Recent comments in /f/sports
as1126 t1_jbfe5om wrote
So, no Jets?
FStubbs t1_jbfcc6k wrote
Reply to comment by liger51 in Giants' Daniel Jones lands $160M deal; Saquon Barkley gets tag by BCLetsRide69
To be fair, it's 2023, not 2016.
[deleted] t1_jbex8ti wrote
[removed]
TheRoadDog87 t1_jbevsrr wrote
Reply to comment by Krogsly in Giants' Daniel Jones lands $160M deal; Saquon Barkley gets tag by BCLetsRide69
With the absolute clown show that the Giants have had at the coaching position... between McAdoo and Shurmur and Judge (and coordinators like Jason Garrett!?!?) ... given Daboll's success and winning coach of the year and all that, do you really think there is any chance they'd move on from here in the next 1-2 years?
Krogsly t1_jbekpiz wrote
Reply to comment by tommmey in Giants' Daniel Jones lands $160M deal; Saquon Barkley gets tag by BCLetsRide69
>Is there a team that would’ve paid even $120mil / 4 for him?
You're asking the wrong question, which you already answered by saying you're negotiating against yourselves. The real question is, who were the Giants going to sign instead? There is no way the media and fans let NYG get away with signing any other FA QB to a playoff team on the rise.
This contract isn't as bad as it sounds. They can still draft his replacement in a later round and be ready in 2-3 years. If you look at the QBs making less than 40m, the only players I would pick over Jones are due for even bigger paydays and their teams aren't letting them go.
Jones is their only option and he is now married to Daboll. If the NYG suck next year or the year after, you move on from both and let your new coach draft his guy. If they succeed, then you don't care about the money.
FCAsheville t1_jbeixea wrote
$160m and $82m guaranteed for a guy who threw 15 TDs in 16 games last season!
[deleted] t1_jbe8vbp wrote
[removed]
bpmdrummerbpm t1_jbdmqjk wrote
Reply to comment by 0bi_Wan_Jabroni in Ravens tag Lamar Jackson after no deal is reached by BCLetsRide69
And he’s a dipshit anti-vaxxer.
Fathletic231 t1_jbd7wp1 wrote
Reply to comment by earic23 in Ravens tag Lamar Jackson after no deal is reached by BCLetsRide69
I mean Aaron did pretty good with rookies
kingabbey1988 t1_jbcwvg7 wrote
Reply to comment by 0bi_Wan_Jabroni in Ravens tag Lamar Jackson after no deal is reached by BCLetsRide69
Only guy everyone thinks doesn’t need a wr because he can run. The Lamar hate getting out of hand honestly
drethnudrib t1_jbcwsm4 wrote
That's what a Duke education gets you.
0bi_Wan_Jabroni t1_jbcwkvg wrote
Reply to comment by kingabbey1988 in Ravens tag Lamar Jackson after no deal is reached by BCLetsRide69
No, just think he’s overrated by Ravens fans. Coasting off of one amazing season. He seems like a good guy, but I don’t think he’s handling this situation well (not saying he is wrong for trying to get as much money for himself and his family as possible, just that he might end up getting less than he would have if he played the situation differently).
liger51 t1_jbcu4xl wrote
Reply to comment by tommmey in Giants' Daniel Jones lands $160M deal; Saquon Barkley gets tag by BCLetsRide69
In 2016 Carr finished 3rd in the MVP voting, DJ has never been anywhere close to that level. But hey respect for owning your bias, I’m a Washington fan so I probably got some opposite bias going on in me haha
kingabbey1988 t1_jbcs0vv wrote
Reply to comment by earic23 in Ravens tag Lamar Jackson after no deal is reached by BCLetsRide69
Ok
earic23 t1_jbcru7v wrote
Reply to comment by kingabbey1988 in Ravens tag Lamar Jackson after no deal is reached by BCLetsRide69
He had the exact same passer rating this year as last year, 1 less td, and played less games. Idk where you think he fell off
fuqyu t1_jbcrkl2 wrote
Reply to comment by BlueTeale in Ravens tag Lamar Jackson after no deal is reached by BCLetsRide69
The business ramifications of this are interesting. Lamar gets to negotiate his value with other teams. Even if he doesn’t sign this year, he can gauge his value to the league. Baltimore gets to see how the league values him as well.
On top of that, Baltimore can pay him way less this season. I wonder if Lamar would prefer this tag or Exclusive? If that happens, he can’t shop around
kingabbey1988 t1_jbcqhgg wrote
Reply to comment by 0bi_Wan_Jabroni in Ravens tag Lamar Jackson after no deal is reached by BCLetsRide69
You just hate Lamar. Lol
kingabbey1988 t1_jbcq7sx wrote
Reply to comment by earic23 in Ravens tag Lamar Jackson after no deal is reached by BCLetsRide69
Allen falling off to huh?
tommmey t1_jbclo8u wrote
Reply to comment by liger51 in Giants' Daniel Jones lands $160M deal; Saquon Barkley gets tag by BCLetsRide69
Jones has been more accurate with less weapons and has a running game which Carr doesn’t. Yes, I think Jones is better than Carr but I’m also a Giants fan so there’s obviously some bias in me
turns31 t1_jbcgx9m wrote
Reply to comment by liger51 in Giants' Daniel Jones lands $160M deal; Saquon Barkley gets tag by BCLetsRide69
I'd say Carr is like 12th best in the league. Jones MIGHT be 20th.
[deleted] t1_jbcc41m wrote
Reply to comment by noonehasthisoneyet in Ravens tag Lamar Jackson after no deal is reached by BCLetsRide69
[removed]
liger51 t1_jbcaa3c wrote
Reply to comment by tommmey in Giants' Daniel Jones lands $160M deal; Saquon Barkley gets tag by BCLetsRide69
Better than Carr???
tommmey t1_jbc37f6 wrote
Reply to comment by TheRoadDog87 in Giants' Daniel Jones lands $160M deal; Saquon Barkley gets tag by BCLetsRide69
As a Giants fan, I also don’t like this deal at this price, but Danny Dimes is better than both Geno and Carr
What annoys me about this deal is that we were essentially negotiating against ourselves and still somehow ended up paying top of the market.
I don’t follow the news that heavily so I’m not sure what that market was for DD but I doubt any team would’ve paid him anywhere close to this amount so why did we? Is there a team that would’ve paid even $120mil / 4 for him?
earic23 t1_jbc0wgp wrote
Reply to comment by herronasaurus_rex in Ravens tag Lamar Jackson after no deal is reached by BCLetsRide69
Unfortunately it’s a bit of both. I think we’ve seen the best that he can do, and he’s only fallen off since then AND he’s now getting injured. Guarantee money is crazy for guy like him
Krogsly t1_jbfef42 wrote
Reply to comment by TheRoadDog87 in Giants' Daniel Jones lands $160M deal; Saquon Barkley gets tag by BCLetsRide69
No, because I think they will be good enough with Daboll and Jones. I think there are a lot of people dogging Jones and this contract and this is the silver lining if they really believe the contract is as bad as they think. All this talk about wasting money on Jones, but the real problems are overpaying a RB, the wasted money on Golladay, and lack of receiving weapons.