Recent comments in /f/springfieldMO

the_honeyman t1_j18pg4u wrote

The difference is a chihuahua bites, lets go, and runs away if you threaten it.

Pitts don't let go. They maul. And they're far more likely to attack than other breeds, due to prey drive, low intelligence, and hundreds of years of selective breeding. Stop trying to "what about" your way around this. Pitts are a dangerous breed and should be treated as such.

20

Top_Tiger_6969 t1_j18mj98 wrote

The way the mls tries to copy the way premier league teams are named is one of many reasons the league is awful. I can’t imagine anything less entertaining then watching guys run around for 90 minutes dropping like a rock at the slightest contact and most of the time not seeing anyone score. Soccer is a terrible sport

−12

suchawildflower t1_j18hljo wrote

I did not make my comment in ignorance, hence "die this time". I'm aware there are several aggressive breeds...however, pits kill or maul to such a severity it requires hospitalization or reconstructive surgical procedures. Atcanybrate, there's a reason so many cities, towns and rentals do not allow pits. They maim, maul and kill.

11

Sk8ordie79 t1_j18e4k7 wrote

Yup. No surprise. It's the highest percentage... does not calculate to "always the pits". Usually the pits, sometimes German Shepherds. In my experience in the real world, constantly interacting with dogs, it's just dogs. I've been bit by Chihuahuas numerous times. Sure they don't cause as much damage but they are terrors. It's 100% about the owners

−19

topflight8000 t1_j18bcoa wrote

Sounds like someone needs to quit telling people about Secret Goth Church. I told them it wouldn't stay secret for long if we let the emo and scene kids in.

3