Recent comments in /f/space
ThePoliteCrab t1_jc09x1d wrote
Reply to What if The Universe Has Always Existed by GhostCallOut2
The very idea that time passes differently around black holes is part of Relativity. Relativity implies the universe is not static, I.E it is expanding. The universe having a beginning was first suggested by Relativity. These two things do not work without the other also being true.
[deleted] t1_jc09mis wrote
Reply to What if The Universe Has Always Existed by GhostCallOut2
[removed]
[deleted] t1_jc09jrj wrote
Reply to What if The Universe Has Always Existed by GhostCallOut2
[removed]
[deleted] t1_jc09iaz wrote
Reply to What if The Universe Has Always Existed by GhostCallOut2
[removed]
toatsblooby t1_jc09hwy wrote
Reply to Pillars of Creation - cropped them differently and rotated to show their "frame" by Rockclimber88
And the beautiful eagle nebula to the left of the pillars in this shot!
[deleted] t1_jc08ztb wrote
[removed]
original_4degrees t1_jc08tmu wrote
Reply to comment by ssavrass in The largest NASA Hubble Space Telescope image ever assembled, this sweeping bird’s-eye view of a portion of the Andromeda galaxy. Credit: NASA, ESA by Davicho77
it's coming this way. just give it a few years.
[deleted] t1_jc067id wrote
Reply to Waning Gibbous Moon by Eclipse489
[removed]
[deleted] t1_jc04ewj wrote
[removed]
drmirage809 t1_jc03kz2 wrote
Reply to comment by MrSnow702 in Pillars of Creation - cropped them differently and rotated to show their "frame" by Rockclimber88
They are what is known as a stellar nursery. Inside these pillars of gas stars are being formed in truly breathtaking numbers. Looking up close you can see the young stars shining through the clouds.
Sadly they no longer exists. The light we are seeing is about 7000 thousand years old and in those years they've probably been blown apart by the stellar wind of all the stars that have formed inside them.
Rockclimber88 OP t1_jc03jgb wrote
Reply to comment by MrSnow702 in Pillars of Creation - cropped them differently and rotated to show their "frame" by Rockclimber88
The pillars are that "hand" in the middle. It's a famous photo taken by Hubble telescope in 1995. "These elephant trunks had been discovered by John Charles Duncan in 1920 on a plate made with the Mount Wilson Observatory 60-inch telescope"
Usually they're shown more zoomed in(newer photo from 2014) https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/6/68/Pillars_of_creation_2014_HST_WFC3-UVIS_full-res_denoised.jpg
[deleted] t1_jc0218n wrote
Reply to comment by Jazzlike-Outcome711 in Milky Way over Uruguayan Lighthouse. Credit: Mauricio Salazar by Davicho77
[removed]
ssavrass t1_jc01mta wrote
Reply to The largest NASA Hubble Space Telescope image ever assembled, this sweeping bird’s-eye view of a portion of the Andromeda galaxy. Credit: NASA, ESA by Davicho77
Man it is so disappointing that Andromeda is so faint. If we could see it with the naked eye it’d look 5 times bigger than the moon.
[deleted] t1_jc015nr wrote
[removed]
Jazzlike-Outcome711 t1_jbzzyda wrote
Can you see the Milky Way like this with the naked eye?
cpick93 t1_jbzzhi9 wrote
Reply to Waning Gibbous Moon by Eclipse489
Not to be confused with the Gibby moon which is just the kid from iCarlys butt.
[deleted] t1_jbzymhn wrote
Reply to Waning Gibbous Moon by Eclipse489
[removed]
MrSnow702 t1_jbzwsav wrote
Reply to Pillars of Creation - cropped them differently and rotated to show their "frame" by Rockclimber88
Can someone ELI5 why these are called the pillars of creation? And what are they exactly?
Fillsfo t1_jbzve4x wrote
Reply to Soyuz MS-23 may share design flaw with MS-22 and Progress MS-21. Soyuz MS-24 may launch earlier than planned. by AWildDragon
Anyone who has manufactured complex systems knows that one of the benefits of serial production is that problems tend to repeat until you find and solve the root cause
I'm not saying this isn't a defect their qc system would have caught in the past but it is possible the root cause is some new failure mode the system is currently unable to catch.
I would not berate the Russian engineers until the facts come out
Do recall that we lost two space shuttles, one due to a management error launching when too cold. But the other was lost due to complacency. Seeing huge chunks of ice falling away and no problem resulting from it was a huge miss
I expect engineers around the world do their best on these things. Most really care. The tougher one is management. They are budget and time constrained and often not knowledgeable engineers. It is way easier to make the wrong call in these cases
As an engineer in the US who started out in aerospace, I'm astonished at how well the US and Russian space communities have held together given the world situation. It must be very difficult to collaborate effectively but they seem to be doing it much better than I would have hoped.
I recommend we cut them some slack and let them do their jobs with less heckling. They are all people like you and me.
[deleted] t1_jbzuuvs wrote
Reply to Waning Gibbous Moon by Eclipse489
[removed]
[deleted] t1_jbztvs0 wrote
[deleted] t1_jbztqng wrote
Reply to comment by astro_pettit in I captured this lightning-filled star trail from the International Space Station. More details in comments! by astro_pettit
[deleted]
Uncle_Charnia t1_jc0a07s wrote
Reply to comment by original_4degrees in The largest NASA Hubble Space Telescope image ever assembled, this sweeping bird’s-eye view of a portion of the Andromeda galaxy. Credit: NASA, ESA by Davicho77
Tis a consummation devoutly to be wished