Recent comments in /f/space
Riptide360 t1_jd95djg wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in Industry sees missed opportunity in deorbiting ISS by ye_olde_astronaut
Save the hate. I just thought we could have a discussion about saving some space history by moving the station into higher orbit. No shortage of debris in space so I'm glad they are at least being responsible about the millions it will cost to deorbit ISS.
Andromeda321 t1_jd95611 wrote
Reply to The Northern Lights could dazzle the skies from Washington to New York on Friday, blown by winds from a giant 'hole' on the sun by thisisinsider
I have a love/hate relationship with these articles because they're always an excellent guarantee that it will be far too cloudy to see anything where I live!
[deleted] t1_jd9477t wrote
Reply to comment by seanflyon in Industry sees missed opportunity in deorbiting ISS by ye_olde_astronaut
[deleted]
Postnificent t1_jd93k29 wrote
Reply to comment by Majestic_Pitch_1803 in Couldn’t we land on an asteroid that is passing through our solar system and use that as a vessel for interstellar travel? by [deleted]
So catch up with the asteroid then speed it up? What’s the benefit? Mining it? Now you are describing a space mining venture not a means of transportation. I thought you were trying to use the velocity of the asteroid to travel. The only way to slow down in space is reverse propulsion or impact. Speeding up is rather simple, expell propellant. Your idea is just a mining operation. (We probably already do this, I don’t trust the news anymore than old Mother Hubbard)
seanflyon t1_jd927ww wrote
Reply to comment by Riptide360 in Industry sees missed opportunity in deorbiting ISS by ye_olde_astronaut
"Nope" what? Do you honestly think that maintaining the ISS is cheap? Did you get confused and reply to the wrong comment, or do you simply have no idea what you are talking about?
Riptide360 t1_jd90xfz wrote
Reply to comment by seanflyon in Industry sees missed opportunity in deorbiting ISS by ye_olde_astronaut
Nope. Space travel is like funding trips to the new world. One day Musk’s Tesla Starman in space will be as famous as Plymouth rock. https://spacein3d.com/where-is-starman-live-tracker/
Dismal-Philosopher-4 t1_jd90m6g wrote
Reply to Virgin Orbit raising $200 million from investor Matthew Brown, closing deal as soon as Thursday by cnbc_official
Wonder how much the controlling stake would be worth in case they still go bankrupt? is their tech and know-how still worth at least ~100m? or is having your own rocket-company just like a status-symbol in the current space-race?
danielravennest t1_jd90e6s wrote
Reply to comment by The_Solar_Oracle in A New Mission Will Search for Habitable Planets at Alpha Centauri by Aeromarine_eng
In particular, the Sun is a gravitational lens. If you travel about 800 AU in the opposite direction from Alpha Centauri, you can look back and see what is there in great detail, because the lens is 2 million km in diameter. One reason to be that far out is to make it easy to block out the Sun itself, including prominances and the solar corona.
Centauri is 276,000 AU, so using the Sun is a lot easier mission.
Taxington t1_jd90dib wrote
Reply to comment by tickleMyBigPoop in The SpaceX steamroller has shifted into a higher gear this year by returnofjuju
Your milage may vary by country.
>especially because the price you see online is the price you pay
In most western countries anything els is ilegal.
>Then there's supercharging stations.
EU don't allow that kind of anti consumer behavior all EVs use CCS. No propriety connectors, apple are currently getting fucked over that kind of nonsense.
danielravennest t1_jd8zgzp wrote
Reply to comment by teehuis in A New Mission Will Search for Habitable Planets at Alpha Centauri by Aeromarine_eng
Current technology is nuclear reactors and electric propulsion. We can feasibly get to 300 km/s with multiple stages. That makes Alpha Centauri 4250 years away.
But due to the "arrival paradox", a trip that long doesn't make sense to try. Assuming technology will keep improving, a later ship with better technology will be faster, and pass the older, slower ship before it arrives. Consider what our technology was like in 2,200 B.C. (4250 years ago).
Only if technology reaches a dead end, or the trips are short enough to not be passed before arrival (perhaps 50-100 years) does it make sense to try.
Our tech is already good enough to travel about 3 times the speed of the Voyagers, and catch up with them about the time their power gets so low we lose contact. If we really wanted to we could do that. We won't, since there are better and closer missions we can do instead.
seanflyon t1_jd8z46u wrote
Reply to comment by Riptide360 in Industry sees missed opportunity in deorbiting ISS by ye_olde_astronaut
> cheap
Maintaining the ISS is not cheap.
[deleted] t1_jd8z1wd wrote
[removed]
thisisinsider OP t1_jd8yzij wrote
Reply to The Northern Lights could dazzle the skies from Washington to New York on Friday, blown by winds from a giant 'hole' on the sun by thisisinsider
TL;DR — from the article:
- The Northern Lights could appear in the skies over some northern US states on Friday.
- The lights could be dazzling thanks to solar winds blowing from a giant coronal hole on the sun.
- The lights — known as aurora borealis — may be seen as far south as Washington and Michigan.
danielravennest t1_jd8xys1 wrote
Reply to comment by UnknownStrikex in A New Mission Will Search for Habitable Planets at Alpha Centauri by Aeromarine_eng
Yet another method is using the Sun both as a power source, and a gravitational lens to focus the beam on a ship in transit. Starshot is limited by the laser array size. The probe quickly gets too far to maintain beam focus.
So instead you build your laser array near the Sun, where power is plentiful. To start with you aim the beam directly at the vehicle. When it gets too far you switch to a relay mirror at ~800 AU. The Sun bends light by its gravity. In this case it makes a lens with a 2 million km diameter, which gives you astounding resolution.
The beam is used by the ship to power a particle accelerator. The first part of the trip the accelerator is pointed aft to speed up. Later it points the other way to slow down. Going the other way, your communications will be focused back to the relay mirror, so you can get data back.
[deleted] t1_jd8xmz0 wrote
Reply to comment by CMDR_Shazbot in The SpaceX steamroller has shifted into a higher gear this year by returnofjuju
[removed]
[deleted] t1_jd8xmyr wrote
[removed]
CMDR_Shazbot t1_jd8x6gf wrote
Reply to comment by Cycleguy57 in The SpaceX steamroller has shifted into a higher gear this year by returnofjuju
Here's more of elons genius input
Riptide360 t1_jd8x1bs wrote
Reply to comment by Martianspirit in Industry sees missed opportunity in deorbiting ISS by ye_olde_astronaut
When folks live in space they’ll want cheap places to go. Having a piece of living history is something of a rarity up there! At least the moon has a flag & moon buggy.
danielravennest t1_jd8w8wh wrote
Reply to comment by starhoppers in A New Mission Will Search for Habitable Planets at Alpha Centauri by Aeromarine_eng
It's hard to beat a laser-pushed lightsail going 1/8th the speed of light. The downside is the spacecraft will be tiny.
Martianspirit t1_jd8w747 wrote
Reply to comment by Riptide360 in Industry sees missed opportunity in deorbiting ISS by ye_olde_astronaut
Wrong. To be a museum it still needs to be maintained. Needs the ability to maneuver, to be kept pressurized. Still ability to actively deorbit needs to be maintained. All very, very expensive.
luckybipedal t1_jd8vyjo wrote
Reply to comment by boundegar in Research team finds indirect evidence for existence of dark matter surrounding black holes by karmagheden
They talk about dynamical friction, which is a result of gravitational interactions. It's new to me too. I found this high level explanation: https://astronomy.swin.edu.au/cosmos/D/Dynamical+Friction
00Askingquestions00 OP t1_jd8vj7k wrote
Reply to comment by Vernerator in Trying to understand the scale of the visible universe. by 00Askingquestions00
Ok. I appreciate the math. It's just to unimaginable to grasp the size. And that's the closest star.
Majestic_Pitch_1803 t1_jd8t3ku wrote
Reply to comment by b_a_t_m_4_n in Couldn’t we land on an asteroid that is passing through our solar system and use that as a vessel for interstellar travel? by [deleted]
For sure we are a ways off but perhaps you send smaller rovers that manufacturer these instruments once on board the asteroid, perhaps just deploying enough raw materials to give them a start.
Voyager for example just ran out of gas. As is expected. This is an issue you’d need to solve in such types of travel. Asteroids seem like a possible solution
Anonymous-USA t1_jd8rajw wrote
Reply to comment by Vernerator in Trying to understand the scale of the visible universe. by 00Askingquestions00
Since the Earth is “only” ~24K mi in circumference, you’d wrap around the equator over 5x. So it may be best to shrink that Earth from a tennis ball to a pea. Then ur only wrapping around once 😉
[deleted] t1_jd95nu4 wrote
Reply to The Northern Lights could dazzle the skies from Washington to New York on Friday, blown by winds from a giant 'hole' on the sun by thisisinsider
[removed]