Recent comments in /f/springfieldMO

[deleted] OP t1_j668dw7 wrote

Oh! I like this question! You’re right, as far as that specific spot, nothing. BUT, it is extremely important because that specific spot decided the foreseeable future of development in “other spots” in Springfield. If I was a developer and witnessed the defeat by a lackluster neighborhood refusing to grow with a city, I would assume my money is no good and take my development elsewhere. It is the same with the other developments Springfield needs. That campaign, that decision, that vote, Bach, turned a page in Springfield’s history and it was not a positive one. That is part of why I shared what Nixa, a wealthy suburb of Springfield, is saying. Everybody looking in is seeing it like I saw that stunt. AND, Bach wants to be Mayor??? Developers will avoid this city like the plague it is and is becoming!

0

Cloud_Disconnected t1_j667p59 wrote

If we're going to relitigate the Galloway issue, I'll ask the same question I asked then: specifically what was the actual benefit of the project to the neighborhood and the city?

I don't mean a avoiding scaring off developers. I mean the actual, measurable benefit of building luxury apartments and self-storage there in that spot, as opposed to a another location.

12

willardharrisupvotes t1_j666mxp wrote

He was a strong advocate for barring homeless people from sleeping on public land. It’s just more of that out of sight-out of mind ideology the GOP pushes. I’m running for his seat in 2024 and will be on the house floor everyday fighting for affordable housing nationwide

7

[deleted] OP t1_j666jpq wrote

Ignoring that Springfield is a cluster fuck fuck, okay. Poorest city in the state. One of the most dangerous cities in the state. One of the highest, if not highest homeless population in the state. Potholes for days. Churches on every corner, almost literally. Chicken for miles. Yet, dOnT ToUcH ThIs HiLl!!! This hill right here. This one in particular. Eek!!! Yeah, Nixa is the clusterfuck.

−17

[deleted] OP t1_j6665ud wrote

How are both ‘wrong’? What makes either ‘wrong’? There is nothing wrong with development. There is nothing wrong with what Gidden’s insinuated. He is correct. Does it make Bach and the balking of ‘Springfielders’ to development destructive? Does his statement that Bach and the fight against developing that particular location in Galloway closed Springfield for business seem plausible? Absolutely. To say it is wrong and Bach correct is laughable. That’s impossible.

−7

[deleted] OP t1_j6658tj wrote

Y’all haven’t had your afternoon nap, I see. I was asking for opinions, not hostility. That sort of supports my thoughts on the matter, that NIMBY state of mind. I’m a transplant and I quite frankly do not understand “Springfielders” nor how a city brimming with opportunity and ability to harness its position in the state and the region can also rank as the state’s poorest? I love this city and I support protecting neighborhoods, but I also believe there must be compromise. Again, I’m asking for a conversation, not rudeness. Thanks!

−3

robzilla71173 t1_j65ryuk wrote

The location was one of the draws for me with white river. It's between where I spend summer nights on my bike and where I live. It just seems like the crowd has diminished somewhat since this all started to come out. It was never huge, it was just a little too far west of the action, but it had a healthy supply of regulars and that seems to have gone down. I've never been to Wire Road, was supposed to go to an event there this week but completely zoned on it. Is that in Battlefield?

8