Recent comments in /f/space
AlbaneseGummies327 OP t1_jcuweym wrote
Reply to comment by Due_Menu_893 in Fallen Astronaut statue and a name plaque left on the surface of the Moon by the crew of Apollo 15 by AlbaneseGummies327
Not that I know of.
[deleted] t1_jcurfvb wrote
Due_Menu_893 t1_jcuj65l wrote
Reply to comment by AlbaneseGummies327 in Fallen Astronaut statue and a name plaque left on the surface of the Moon by the crew of Apollo 15 by AlbaneseGummies327
That's beautiful. I wonder, are there more artists who have their art on other worlds?
AlbaneseGummies327 OP t1_jcuhtj5 wrote
Reply to comment by anymoredraw701 in Fallen Astronaut statue and a name plaque left on the surface of the Moon by the crew of Apollo 15 by AlbaneseGummies327
At some point it'll have to be a database on a flash drive.
[deleted] t1_jcufklp wrote
[deleted] t1_jcuf9yl wrote
anymoredraw701 t1_jcuedfm wrote
Reply to Fallen Astronaut statue and a name plaque left on the surface of the Moon by the crew of Apollo 15 by AlbaneseGummies327
We should’ve sent a second one with the Mars Laboratory.
The list has gotten quite a bit longer...:/
[deleted] t1_jcue2px wrote
[deleted] t1_jcudzbk wrote
AlbaneseGummies327 OP t1_jcud9xw wrote
Reply to Fallen Astronaut statue and a name plaque left on the surface of the Moon by the crew of Apollo 15 by AlbaneseGummies327
Fallen Astronaut is a 3.5-inch (8.9 cm) aluminum sculpture created by Belgian artist Paul Van Hoeydonck.
It is a stylized figure of an astronaut in a spacesuit, intended to commemorate the astronauts and cosmonauts who have died in the advancement of space exploration.
It was commissioned and placed on the Moon by the crew of Apollo 15 at Hadley Rille on August 2, 1971 UTC, next to a plaque listing 14 names of those who died up to that time. The statue lies on the ground among several footprints.
Earthfall10 t1_jctz367 wrote
Reply to comment by boundegar in Containing an incredible half-million stars, this 8-billion-year-old cosmic bauble is one of the largest and brightest globular clusters ever discovered. Credits: ESA/Hubble by Davicho77
The next half of the title literally says it's one of the largest and brightest globular clusters.
boundegar t1_jctynj7 wrote
Reply to comment by Earthfall10 in Containing an incredible half-million stars, this 8-billion-year-old cosmic bauble is one of the largest and brightest globular clusters ever discovered. Credits: ESA/Hubble by Davicho77
Is it? I don't know the number of stars in the average globular cluster. I guess the rest of you do. *hanging my head*
Earthfall10 t1_jctxvi1 wrote
Reply to comment by boundegar in Containing an incredible half-million stars, this 8-billion-year-old cosmic bauble is one of the largest and brightest globular clusters ever discovered. Credits: ESA/Hubble by Davicho77
Half a million stars is incredibly large for a globular cluster. I guess context is hard.
[deleted] t1_jctwcfm wrote
[deleted] t1_jctuxoz wrote
[removed]
HellBlazer1221 t1_jctogyt wrote
Reply to Containing an incredible half-million stars, this 8-billion-year-old cosmic bauble is one of the largest and brightest globular clusters ever discovered. Credits: ESA/Hubble by Davicho77
This beautiful picture causes me a lot of existential crisis and also helps relieve some of my stress. What is our life purpose amidst this ocean of wondrous creation.
BlueNotesBlues t1_jctihh6 wrote
Reply to comment by boundegar in Containing an incredible half-million stars, this 8-billion-year-old cosmic bauble is one of the largest and brightest globular clusters ever discovered. Credits: ESA/Hubble by Davicho77
You have an incredible one ton of sand in your house? There are millions of tons of sand on beaches. I guess numbers are hard.
axialintellectual t1_jcth8h9 wrote
Reply to comment by beef-o-lipso in Containing an incredible half-million stars, this 8-billion-year-old cosmic bauble is one of the largest and brightest globular clusters ever discovered. Credits: ESA/Hubble by Davicho77
It's still rare, but the orders of magnitude higher density, and the fact that globular clusters get quite old, means that there's a lot of opportunities. Here's a recent paper about the topic, if you want to read more.
beef-o-lipso t1_jctdq0p wrote
Reply to comment by axialintellectual in Containing an incredible half-million stars, this 8-billion-year-old cosmic bauble is one of the largest and brightest globular clusters ever discovered. Credits: ESA/Hubble by Davicho77
Thanks! I guess I wouldn't have expected much interaction between the systems.
axialintellectual t1_jctcpbv wrote
Reply to comment by beef-o-lipso in Containing an incredible half-million stars, this 8-billion-year-old cosmic bauble is one of the largest and brightest globular clusters ever discovered. Credits: ESA/Hubble by Davicho77
Good question! On the planet formation side: protoplanetary disks would be heavily irradiated by the other nearby stars, which tends to shorten the lifetime available to planet formation; they can also get disrupted by flyby-events. If a planetary system does form, those same flybys continue and can disrupt it over longer timescales. On the other hand, we don't - to the best of my knowledge - have very good constraints on planet occurrence rates in globular clusters, because they're far away and hard to observe, but I would say from a theoretical point of view these are quite well-understood mechanisms.
beef-o-lipso t1_jctc6ok wrote
Reply to comment by axialintellectual in Containing an incredible half-million stars, this 8-billion-year-old cosmic bauble is one of the largest and brightest globular clusters ever discovered. Credits: ESA/Hubble by Davicho77
Why would an increase in stellar density suppress planet formation? Curious.
GhostCallOut2 OP t1_jcuwtkk wrote
Reply to comment by Lirdon in What if The Universe Has Always Existed by GhostCallOut2
What if the universe is in a constant loop of creation and destruction? Let's say the big bang is correct, but if the universe expands and then comes back together, forming the ball of energy as the big bang states?
Thank you for that information, too. I hope to one day understand the universe in some sort of way. But what if there were millions of universes before ours? It's a constant loop of it being created. It wouldn't disprove anything we have since the Big Bang still happened, but it would change a lot about what we think about the universe.
This hypothesis would make much more since then the universe just always existing, basing it off of everything we know that is. I do still believe that the Big Bang isn't the answer, but I do believe it is a start of understanding it.