Recent comments in /f/technology
danielravennest t1_j6j7brn wrote
Reply to comment by Zebo91 in Green steel startup Boston Metal raises $120M for its fossil-free tech by MrMike
Electric arc furnaces are for remelting scrap iron to make new steel. About half of US steel production is remelted scrap. The other half has to come from a "reduction" furnace that removes oxygen from iron ore. Historically this was a blast furnace, but Boston Metal has a different process.
mediandude t1_j6j74x4 wrote
Reply to comment by PLEASE_PUNCH_MY_FACE in Finland Most Resistant to ‘Fake News,’ Report Finds by Wagamaga
Julge pealehakkamine on pool võitu = a bold hacking of heads is half the victory.
hakkame peale = let's get started (hacking heads)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hakkapeliitta
neoplastic_pleonasm t1_j6j72be wrote
Reply to comment by EmbarrassedHelp in OpenAI executives say releasing ChatGPT for public use was a last resort after running into multiple hurdles — and they're shocked by its popularity by steviaplath153
The ChatGPT model is in the neighborhood of 750GB, so sadly we won't be seeing anything remotely as capable that can run on consumer hardware any time soon.
Ivanoff91 t1_j6j6t4j wrote
That is some family suv, not a mustang
danielravennest t1_j6j6kfg wrote
Reply to comment by LukeMayeshothand in Green steel startup Boston Metal raises $120M for its fossil-free tech by MrMike
If the question was "how can I get really expensive electricity in 14 years", then yes nuclear is the answer. 14 years is the Vogtle 3 & 4 reactors in Georgia, approved in 2009, supposed to be operational this year.
shinra528 t1_j6j6h40 wrote
Reply to comment by Adiwik in OpenAI executives say releasing ChatGPT for public use was a last resort after running into multiple hurdles — and they're shocked by its popularity by steviaplath153
It’s already available to the public for free. You just need $20M in hardware to power it.
danielravennest t1_j6j66zg wrote
Reply to comment by londons_explorer in Green steel startup Boston Metal raises $120M for its fossil-free tech by MrMike
The energy of formation of Iron III Oxide is 5.16 MJ/kg or 1433 kWh/ton. Actual energy needed depends on the efficiency of the process, including heat losses.
Wholesale solar and wind range from $26-50/MWh x 1.433 MWh/ton = $37-72/ton. Since steel goes for ~$750/ton these days, power cost is not a show-stopper at reasonable efficiency.
[deleted] t1_j6j64uf wrote
Reply to comment by Heres_your_sign in How Big Tech is using mass layoffs to bring workers to heel by diacewrb
[deleted]
parlapier t1_j6j62et wrote
Reply to comment by YachtingChristopher in Dreams for the tech sector’s rout: The end of founder worship, and a reset of toxic startup values by Hrmbee
What part of that money goes to the workers who actually built Spotify?
jeffreyshran t1_j6j5xus wrote
Cue the Pam "they're the same thing" meme from the office.
OtheDreamer t1_j6j5r9y wrote
Reply to OpenAI executives say releasing ChatGPT for public use was a last resort after running into multiple hurdles — and they're shocked by its popularity by steviaplath153
Older versions of ChatGPT such as those on r/SubSimulatorGPT2 or r/SubSimGPT2Interactive are still full of golden nuggets of AI wisdom. I'm not surprised at all that if you give someone an easy enough interface for a sandbox, people are going to want to play in it.
PedroEglasias t1_j6j5jb4 wrote
Reply to comment by steviaplath153 in OpenAI executives say releasing ChatGPT for public use was a last resort after running into multiple hurdles — and they're shocked by its popularity by steviaplath153
> fuck all of you over
So are they supposed to pay their developers in people's charity?
edit. lol Reddit is all about fair wages until it comes to a service they're enjoying, that they want to keep using for free.....
They have huge hardware costs, lots of very high skilled employees etc...
aneeta96 t1_j6j5enb wrote
Reply to comment by steviaplath153 in OpenAI executives say releasing ChatGPT for public use was a last resort after running into multiple hurdles — and they're shocked by its popularity by steviaplath153
What charity?
People were either curious or saw a way it could help them. No one tried it out just because they thought it would help the nice company.
As for the rest, AI is not going away. That genie left the bottle years ago. The biggest companies in the world have been dumping billions into the tech. It is going to change society and some folks will be better off for it and some will not be. Nothing new here.
Vote_nihilist t1_j6j54gj wrote
Lol, I’m just laughing at everyone that seemed to think these corporations were better than any others. Welcome to the real world!
GreatBigJerk t1_j6j4pap wrote
Reply to Ubuntu Pro enters general availability by Doener23
The free tier thing seems like a pretty good thing for regular people. Is vanilla Ubuntu still popular? Most of the I've looked around, it seems better to use a distro built on Ubuntu like Mint, Pop OS, etc...
GeorgeHayward t1_j6j4gkr wrote
Thank you fam. Saying no to doing that test was the easiest decision of my career fam. The Lord Always Delivers! All data scientists in the world will back me up on this one.
[deleted] t1_j6j4bov wrote
Reply to comment by xal1124 in Electrify America faces more issues as Rivian R1T gets "fried" at station in California by chrisdh79
[removed]
Mr_ToDo t1_j6j481z wrote
Reply to comment by Ronny_Jotten in Microsoft, GitHub, and OpenAI ask court to throw out AI copyright lawsuit by Tooskee
Well, they did both in that paper. But it would be interesting to know what the ones at the top were from. I know that there's one I saw further down in high hit percents further down but with as nice as they are I don't know why the rest don't if they belong to that model.
SarahVeraVicky t1_j6j470q wrote
Reply to comment by Malbranch in Microsoft, GitHub, and OpenAI ask court to throw out AI copyright lawsuit by Tooskee
> According to open source, that's impossible, you can't pirate open source code
I would assume pirating open source code would be using the code against its licensing. Yeah, I know, it's weird, but open source code in some cases (like GPL licensed code) can't just be added to a product and compiled without additional steps. If the open-source license used explicitly states you have to give the same license and rights to open source the code to other people and you commercially closed-source it, it would be an issue.
Since this removes the whole "show license before giving code", well... I could see a reason for a lawsuit being problematic to some. Who knows, most people would rather just take the code and use it, rather than deal with respecting copyrights/copyleft licenses.
[deleted] t1_j6j46yc wrote
Reply to comment by YeaISeddit in Philips to cut 13% of jobs in safety and profitability drive by 4Wf2n5
[deleted]
tomistruth t1_j6j42vb wrote
American politics is a charade.
The rich are running jokes on the people telling them whom to hate and what to think to distract from the real problem avoid real change.
Tiktok does just about the same thing that internet giants like google, facebook or even apple are doing. Google scans all your email attachments and reads all your emails. Facebook scans all your msg and images. Apple recently activated mandatory facial and body scanning on all photos.
The only reason Tiktok is in the news is because it is made by a foreign adversary. A hostile nation. Bytedance, the company running Tiktok is majority owned by the Chinese military.
But the real problem, that NOBODY is talking about is the lack of privacy and data protection for web.
If the US government would pass laws protecting the data and privacy of its citizen, then there would be no problem to begin with. If the apps are not allowed to access critical device and personal information automatically to begin with, no apps could be spy on you to begin with.
But then the government could not mass surveil its citizens anymore.
The argument that criminals or terrorists could use those privacy loopholes to commit crimes is a hoax.
They ALREADY use their own hardware with their own operating systems.
Mass surveillance is per definition for the masses, which means its citizens. It never was about criminals to begin with.
Fix those damn privacy laws and pass data protection laws to give EVERYBODY privacy, instead of those the criminals and terrorists.
End exploitive data mining and privacy abuse and increase privacy protection, so internet giants can't force consumes to agree to mandatory data sharing to use their service.
[deleted] t1_j6j3xxc wrote
Reply to comment by LiberalFartsMajor in How Big Tech is using mass layoffs to bring workers to heel by diacewrb
[removed]
[deleted] t1_j6j3xbj wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in New 13th-gen Intel Core desktop CPUs are handing out cores to everyone by Vailhem
[removed]
SeniorJuniorDev t1_j6j3w0n wrote
Reply to comment by DirkBabypunch in FCC Threatens to Disconnect Twilio for Illegal Robocalls by BasedSweet
Radio DJs sweating
[deleted] t1_j6j7f48 wrote
Reply to comment by digiorno in How Big Tech is using mass layoffs to bring workers to heel by diacewrb
[deleted]