Recent comments in /f/technology
merien_nl t1_j6j3ntn wrote
Reply to Electrify America faces more issues as Rivian R1T gets "fried" at station in California by chrisdh79
Rivian is pointing the finger at EA. Shouldn't the car also be protected? Shouldn't it monitor the input and shut of charging if it was out of spec?
ReallyFineWhine t1_j6j3ir5 wrote
Competition is good.
TryHot9052 t1_j6j3gj0 wrote
Reply to comment by veritanuda in /r/Technology Bi-Weekly Tech Support / General Discussion Thread. Have you a tech question or want to discuss tech? by veritanuda
Thank you!
danielravennest t1_j6j3as4 wrote
Reply to comment by kUdtiHaEX in Green steel startup Boston Metal raises $120M for its fossil-free tech by MrMike
Gasoline used in my car's life (215,000 miles so far) - 25,000 kg. Lithium used in a full electric EV - 10 kg. One is much less than the other. Steel in both kinds of cars - about a ton each.
Electricity for EV to drive 215,000 miles in 22 years (my car's age) - about 72,000 kWh. US solar capacity factor - 24.4% (actual average output divided by rated panel capacity). Average power needed to produce that much power in 22 years: 372 Watts. Rated panel capacity needed: 1.52 KW.
Output per panel: 550W from largest US manufacturer rated at 585W but allowing for power loss as the panel ages. So you need about 3 panels. Panel Mass 34.4 kg x 3 = 103.2 kg. Much less than the car, and 250 times less than ICE gasoline needed.
So there aren't zero side effects, but a lot less.
No-Sample-3588 t1_j6j2xb3 wrote
Reply to comment by GetOutOfTheWhey in TikTok CEO to testify before U.S. Congress over security concerns by liquid_deflation
Or Zuckerberg explaining cookies to them
veritanuda OP t1_j6j2vey wrote
Reply to comment by TryHot9052 in /r/Technology Bi-Weekly Tech Support / General Discussion Thread. Have you a tech question or want to discuss tech? by veritanuda
Need to be more specific about your equipment. Write down the models, then ask on /r/HomeNetworking
cannibal_man t1_j6j2k1d wrote
Reply to comment by Unfadable1 in FCC Threatens to Disconnect Twilio for Illegal Robocalls by BasedSweet
You protest too much. Lol, you sound like a Twilio employee being disingenuous here.
When it comes to spam, they gotta play hardball. Not like the old days playing cozy with Ajit Pai.
It's a new FCC now....
ZombieFleshEaters t1_j6j1ws8 wrote
Reply to comment by Geek_King in TikTok CEO to testify before U.S. Congress over security concerns by liquid_deflation
Watching the US congress grapple with technology has been demoralizing to witness.
InadequateUsername t1_j6j1ual wrote
MrDefenseSecretary t1_j6j1ars wrote
Reply to comment by InadequateUsername in Electrify America faces more issues as Rivian R1T gets "fried" at station in California by chrisdh79
Nuclear bombs are a ludicrous amount of energy potential, and if something goes wrong, it goes really wrong.
This is stupid.
LiberalFartsMajor t1_j6j16xv wrote
How Big Tech is using mass layoffs the media to bring workers to heel.
There have been like 80,000 layoffs, that is nothing. There are 10 million job openings right now. The media is hyping layoffs to make it seem like workers are at risk.
Unfadable1 t1_j6j12uy wrote
Reply to comment by cannibal_man in FCC Threatens to Disconnect Twilio for Illegal Robocalls by BasedSweet
You simply don’t understand the issue beyond what you’ve read, so technically your opinion is literally moot, although I hate to say that because obviously arguing opinion at all is mostly a fools errand.
This isn’t a black-and-white issue, but headlines and blogs won’t teach you that, because that’s not engaging, and clicks rule.
Your suggestion is like banning alcohol manufacturers because kids get access through back-channels and drive drunk. Nice making your acquaintance, nonetheless.
FWIW: I don’t use twillio, but know plenty of non-robo-call companies (that have hundreds of thousands of customers who also are) relying heavily on it. It’s as simple as that. 🤷🏿♂️
cannibal_man t1_j6j0v1w wrote
Reply to comment by Unfadable1 in FCC Threatens to Disconnect Twilio for Illegal Robocalls by BasedSweet
Nope. No sympathy for any of them. None, whatsoever.
If anything, their CEOs belong in jail. And they wouldn't be the first.
rushmc1 t1_j6j0tgn wrote
Reply to OpenAI executives say releasing ChatGPT for public use was a last resort after running into multiple hurdles — and they're shocked by its popularity by steviaplath153
"Gee, people want powerful tools with virtually unlimited applications in their lives...who'da thunk it?"
Unfadable1 t1_j6j0qz3 wrote
Reply to comment by Hookstomped in FCC Threatens to Disconnect Twilio for Illegal Robocalls by BasedSweet
Anyone can get around the checks through simple botting. You’re asking to resolve an unsolvable problem by burning the building down.
IMO your personal experience works more as a hindrance than a boon in this exact scenario. Objectively, you’re probably too close to it, tbh.
Dantzig t1_j6j0ew6 wrote
Reply to comment by YeaISeddit in Ford cuts prices on electric Mustang Mach-E, following Tesla's lead by Familiar-Turtle
How is it compared to e.g. a Cubra born or maybe even the model 3 now with the price drop
Dantzig t1_j6j0ahk wrote
Reply to comment by YeaISeddit in Ford cuts prices on electric Mustang Mach-E, following Tesla's lead by Familiar-Turtle
I havent seriously looked at the ID3, but the ID4 didnt even make the short list. When I asked myself “why this car” nothing comes up. The competition is just about on par or better in my view.
Unfadable1 t1_j6j06kf wrote
Reply to comment by cannibal_man in FCC Threatens to Disconnect Twilio for Illegal Robocalls by BasedSweet
I’m not supporting anything, because I’m not taking a biased/jaded/obtuse perspective on the matter, no matter how I feel personally about robocalls.
See the difference?
GreatBigJerk t1_j6j01xh wrote
Reply to comment by EmbarrassedHelp in OpenAI executives say releasing ChatGPT for public use was a last resort after running into multiple hurdles — and they're shocked by its popularity by steviaplath153
It's extremely unlikely that regular people will be able to run anything close to as good as ChatGPT for several years. Language models are far more resource hungry than things like Stable Diffusion.
NoUtimesinfinite t1_j6j00k1 wrote
Reply to comment by EmbarrassedHelp in OpenAI executives say releasing ChatGPT for public use was a last resort after running into multiple hurdles — and they're shocked by its popularity by steviaplath153
The problem isnt training. If initial upfront cost was the only barrier then yes a free version would eventually pop up. The problem is that each query costs a lot, something that cannot be made up by ad rev so anyone running the servers will require money to run it.
lilbro93 t1_j6izpop wrote
Reply to OpenAI executives say releasing ChatGPT for public use was a last resort after running into multiple hurdles — and they're shocked by its popularity by steviaplath153
>If you're surprised how quickly ChatGPT has taken off, you're not alone. Even executives at OpenAI, the company behind the viral chatbot, are shocked by its popularity.
>In a Fortune article published Wednesday, executives at the company said they weren't sure what to expect when they released it in November.
>"I'll admit that I was on the side of, like, I don't know if this is going to work," OpenAI co-founder and president Greg Brockman told Fortune. Mira Murati, OpenAI's chief technology officer, added to Fortune, "This was definitely surprising."
>Brockman told the magazine that the idea to release ChatGPT for public use a few months ago was a bit of a last resort after OpenAI ran into some initial hurdles with the AI chatbot. For one thing, beta testers didn't know what to ask ChatGPT about in the first place, Brockman told Fortune, and an effort to create chatbots that were experts in certain areas flopped.
>In the end, ChatGPT amassed more than 1 million users in the first five days since its release, according to Sam Altman, the CEO of OpenAI.
>Altman has cautioned, however, that for all of its possible benefits, artificial intelligence can be susceptible to dangerous misuses.
>"The bad case — and I think this is important to say — is like lights out for all of us," Altman said in a recent interview with StrictlyVC's Connie Loizos. "I'm more worried about an accidental misuse case in the short term...So I think it's like impossible to overstate the importance of AI safety and alignment work. I would like to see much, much more happening."
GetOutOfTheWhey t1_j6izfrn wrote
Reply to Electrify America faces more issues as Rivian R1T gets "fried" at station in California by chrisdh79
>but their technician took 7 hours to arrive and was unable to diagnose the problem and remove the charging cable. The technician was so befuddled that he even suggested sawing it off.
I hope they didnt get electrocuted
Treesgivemewood t1_j6izdf3 wrote
Reply to comment by guava_eternal in U.S. No Fly list shared on a hacking forum, government investigating by biendi
Asking the real questions
[deleted] t1_j6iz05y wrote
Reply to Banning TikTok Won’t Do Much Good by Witty-Village-2503
[removed]
Witty-Village-2503 OP t1_j6j3sti wrote
Reply to comment by merien_nl in Banning TikTok Won’t Do Much Good by Witty-Village-2503
Easy, Facebook is an American company that spies for the American government. Tiktok is a direct competitor, so the US gov is seeking a ban to protect Facebook.
Why else would Facebook be paying a republican firm to spread misinformation about tiktok?
Facebook funded anti-TikTok campaign through GOP firm