You stated “Passively-aggressively attacking “ if you ever been to NYC then you would have a hard time socializing in this society because that’s basically our personality 😂 people have to stop being so soft about what random strangers say on the internet. But my apologies if I offended you . And also you stated i “didn’t even try to answer to it” well if you take a look at the other comments then nobody really answered with a direct answer. But hey bro this is space which involves people thinking like this since it’s just endless possibilities!! We are a grain of salt in the universe !

I perfectly know that the question cannot have a definite answer and we can only theorise, but your post didn't even try to answer to it and then you started passively-aggressively attacking anyone who pointed that out just like someone whose frontal lobe hasn't fully developed yet

Hello u/SireBlew, your submission "Why do movies set in space always show the people moving so slow?" has been removed from r/space because:

• Such questions should be asked in the "All space questions" thread stickied at the top of the sub.

Please read the rules in the sidebar and check r/space for duplicate submissions before posting. If you have any questions about this removal please message the r/space moderators. Thank you.

Hello u/EmbarrassedFriend693, your submission "If the universe goes for forever, will every event repeat itself? Or is it been happening?" has been removed from r/space because:

• Such questions should be asked in the "All space questions" thread stickied at the top of the sub.

Please read the rules in the sidebar and check r/space for duplicate submissions before posting. If you have any questions about this removal please message the r/space moderators. Thank you.

i bet you still in high school but once your frontal lobe fully develops after 25 then you’ll know how to understand that not every question has a right or wrong answer….if you can see the other comments left on this post then you can see everyone has different views on the question asked by OP

That would've been great. Just... A long, quiet shot, ship creaking, and she stands there all disheveled and crazy/sad eyes

But yours is not a response to his question

Your answer got me thinking. You say "things will get so incredibly far apart that the space between each object will make it impossible for them to interact". Is there a theory that we are actually in one of those objects? Like, our universe as we know it was smaller and part of something else, that at some point drifted so far away that we just cannot interact with the rest of it. So something similar to multiverse theory just that it's not parallel or anything much different than one drifted away part.

Bezos buys it, orbits the moon, buys a laser.

That would've been a way better ending, especially if they included some kind of "days alone" counter to show whether she holds out longer/by how much. it would've added so much weight to fishburne's comment about how pratt was drowning alone.

The payload space (as designed) fire Starship is shockingly close to the pressurized volume of the ISS (35k vs 33k cu ft)

Hey if you guys don’t want it I’ll take it off your hands. Just need it boost its orbit a bunch no prob

They're trying to convey the gravity of the situation!

I'll see myself out...

Every nut and bolt in there is something we spent million to lift into space. There ought to be something in there that can be recycled, we do still value that, right?

If it is infinitely spatially extended, it either repeats simply, or it "never repeats"- but you can always find a repetition for any finite region. Since our awareness is finite, this means yes - it "repeats".

But we don't know if it is infinitely spatially extensive. We can only see a tiny part of it, as far as we can surmise. It "looks like it keeps going", outside the 50 billion light year sphere we're looking at right now.

It will dismantle itself on the way down.

I read a proposed alternate ending to Passengers that I thought was great. Instead of he saves the ship, she forgives him, they live out the rest of their lives happily..She never forgives him, he dies saving the ship and now she is stranded alone on the ship..Final scene you see her finish a drink at the bar, say goodnight to the robot barman. Then you see an anguished look on her face as she stands over a cryopod looking down at a young man, realising she is about to make the same terrible decision to wake someone up.

[deleted]

Cool article. Personally, I'm still in camp MOND.

I don’t think you quite really understood what I’ve stated , so my response to your question would just go over your head ….

Very smart physicists and mathematicians posit that even if the universe is very big and not even ‘infinite’, there may be multiple copies just like us out there right now.

I do think the Eternal Return is more probable than not. There can only be something rather than nothing. And ‘something’ repeats. Forever.

To counter those saying ‘Infinity need not overlap’. True. But universes are closed sets that operate via natural laws. They may vary universe-to-universe, but this fact means universes aren’t simply ‘random values’.

Yes, I’m certain it repeats. In fact, I’m hopeful to live this life over again. Or, perhaps on repeat, but with small variations.

[removed]

Its fine to talk hypothetical but anyone who says they know should be disregarded

Leverage since they’re in micro gravity? If I throw a wrench on earth it’s easy to plant my foot and use that as leverage to throw something. Now try the same movement on the moon.

agree the orbit should be raised not lowered