons to not put off shit to the last moment. I'd say Google it.
ICLazeru t1_jab4ci0 wrote
Reply to The Case for Callisto by MoreGull
Sounds like it could work provided fusion gets off the ground as an energy source.
Hosni__Mubarak t1_jab4b0g wrote
Reply to comment by ObviousGazelle in The Case for Callisto by MoreGull
Can’t you use the orbital mechanics of Jupiter to aerobrake yourself?
[deleted] t1_jab3bfw wrote
Reply to comment by danielravennest in Why are Most Meteorites Found in Antarctica? by ChieftainMcLeland
[deleted]
Kellymcdonald78 t1_jab2wuj wrote
Reply to comment by Bewaretheicespiders in China unveils lunar lander to put astronauts on the moon by kevindavis338
It would have been below
Bewaretheicespiders t1_jab2mxf wrote
Reply to comment by longhegrindilemna in China unveils lunar lander to put astronauts on the moon by kevindavis338
Boeing sucks, but SpaceX's Starship is Nasa's only authorised lunar lander at the moment, so its not really fair to say Nasa is ignoring SpaceX to go to the moon.
Lirdon t1_jaba3i0 wrote
Reply to comment by triffid_hunter in If space could have noise what would it be? by Exciting-Release-284
That’s the realistic answer. But even that is assuming this interplanetary atmosphere would just suddenly appear out of nowhere. If it would exist throughout history, our star system would look very different indeed