Recent comments in /f/springfieldMO

-lurkbeforeyouleap- t1_j2lrtkc wrote

Reply to comment by Cloud_Disconnected in two questions: by honeyliz03

Slowing down will only increase the odds of getting rear ended though. They will get more upset if you slow down and they can’t get around you. If they could get around you and they are already tailgating then they will go around you either way whether or not you slow down. If they need to be in your lane because they are turning, again, slowing down will only increase the odds of being rear ended. So…slowing down will more than likely increase your odds of being rear ended. Maintaining your speed is statistically the best option.

−7

Cloud_Disconnected t1_j2lr556 wrote

Reply to comment by -lurkbeforeyouleap- in two questions: by honeyliz03

> until you back off or go around.

Does that not explain it? I want them to back off to a safe distance so they don't rear-end me if I have to stop suddenly for some reason. On a two lane road they can just pass me, which is what they should have done in the first place--I don't camp out in the left lane.

If someone consistently needs to drive 10-15 miles over the limit, then they should be allotting more time for driving in their schedule. Their poor planning is not my problem.

6

-lurkbeforeyouleap- t1_j2lldmr wrote

Reply to comment by Cloud_Disconnected in two questions: by honeyliz03

Serious question for people who relate to #2. Why do this? Why not just keep driving the speed you want and ignore the tailgater? Going slower defeats the purpose you were speeding for in the first place. And it brings the tailgater potentially closer yet.

−9

Moonmeato t1_j2ldjv3 wrote

Haha I always think more or less along the same lines now.

The area would be PERFECT for a Trader Joe's and have sent in multiple requests over the years and nothing. I mean, the nearest TJs in multiple directions are 3 hours away. Geographically alone it's in a prime spot.

They'd make a killing here with their specific stuff and at this point someone has got to be blocking them for TJs to still not be in Springfield.

11

aleakarr t1_j2kv24k wrote

I moved to Springfield from just north of Iowa City. The cost of living here is definitely cheaper, so you will get more bang for your buck here. Iowa City is more progressive and liberal than Springfield, but Springfield is big enough that you can generally find your own pocket of people that think similarly as you. Iowa winters are a draw back for most, but I grew up there and miss the snow!

IC is obnoxiously focused on their Hawkeyes. You have to contend with large amounts of 'sports fans' (think KC Chiefs fans but more concentrated and, yeah, dumber).

Their healthcare system IS much better. They have more options and because U of I is known for its med school they have more up to date docs, imo.

Overall, I would choose Springfield!

4