Recent comments in /f/space

CptHammer_ t1_jaot0do wrote

>That was never the purpose of Fermi's research.

I never said it was.

>Please do explain how weak interaction (Fermi's interaction) was the study of clean energy.

It was the study of its potential use, who said he first that thought of use as an energy source?

Forget that question, how was it research to make a bomb specifically?

In fact so many people were talking about it as a use for an energy source that it seemed like a universal inevitable conclusion to Fermi's findings and therefore it would likely be impossible to point at who said clean energy first.

Should I point out that your favorite weapon making project first produced an energy reactor? Probably not because you don't think clean energy was the focus of the discovery before the government tried to weaponize it. In fact many at the time were saying that an energy reactor could cause it to be an accidental bomb which is what peeked the war machine's interest into turning it into an on purpose bomb.

1

flowering_sun_star t1_jao9klh wrote

Heh, for my DPhil I basically relied entirely on Arxiv. There were very few occasions where I'd look at the journal's version of a paper.

It's a little surreal really - all the institutions pay great sums for access to various physics journals, and none of the researches actually have to use it because the web interface for arxiv.org is more convenient!

7

Glittering_Leading93 t1_jao1ioo wrote

Absolutely. In addition is insane they’re just getting started. Finally starting to master production. Going to be a very interesting next decade. People can say what they want of Musk. What spacex accomplished as an organization is nothing short of a miracle. As you said “science fiction”

68