Comments

You must log in or register to comment.

opelit t1_isbdq7i wrote

Apple : ok, anyway...

46

Benrok t1_isbeexy wrote

Sure Apple are assholes but this is just a joke.

We have been screaming for years that we need standard chargers so we don't need to buy a new with every single device and reduce e-waste And now Apple actually does something good to try and change ge this they get fined for it?

Fucking stupid if you ask me

−11

Tell-Relative t1_isbfn4g wrote

Ok i get that we hate apple as acompany but i don't get why they are fined

Like they can sell what they want. Don't like it dont buy

−13

jase654 t1_isbhyf9 wrote

19M? Lol. That’s the equivalent of me having to pay someone $.01 over the next 50 years.

125

Aceswift007 t1_isbix2h wrote

Ironically most rechargable ones actually use universal Micro-USB chargers (which most have literally in a drawer somewhere or "the cord box"), unlike Apple and a few others with their unique ports compared to most devices. A vast majority of those do come with a charger for convenience, albeit a cheap one given not many toy companies roll in cash.

Most just use batteries (AA or AAA, most common in households), so I think only a select few toys would ever fall under that law as a violation.

Thank you for coming to my TED Talk

4

corys00 t1_isbj9c6 wrote

Who is worth more Apple or Brasil?

9

epelle9 t1_isbjcmr wrote

I’m pretty sure there must be some law (at least in some countries) that the product you sell must be functional by itself.

A phone is not really functional without a charger, so it could be illegal to sell it without it.

5

oh__you t1_isbjoec wrote

how much cash does apple have on hand again?
oh, right...

3

tuuling t1_isbjox3 wrote

Well. Apple actually supplies a cable with their phones. Those cables plug into standard charging bricks. The newer ones actually come with usbc ends.

I could understand that people are upset when apple wouldnt supply a cable with their phones as thats the unique part.

2

breadexpert69 t1_isbjv14 wrote

“the judge in charge of the case called the non-inclusion of chargers in phone purchases an "abusive practice" that "requires consumers to purchase a second product in order for the first to work." Apple has been at odds with Brazilian authorities over the issue for a while now. In 2021, São Paulo consumer protection agency Procon-SP fined Apple around $2 million for removing the power adapter from the iPhone 12, telling the company that it was in violation of Brazil's Consumer Defense Code.”

Basically, consumer protection rights are different in every country

10

Powered_by_bots t1_isbk0fb wrote

Brazil has a law stating all devices must come with a charger. The government told Apple before selling new iPhones; multiple times. Apple decided not to listen.

So, fuck Apple.

Brazil should of charged them 3 trillion dollars.

5

Aceswift007 t1_isbk0wk wrote

By "unique," I meant more the actual input end of the cord. Pretty much all chargers end with USB-C, but majority of devices had a micro USB for the actual device power input. Apple has a unique one that only works with Apple devices, don't think I've ever seen anything else use their type

1

Snoo_37640 t1_isbkans wrote

Why would they fine them after the fact. Wouldn’t they know beforehand and refuse the sale?

0

Powered_by_bots t1_isbkdi5 wrote

E-waste?

What do you call Apple refusing to adapt USB C on their iPhones when everything else they fucking sell has USB C port to charge?

Answer: Apple believes themselves to be gods & people like you are blind by bullshit.

6

APairOfAirPods t1_isbkh0l wrote

Yea yea, call it green washing all you want but removing the charger was an actually environmentally conscious decision. As well as removing the headphone jack adapter, as most people don’t really need them and it’s fairly cheap if needed. I have two, as well as two pairs of lightning EarPods I really don’t need. I won’t throw them out on principle.

−13

BigWonka t1_isbko3n wrote

I'm not sure you can actually measure a country's value but just for fun, their GDP is 1.9 trillion while Apple was valued at 3 trillion in January

18

[deleted] t1_isbl0e0 wrote

don’t get fooled by them outwardly stating they are “doing good”. if they really were in it for doing good they would have switched to usbc, no they are doing it for profits while pretending to save the environment.

2

FormulaTacoma t1_isbl83c wrote

I always wondered what would happen if apple just pulled out of one of these markets and let the politicians explain to the people why they can’t have an iPhone. It would be chaos

1

Mrepman81 t1_isblc63 wrote

Really think about what you’re saying and how silly this all is. How are you going to sell an electronics product without any way to charge/keep it powered other than to buy an additional item.

I mean if their intent is to cut down on waste and product then at least include a voucher or something to acquire a charger if a customer needs one but to not have one at all as a option is plain ridiculous.

1

azab189 t1_isbld78 wrote

And they gonna slap that fine away because it's nothing for them. It's like going to a dollar store for them

2

Powered_by_bots t1_isbld82 wrote

Must laws don't make sense.

I think issue is Apple blatantly chose disregard Brazil established laws. Apple disrespected Brazil & thought themselves to be above the law.

So, Brazil bitch slap Apple.

5

Bufb88J t1_isbllpj wrote

They’re like, we saved $100 million by just paying the fine. Let’s do it again.

23

TheCozierDaemon t1_isblr1r wrote

One would argue that an average person would expect an electronic product like a cell phone to come with everything it needs to be operated normally. If it doesn't come with a charger, you cannot operate it normally.

It should come with a fucking charger or at least give you an option to opt out if you already have one.

3

_dm_me_ur_tits t1_isblu3z wrote

Compra casada, a product that forces you to buy another product from the same brand - a crime in Brazil

Yes, the fine is not expensive for Apple, but they will be forced to sell phones with chargers around here

25

WayEducational2241 t1_isblzrl wrote

I'm literally a consumer protection lawyer.

This is not the one thing people take issue with there's thousands of regulations in any given country to protect you mf.

Apple knew ahead of time cause they pay 100s of Millions in legal fees for every country and they just decided they don't care.

6

Careful_Algae242 t1_isbm7r4 wrote

Damn, so let me just buy something with no way to charge it if I didn’t already have a charger for it. This definitely isn’t creating more waste by forcing people to buy cheaper poorly made charging products, to which they will buy multiple of instead of only having the one properly made iPhone charger that would last the lifetime of the phone. You just blow in from stupid town?

3

PalestinePapi t1_isbmqle wrote

All these companies cutting costs it's obvious we're heading for a rough patch in the economy

0

TheCozierDaemon t1_isbmtj4 wrote

And one could argue that unless it has a big old DOES NOT COME WITH A CHARGER on the box or whoever is selling you the phone tells you that it doesn't come with a charger it might very well be a surprise that an electronic device that needs to be charged doesn't come with a way to charge it in the box like just about every other piece of consumer electronics out there.

You're basically arguing against consumer protections here, which is always very cool.

2

epelle9 t1_isbmu31 wrote

Lets say I say I will sell you a car.

You buy it from me, pay me, and then once receive the car you realize it comes with no engine. Then I try to sell you the engine for more money.

I can totally see you suing me (and winning) unless I explicitly stated its an incomplete car and requires you to also purchase your own engine (or already have one).

1

peanutbj t1_isbn6pu wrote

GDP isn’t really an apples to apples comparison with a company’s valuation.

According to Reuters, Brazil’s YOY revenue from federal taxes alone (ie not including other sources of revenue) is $33.14B. It’s a bit hard to find hard figures on their total revenue combined with federal taxes

According to Statista, Apple’s 2021 revenue is $365.82B.

7

2lovesFL t1_isbncf5 wrote

In other news prices for iphones in brazil increase in price to cover fines and a charger...

2

Tell-Relative t1_isbnft7 wrote

This is a good example and i agree with you here bc you can't trick or surprise people. But when you can see what's in the box and there is ko trick or surprise here then i have no problem with it

1

breadexpert69 t1_isbnklx wrote

But they are. I live in South America. If you go to the rural areas where people dont even have reliable electricity or even water, one thing they will have are smartphones, and many of them do have iphones.

I dont expect you to believe me, but I live here and see it first hand.

1

intellix t1_isbnpsf wrote

does this mean purchasers of an iPhone get a free charger or is this just money collected by the gov?

0

Tell-Relative t1_isbnqrk wrote

You buy something spend 10 seconds to see whatsin the box . Plus tge employees will tell you and will sell you the charger

And this ain't costumer protection .just politicians and companies playing touch ass

−1

Cyber_Dan t1_isboha2 wrote

A whole 19 million? Gee I hope that trillion-dollar company can afford it...

7

Talifallout t1_isbosep wrote

They pay this fine every year I believe under the pretense that it’s still cheaper than manufacturing chargers to have in the package with the phone

1

waterbed87 t1_isbotjz wrote

Why are you so upset about this exactly? The market is extremely mature and saturated at this point, majority of iPhone sales are going to people who already have iPhones so already have lightning cables, wireless charging, car adapters, etc.

−5

Benrok t1_isbpsew wrote

Agreed. They should ha e change to usb-c awesome ago. I was only referring the double standard of both complaining about including a charger and not including a charger

1

WahooD89 t1_isbrs6p wrote

For those wondering why 19M USD, it’s the equivalent of 100M BRL. For those wondering why it’s 100M BRL and not more, I have no idea lol

1

waterbed87 t1_isbsl8i wrote

Are you outraged Samsung doesn't ship chargers anymore either?

"Samsung believes the removal of earphones and charger plugs from our in-box device packaging can help address the growing e-waste problem and unnecessary duplication of these items."

https://www.samsung.com/uk/support/mobile-devices/why-does-samsung-not-include-a-charger-in-the-box/

It's an environmentally friendly decision that impacts a minority of buyers in both camps. Most people around Reddit seem pretty liberal about telling people to buy electric cars to save the environment but we draw the line on reducing e-waste?

1

MasterFubar t1_isbt2rq wrote

The fine is calculated on past sales. If that value seems small it's because Apple doesn't sell many phones in Brazil, they are too expensive.

This doesn't mean Apple can pay that fine and keep selling phones without a charger, that would be contempt of court, a criminal case instead of the civil case it's now.

4

dqap t1_isbw9fe wrote

If u changed that M to an B and handed them out WAY more often it would actually make a difference.

1

APairOfAirPods t1_isbwpzd wrote

Mind blowing thought, you can buy one for $19 usd. I wouldn’t Recommend buying any other of apples chargers as they’re overpriced. If you didn’t get the memo from the iPhone 12, sorry, but it’s the 14. Samsung made the same move within 6 months. The packaging being much smaller should at least hint at the fact it’s not included, but it’s not like apple wasn’t up front with the change.

2

APairOfAirPods t1_isbxb1x wrote

The lightning connector is a decade old. It’s fairly unlikely you don’t already have one somewhere. I do agree that it was stupid that apple chose to switch to USB-C at the same time as removing the psu without including an adapter, but the USB-C connector has also been standard on android for years, you really had to be living under a rock to not have owned a USB-C charger by now.

1

loopernova t1_isc0c05 wrote

Apples value is supposed to represent the sum of all cash flow to the firm to an indefinite future.

GDP is just a single year. even if it was all years, it’s not the best comparison. It’s very difficult to make a comparison of worth.

1 year Revenue is probably closest to 1 year gdp.

2

misatillo t1_isc6q4a wrote

Honest question: does the phone come with the cable like everywhere else? If so you can use any charger you have lying around. It’s probably normal usb.

Not that I think it’s ok to not sell it with the charger but you’re not forced to buy one from them either.

8

Denslayer t1_isc6qyl wrote

That’s like 2 minutes of revenue

2

Darth-D2 t1_isc8o3z wrote

Isn't it a good thing though if phones are not by default sold with chargers? Most iPhone users have already one or more chargers, so it would be a waste of material and costs to sell new models with another charger by default.

A simple policy that would assure that whoever is buying an iPhone is aware that the phone does not come with a charger and can purchase one if they like should be enough.

4

kolossal t1_isc9id3 wrote

I'm here visiting Sao Paulo and went to the Apple store here just to see wtf is going on. They're selling the new iPhone Pro Max 14 at $2k, base memory, like holy shit.

4

Careful_Algae242 t1_iscabls wrote

I believe you're missing my point. Yes, the market is older for cables now but there is a massive difference in quality between a charging cord you buy on amazon vs an Apple manufactured one. When apple/samsung say they are no longer going to provide cords why would the average person who needs a new one spend 30$ on an official cable? They wouldn't, and as a result, they'll buy multiple 3rd party cables which are of much lower quality, will not last, and be added to the landfills. An apple or Samsung-produced cable will most likely last the entire life of the phone even when abused.

0

buckthestat t1_iscci0c wrote

You have to fine the more than the same fucking amount of adding them. That’s the only way this works. This is the equivalent of their website being down for an hour. Annoying to them, but it’s not gonna change anything.

1

_dm_me_ur_tits t1_iscdswd wrote

It does, yeah

But the principle of compra casada is that the consumer must not require another product from the same brand in order to use a product, so it doesn't matter if the consumer already has a charger

You could plug the USB into a computer, but you could argue that that's bad, since you're gonna get a slower charging speed than actual chargers. That bad experience could coerce the consumer to buy an actual Apple charger

The law protects the consumer, makes sure a company can't force you to buy two of its products. There are only two ways out for Apple, they either put a USB-C on the iPhone, or add the charger back

1

sogdianus t1_iscedm6 wrote

The charger is USB-C, the connector on the phone is Lightning. In Brazil the USB-C/Lightning cable is included so you can plug it into any available charger which use USB-C

7

sogdianus t1_iscetnt wrote

Then the court does not understand technology. You can use any USB-C charger and nobody forces anybody to get the one from Apple. The USB-C/Lightning charging cable is included in Brazil

3

Jockelson t1_ischapv wrote

Yes, but this is Apple, and people need a reason to bash them, no matter how flimsy. I don't know anyone buying a new adapter either. Also Samsung doesn't ship chargers with their phones either, don't hear about them being fined either.

7

1wiseguy t1_iscn17m wrote

Why does anybody, including Brazil, care what accessories Apple provides with a phone?

Was Apple deceptive? Did they show a charger in the picture on the box?

I feel like I'm missing something here.

−1

nautilator44 t1_iscqr7d wrote

19 million is a rounding error for them. Great penalty.

1

Necromancer1423 t1_iscsaqi wrote

So more like a gentle touch rather than a slap

I really wish we could make them pay more, but atleast brazil is going to get some benefits from it

1

RedditNoise1 t1_iscwm0v wrote

19M is like 000.3% of what Apple makes in a minute

0

Rivale t1_iscxhcz wrote

What is that like $1 per iPhone in Brazil? They are just figuring out a number that apple will pay that won’t piss them off.

1

Panopyra t1_isczsov wrote

Drop in the bucket. $19 mil is prob still less than what they would have had to pay if they included chargers

1

Thesheersizeofit t1_isd21ia wrote

That’s not a slap, that’s a hand-job with extra spit. They’ve saved far more than that not supplying them.

1

cazdan255 t1_isdarpd wrote

JFC, less than pennies for them. Remember folks, if the consequence of breaking a law is a fine, all that means is that law is only for the poor.

1

Noisebug t1_isdb73i wrote

Sounds like some politician needed to extort Apple for some money, but not so much money that anyone would care.

1

WillGallis t1_isdeyb5 wrote

Anything electronic that is not made in Brazil is extremely expensive, because the import fees are excessive.

Before COVID, I remember hearing that if you wanted an iPhone over there, it was actually cheaper to fly to Miami (including a hotel stay for a few days) and buy one in the US than it was to buy it in Brazil.

3

OffgridRadio t1_isdfmys wrote

"Slapped"? More like "Apples Balls Were Lightly Tickled with a $19 million fine"

1

OffgridRadio t1_isdfvm7 wrote

It should just come with a coupon for a free charger if they don't want to package one. Some people need them some don't.

1

UnhelpfulMoron t1_isdhex0 wrote

Which is why this ruling makes no sense to me.

They give you the cord which lets you plug into any usb-c power brick. My house has like 5 of them, some apple some not.

I don’t want another. It’s unnecessary e-waste. The planet dammit doesn’t need every single person who purchases an iPhone to be given another bloody piece of e-waste to go with it.

6

BoonGnik22 t1_isdnvd5 wrote

Maybe if that fine was multiplied by 10, it might actually convince Apple to change.

1

hesaidhehadab_gdick t1_isdszza wrote

okay but now imagine you don't have a charging brick just handy at home, they all broke or you had to move to a new place and needed to restart from scratch. Now it becomes an issue of having to buy another product in order to use the thing you already bought.

−1

misatillo t1_isdzwgi wrote

I think it’s bad they don’t include. All I’m saying is that you are not forced to buy one from them. So the consumer don’t require another product from the same brand in order to use the product. We also have that law in the EU and they could never do anything because of what I say.

3

Laymanao t1_ise225u wrote

If the company is fined, it must have broken a law. Is there a law in Brazil stating that chargers must accompany a phone? That is quite random.

1

_summerrain_ t1_ise2p79 wrote

For people who are commenting that 19M is nothing for apple...

Apple can of course pay for that, but it's 19M being lost and going to the trash. This is NEVER good for a company, it doesn't matter how rich the company is.

1

SuppaBunE t1_ise2pzm wrote

That literally what happened to my coworker. She got kick out of her parent hiyse momntook her phone , she buys a new phone, a new samsung, usbc charger cant charge tvw phone now without buying one

2

chsch98 t1_isel17z wrote

They probably saved 100 times that amount by not including chargers lol.

1

Bootes t1_isemztl wrote

This was their argument, although they also switched the cable to USB-C at the same time as removing the power brick. So you can’t use the new cable with your existing chargers.

1

Alphal66 t1_isezbj1 wrote

They besically paid for the right to do that lmao. It comes off more like a fee than a fine

1

MegaRonin t1_isftm4s wrote

Steve Jobs turning in his grave

0

MuminMetal t1_isjb45a wrote

BRAZIL used $19M FINE!

It's not very effective...

1

nirothewolf t1_isk04kv wrote

They should do this to Samsung and all other too. Phone companies need to learn a lesson.

1