Recent comments in /f/space

Bensemus t1_jbqgglb wrote

Germany tried to avoid conflict with Russia by trading with it. The hope was that the economic repunctuations would make war too expensive. That didn't' work.

With China trade does seem to be preventing any conflict but people aren't confident that it will hold forever. China is illegally building islands in the South China Sea to claim resource rich waters as theirs and are ignoring the legitimate claims from the countries around the sea.

The spy balloon also damaged political relationships between China and the US.

I'm not saying the US's way is right. I would however argue their way is more right that what China and Russia seem to want.

1

UnderwaterMoose2020 t1_jbqcdar wrote

One of my favourite ways to go to sleep is to listen to my MP3 player, especially audio books about space. Also the radio 4 program "In Our Time" has some good MP3 downloads of past episodes, the ones about space or general science discussions are very good for mental distraction.

Alternatively find some long cosmology videos on YouTube and record the audio.

From a meditation point of view, the big picture, likely infinite universes, do mean that on that scale our existence is insignificant, there is some comfort to be had from that. But on the other hand without conscious life the universe has no meaning. So as well as being made from star dust we give the universe the ability to reflect on itself. Not bad for an insignificant ape descendent.

Personally I tend to overthink things and live too much in my head. Getting outside and smelling the flowers and seeing the beauty and even making bubbles in the garden is recommended.

3

msocial t1_jbqawsv wrote

I do the same! I thought I was the only one. I think about the insignificance of things in comparison to the expanse of the universe. How heaven only belongs to us because we are bigger than other animals or insects, when in reality we are tiny ourselves.

To make things or problems even more insignicant, think about the billions of people who have lived and died before us. Our time will come and pass. In the end, no one will care.

3

ferrel_hadley t1_jbpv954 wrote

This screams cutting back on quality control to me. Same issue in three systems means your QA is not focussing resource onto making sure that system is not going to break again. Given Soyuz and Progress have 50 years of flights with relatively few incidents (Soyuz 56 years, Progress 44 years) they are pretty robust so likely could absorb some drop in production standards and quality assurance. But it seems they have cut the bone so fine they are producing the same fault and their teams are not testing enough for it.

The budget for that is now probably floating somewhere in the Black Sea with Rogozins name on it.

The fleet should be grounded for a serious investigation, but there is no way that is going to happen politically.

24

RoseCroix343 t1_jbprglt wrote

I have severe anxiety as well but have really overcome it to a huge extent by constant studying of subjects I loved (ancient civilizations and their spiritual beliefs and practices as well as the cosmos as it tends to tie in among a few other topics that tie in as well). After many years of studying the anxious part of my brain turned into a meditative and contemplative part of thinking instead. My anxiety was cast aside and it is like I can hold a meditation while thinking about regular subjects. Very strange but lifesaving for me.

5

mfb- t1_jbp2iaf wrote

We had one replacement, yes, but what about the second replacement?

The nominal Soyuz MS-24 launch is in June, sending three new people up (2*Russia, 1*US, Kononenko could beat the record for total time in space). If this leak pattern holds then MS-23 could develop a problem around late May/early June.

25

grounded_astronut t1_jboysdp wrote

Google Translate doesn't do a terrible job on it. This seems like the most important paragraph:

​

>If it is really a problem in production, then the Soyuz MS-23 spacecraft, on which Prokopiev, Petelin and Rubio should return to Earth, could theoretically have a similar defect. A trend can be observed in the amount of time ships spend in orbit prior to leak incidents. Soyuz MS-22 was launched on September 21, and depressurization occurred on December 15. Progress MS-21 went into orbit on October 26, and leaked on February 11. It turns out that both ships lasted about three months. Soyuz MS-23 launched on February 24, and if it's a manufacturing defect, its days of full-time work may expire as early as early summer.
>
>Under these conditions, the earlier launch of Soyuz MS-24, which will allow updating the ISS crew and returning Soyuz MS-23 to Earth, is justified, Izvestia's interlocutors believe.

30