Recent comments in /f/springfieldMO
Apprehensive_Rip8351 t1_iydnbkp wrote
Reply to comment by StrongPlan3 in Josh Hawley voting against inter racial and same sex marriages by SearchingBleach
The government has to set up some institutions like marriage or else the courts would constantly be clogged with people individually suing to protect their interests. Same goes for a lot of libertarian arguments like getting rid of he EPA.
elevationbrew t1_iydn7b7 wrote
Reply to comment by FrankTankly in Josh Hawley voting against inter racial and same sex marriages by SearchingBleach
Post it. Put your ass on the line.
KSIChancho t1_iydmyqj wrote
Reply to comment by Conscious_Ad7105 in Josh Hawley voting against inter racial and same sex marriages by SearchingBleach
This. And also he probably voted it down based on the same sex thing. How could anyone even legally stop an interracial marriage?
kcintrovert t1_iydmxd7 wrote
Reply to comment by tdawg-1551 in Josh Hawley voting against inter racial and same sex marriages by SearchingBleach
Considering she's married to him in the first place, I doubt there's anything he can do that she doesn't already support or turn a blind eye to.
Apprehensive_Rip8351 t1_iydmw1n wrote
Reply to comment by Low_Tourist in Josh Hawley voting against inter racial and same sex marriages by SearchingBleach
that isn't why. In fact marriage legalizes pedophilia in a lot of cases (missouri was the destination wedding spot of child brides until SVU did an episode about it in like 2018).
MOStateWineGuy t1_iydmmxi wrote
He is the scum of the earth. So is our Secretary of State. Such an embarrassing party. "Christians."
Conscious_Ad7105 t1_iydmkzg wrote
Reply to comment by Apprehensive_Rip8351 in Josh Hawley voting against inter racial and same sex marriages by SearchingBleach
Agreed
FrankTankly t1_iydmh7g wrote
Reply to comment by elevationbrew in Josh Hawley voting against inter racial and same sex marriages by SearchingBleach
Really? Because Hawley responded to a letter from me indicating that he thought that this particular piece of legislation would negatively impact people that hold traditional conservative and religious values.
How’s that square up with what you’ve said? I agree it’s none of the governments business who I marry, which is why they’ve made a law preventing the ability to discriminate based on race or gender.
Sure seems like that’s them staying out of my private life to me.
Apprehensive_Rip8351 t1_iydmg5y wrote
Reply to comment by Conscious_Ad7105 in Josh Hawley voting against inter racial and same sex marriages by SearchingBleach
From what I've seen is the argument is the supreme court isn't going to over turn it so there is no reason to pass a new law. But they said the same thing about abortion.
Bootdaddy247 t1_iydlixo wrote
Reply to comment by Low_Tourist in Los Cabo’s Closing, What’s going in its place? by FryMastur
Oh, interesting. It definitely feels like we're inundated, but that makes sense. I worked for a co-working space in Denver and that model makes so much sense to me. It was a huge building and companies had their pick of exactly the set up and square footage they needed. I only know of one here, but bring on the midsize offices if there's a need!
Evening-Maize-6779 t1_iydlfy5 wrote
Reply to comment by CaptainCimmeria in Speaking of things everyone's seen by Punnchy
oh god i did (if you tell me not to look at something i’m obv going to) and i’m right between grant beach and west central 😭 there are reasons i don’t leave my apartment alone or past sunset
Spackleberry t1_iydl8ee wrote
Reply to comment by elevationbrew in Josh Hawley voting against inter racial and same sex marriages by SearchingBleach
>If that’s what the voters of the state vote for.
Then they would be wrong and should be overridden by Congress.
Low_Tourist t1_iydl5w0 wrote
Reply to comment by Bootdaddy247 in Los Cabo’s Closing, What’s going in its place? by FryMastur
We actually have a shortage of mid-size office space. It's either huge or like, one office. The 1000-2500 sf is in short supply though.
Evening-Maize-6779 t1_iydl24f wrote
Reply to comment by CaptainCimmeria in Speaking of things everyone's seen by Punnchy
oh no 🥺
throwawayyyycuk t1_iydjp5k wrote
Well, yeah, he does have an agenda you know
Fuck josh hawley, and fuck Schmitt too, can’t wait to see what sort of fuckshit that blight does in the senate
[deleted] t1_iydj7b5 wrote
Reply to comment by elevationbrew in Josh Hawley voting against inter racial and same sex marriages by SearchingBleach
[removed]
ladnar016 t1_iydj44p wrote
Reply to comment by decimatetheweak1s in Josh Hawley voting against inter racial and same sex marriages by SearchingBleach
The text of the bill is readily available and short enough that you could have read it in the time you made an unsupported comment - https://www.congress.gov/bill/117th-congress/house-bill/8404/text
[deleted] t1_iydj0xb wrote
Reply to comment by StrongPlan3 in Josh Hawley voting against inter racial and same sex marriages by SearchingBleach
[removed]
Bootdaddy247 t1_iydizq3 wrote
....why on earth does this town need another office complex? Gas stations, churches, carwashes, strip malls, office buildings... And the latter two just sit there! Vacant, with signs of desperation for renters to move in. It's unlike any other place I've lived.
StrongPlan3 t1_iydic71 wrote
Reply to comment by StrongPlan3 in Josh Hawley voting against inter racial and same sex marriages by SearchingBleach
I know English bureaucracy was a poor example. However, it was recent and more transparent than financial events that occur here. We all know the state and it's representatives find ways to exclude themselves from taxes we the people have to pay.
[deleted] t1_iydhx3l wrote
Reply to comment by FrankTankly in Josh Hawley voting against inter racial and same sex marriages by SearchingBleach
[removed]
StrongPlan3 t1_iydhhsm wrote
Reply to comment by MidwayBoy in Josh Hawley voting against inter racial and same sex marriages by SearchingBleach
Another issue that government should have no part in. The crown was excluded from death taxes upon the death of queen Elizabeth because it was depreciate the wealth of the crown. Another example of rules for thee, not for me.
MidwayBoy t1_iydh4yn wrote
Reply to comment by StrongPlan3 in Josh Hawley voting against inter racial and same sex marriages by SearchingBleach
It’s a government issue because of transfer of property upon death and taxes
decimatetheweak1s t1_iydh352 wrote
Reply to comment by Chapos_sub_capt in Josh Hawley voting against inter racial and same sex marriages by SearchingBleach
You know it was all pork. They just name these bills and put something everyone wants/sounds good as the name of the bill….and then fill it with pork.
CrazyAzian99 t1_iydndrn wrote
Reply to comment by StrongPlan3 in Josh Hawley voting against inter racial and same sex marriages by SearchingBleach
Taxes, Social Security Benefits, etc.