Recent comments in /f/space
iodine_breakfast t1_jafixtv wrote
Why bother with nuance when "Satellite constellation SLAMS astronomers" will get more clicks?
aradil t1_jaf4yzm wrote
Reply to comment by EricPostpischil in Black holes may be quietly generating the force that is tearing the universe apart, experts say by dr_gus
It’s the name of her YouTube channel and the name she appears to go by on there.
[deleted] t1_jaf4yh9 wrote
Reply to We need more rules for space junk and moon bases, NASA and US officials say by DevilsRefugee
[removed]
dbx999 t1_jaf4rk9 wrote
Reply to comment by SpearOfNeptune in Video of the Starlink V2 satellites being deployed. by DawgTheHallMonitor
Light pollution on the ground ruins the night sky
dbx999 t1_jaf4nr1 wrote
Reply to comment by DefinitelyNotSnek in Video of the Starlink V2 satellites being deployed. by DawgTheHallMonitor
If you want a maritime subscription (to use on a ship), that's like $5,000/mo
typo9292 t1_jaf44tz wrote
Reply to comment by CharlieH_ in We need more rules for space junk and moon bases, NASA and US officials say by DevilsRefugee
You’re making the mistake of thinking china thinks the way you do. They don’t. How are things going climate change agreements? They turn on a new coal power plant a week. If it benefits them they will do it and screw the consequences.
rocketsocks t1_jaf41q6 wrote
It would seem to be so easy to take advantage of all the oxygen in the air but it turns out to generally be extremely not worth the trouble.
The first major problem is just getting the air and making use of it, which is insanely complicated and requires lots of complex machinery. We're talking turbojet, ramjet, or scramjet engines. And while it may seem that a rocket engine is insanely complex, they are actually a lot simpler than jet engines in many regards. The first liquid fueled rocket propelled vehicle flew about 20 years before the first jet powered aircraft, for example. Even more so it's incredibly difficult to design air breathing engines which operate over wide ranges of speeds and altitudes. Consider the SR-71 and the ridiculous level of engineering that went into that and how those speeds and altitudes are just baby steps compared to orbital launch. It takes about a minute and 45 seconds for a Falcon 9 to surpass the speed and altitude of the SR-71. It is very challenging to build an airbreathing engine that would be worth its weight.
Once you add airbreathing to a launch vehicle you would want to spend more time in denser atmosphere in order to maximize its usefulness. However, that's very problematic for several reasons. For one it creates much more drag to spend so much time in denser atmosphere, which saps efficiency. For another it adds more aerodynamic heating and strong aerodynamic forces forcing you to add more heat protection and increase the strength of the vehicle. All of which adds weight, complexity, and potential failure modes.
In contrast, if you just say no to airbreathing at all you end up with a simpler vehicle that only has rocket engines (saving weight and complexity) and you have a much simpler optimization problem for launch. You can climb out of the thick atmosphere early and do the majority of acceleration in vacuum or near vacuum.
EricPostpischil t1_jaf3wnb wrote
Reply to comment by thetomahawk42 in Black holes may be quietly generating the force that is tearing the universe apart, experts say by dr_gus
I think the quotes were to point out the previous commenter’s use of Dr. Smethurst’s first name in that way could be considered diminutive. Unless Dr. Smethurst prefers to be known as Dr. Becky or the commenter has a personal relationship justifying the familiarity, it may be impolite to use “Dr. Becky.” If she does use that form, antiquemule may have been unaware of it or may consider it impolite nonetheless.
Ill-Manufacturer8654 t1_jaf3vqg wrote
Reply to comment by thetomahawk42 in Black holes may be quietly generating the force that is tearing the universe apart, experts say by dr_gus
The correct title would be: Dr. Smethurst.
"Dr. Becky" is a light hearted informal youtube name and I think the quotes are valid. It's got a "Dr. Nick!" quality too it.
mysalamileg t1_jaf3g4b wrote
Reply to comment by What_U_KNO in Video of the Starlink V2 satellites being deployed. by DawgTheHallMonitor
Who gives a flying fuck. Does that mean it doesn't work? No
[deleted] t1_jaf3eyl wrote
Shoddy_Lifeguard_852 t1_jaf3c6r wrote
Reply to Black holes may be quietly generating the force that is tearing the universe apart, experts say by dr_gus
Sounds the same as politicians. Behind the scenes, they quietly generate enough force and then tear us apart...only they use taxes.
fritterstorm t1_jaf3c4x wrote
Reply to comment by Zebrahead69 in We need more rules for space junk and moon bases, NASA and US officials say by DevilsRefugee
Yeah, it’s pretty naked here.
[deleted] t1_jaf2fet wrote
HeebieMcJeeberson t1_jaf2eit wrote
There are a ton of variables but yes it's possible.
A red dwarf's luminosity is between a tenth and a ten-thousandth of our sun's, so even the brightest ones are dim. But sunlight hitting the planet Mercury is about 7x as bright as on Earth, and we've already observed exoplanets that are closer to their suns than Mercury is to ours. So a planet close to a red dwarf could theoretically get as much daylight as we do.
Also, lots of plant life exists in very low light conditions on Earth - and not just mushrooms etc. growing in caves. Plants under rainforest cover get as little as 2% of full sunlight. That's very much in the range of what plants out in the open could get on a world orbiting a red dwarf.
Fortune090 t1_jaf254x wrote
Reply to comment by slackforce in Black holes may be quietly generating the force that is tearing the universe apart, experts say by dr_gus
Matt O'Dowd! Absolute treasure. PBS Space Time is incredible too.
[deleted] t1_jaf213i wrote
[deleted] t1_jaf1zm1 wrote
DCTron t1_jaf1mmr wrote
Reply to comment by ioncloud9 in We need more rules for space junk and moon bases, NASA and US officials say by DevilsRefugee
China isn’t going to follow them. Look at how they’ve treated disputed territory in the South China Sea.
TimJoyce t1_jaf1c4k wrote
Reply to comment by Bewaretheicespiders in Interesting take on SpaceX’s 2023 Revenue by KotesFolly_
Companies seem to be betting on IPO window opening agaim late this year. If I’m not mistaken Reddit is aiming to IPO.
_Hexagon__ t1_jaf19xf wrote
Reply to Starting again with space by Drotkowski
Youtuber Scott Manley and Everyday Astronaut for fun and interesting lessons on space, rockets and how it all works. The video game Kerbal space program for a fun and refreshing way to learn complicated things like orbital rendezvous or interplanetary missions in an easy and fun way. Books like "Carrying the fire" by Michael Collins or "Failure is not an option" by Gene Kranz to learn about the space race, the life of an astronaut and the Apollo program. TV shows like "From the earth to the moon" from HBO, "For all mankind" from appleTV and movies like Apollo 13 and First Man.
Uhdoyle t1_jaf17j2 wrote
Reply to comment by Professor226 in Black holes may be quietly generating the force that is tearing the universe apart, experts say by dr_gus
Yeah it’s stress-energy conservation, specifically
edit: for those curious https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stress%E2%80%93energy_tensor
Kampassuihla t1_jaf13qg wrote
Reply to comment by isleepinahammock in The Case for Callisto by MoreGull
- Jebediah feeds the chickens and Jacob plows
Professor226 t1_jaf0twm wrote
Reply to comment by Tjam3s in Black holes may be quietly generating the force that is tearing the universe apart, experts say by dr_gus
As I understand it increasing the of mass of a blackhole REQUIRES the creation of negative energy for conservation. Like when I figure skater pulls their arms in the have to spin faster.
New_Poet_338 t1_jafl3a9 wrote
Reply to Satellite Constellations Are an Existential Threat for Astronomy by ChieftainMcLeland
Time to move more Astronomy off-world. It is moving that way anyways. The moon would be a good place to set up an observatory. How many 7 m mirrors can you fit in a Starship?