Recent comments in /f/technology
jlaw54 t1_j6jwdjn wrote
Reply to comment by steviaplath153 in OpenAI executives say releasing ChatGPT for public use was a last resort after running into multiple hurdles — and they're shocked by its popularity by steviaplath153
Are you taking the position that ChatGPT isn’t useful?
jlaw54 t1_j6jw73b wrote
Reply to comment by steviaplath153 in OpenAI executives say releasing ChatGPT for public use was a last resort after running into multiple hurdles — and they're shocked by its popularity by steviaplath153
It’s free. We are the product. We all know this having seen the fact that anything free means we are the product. It is known.
[deleted] t1_j6jw3ej wrote
Reply to comment by SuperSecretAgentMan in Facebook secretly killed users batteries, worker claims in lawsuit by tyteen4a03
[deleted]
JustAnOrdinaryBloke t1_j6jw024 wrote
Reply to comment by DrQuantum in ChatGPT is on its way to becoming a virtual doctor, lawyer, and business analyst. Here's a list of advanced exams the AI bot has passed so far. by rationalworld
Yes, but they generally remain idiots for life. A computer system could potentially improve over time.
[deleted] t1_j6jvyue wrote
Reply to comment by brettmjohnson in How Big Tech is using mass layoffs to bring workers to heel by diacewrb
[deleted]
WailersOnTheMoon t1_j6jvydk wrote
Reply to comment by SuperSecretAgentMan in Facebook secretly killed users batteries, worker claims in lawsuit by tyteen4a03
This is incredibly obnoxious. I’m still on Facebook because we don’t live near our families and our kids’ schools and teams use it to communicate, and any time I’m on Facebook it shuts down Spotify, which wouldn’t be as terrible if any notifications I received after that point weren’t deafeningly loud.
twistedLucidity t1_j6jvbn1 wrote
Reply to comment by ottoottootto in Ubuntu Pro enters general availability by Doener23
> Snaps feel like an unfinished feature.
Snaps break basic functionality, they're infuriating.
slinkwc2k t1_j6jurew wrote
Threats without action are just empty words…DO IT…
Hookstomped t1_j6juj93 wrote
Reply to comment by Unfadable1 in FCC Threatens to Disconnect Twilio for Illegal Robocalls by BasedSweet
Listen Telephony isn’t new, offering it to the world through an open API with free credits to enable developers causes this problem within the ecosystem. Twilio is an abstraction layer on top of actual telecom infrastructure. There are 100’s of companies that operate in this space with far less TCPA complaints/violations.
To your misguided and uniformed metaphor, this is more similar to putting a sign up in your front yard that you’re not home and leaving the back door to your house open, and then wondering why dirty mike and the boys turned it into a fuck shack.
Nerdenator t1_j6ju9xy wrote
Better idea:
Force ByteDance to take on an American partner in operating TikTok in the US. All data must be handled on servers hosted by this partner purely in the United States, for a "nominal" fee. ByteDance must open up its source code to inspection by this partner and any US government agency that wants to see it, at will, no questions asked. The US government may halt the use of their service at any time for any reason, with or without an appeals process. Ideally, Canada, Australia, New Zealand, the UK, and EU take up the same regime.
This is basically the bar set by the CCP for Westerners to operate within PRC; turnabout is fair play.
618smartguy t1_j6ju9t0 wrote
Reply to comment by Velgus in FCC Threatens to Disconnect Twilio for Illegal Robocalls by BasedSweet
>They seem to think that Twilio exclusively works with/for these spam robocall farms - your prohibition analogy is a good one.
What's giving you this impression? I have no problem thinking a business should be shut down if they are massively profiting off unethical behavior, regardless of what else they are doing. Who cares if they are doing good too? Seems to me like their good deeds are actually bad deeds if ultimately they are allowed to continue operating based on the argument you are presenting.
HackSlashBurn t1_j6jtzau wrote
Reply to comment by AdRelevant3167 in U.S. No Fly list shared on a hacking forum, government investigating by biendi
This. I don’t know what they’re going to ‘investigate’.
Zebo91 t1_j6jtenz wrote
Reply to comment by danielravennest in Green steel startup Boston Metal raises $120M for its fossil-free tech by MrMike
Thanks for making the distinction.
Purple_CASH t1_j6jt65n wrote
2 good videos explaining things and why this matters for setting precedent for future AI projects.
Shorter video:
Lawyer Explains Stable Diffusion Lawsuit (Major Implications!)
Follow up longer video:
New Lawsuits Threaten A.i. Art (Could be Major!) | Corridor Cast EP#163
Nerdenator t1_j6jt56b wrote
Reply to Banning TikTok Won’t Do Much Good by Witty-Village-2503
I think it'd just be fair play.
Most Western countries have to give a ton of local control over to Chinese companies (read: the CCP) in order to access the Chinese market. Those that don't play ball or threaten the iron-fisted political status quo, don't get to make money in China.
When the Chinese start having to do the same thing to get into the West, they might realize how abusive this practice is.
skilliard7 t1_j6jt2fo wrote
Reply to comment by JPMoney81 in Philips to cut 13% of jobs in safety and profitability drive by 4Wf2n5
Philips stock is down 70% in the past 2 years.... their stock was worth more in 1997 than it is today. How much do you expect shareholders to lose just to maintain jobs that aren't providing more value than they cost?
dbneo t1_j6jsyim wrote
Didn't they say. they wanna focus on Nothing Phone 1 first?
steviaplath153 OP t1_j6jsjvb wrote
Reply to comment by perspicat8 in OpenAI executives say releasing ChatGPT for public use was a last resort after running into multiple hurdles — and they're shocked by its popularity by steviaplath153
The ones who pressed a button, using the knowledge of others that they copy and pasted, letting machine learning algorithms train themselves on our data, are genius inventors that should reap the rewards of everyone's work/data? Nope. Try again.
azurleaf t1_j6js4p7 wrote
Reply to comment by Geek_King in TikTok CEO to testify before U.S. Congress over security concerns by liquid_deflation
Having watched congress grill Google / Facebook in the past, this is pretty much exactly what happened.
foundafreeusername t1_j6jrvym wrote
Reply to comment by steviaplath153 in OpenAI executives say releasing ChatGPT for public use was a last resort after running into multiple hurdles — and they're shocked by its popularity by steviaplath153
>Now watch as they use your charity to attempt to replace and fuck all of you over.
the American Dream
MrBigWaffles t1_j6jrmjr wrote
Reply to comment by Elliott2 in OpenAI executives say releasing ChatGPT for public use was a last resort after running into multiple hurdles — and they're shocked by its popularity by steviaplath153
>get rid of tons of tedious stuff
I don't think you realize how many people have jobs that revolve around doing "tons of tedious stuff"
elzissou710 t1_j6jrdv6 wrote
Just cut them off already. Good lord I’m starting to think US lawmakers have a stake in these companies.
perspicat8 t1_j6jr9b7 wrote
Reply to comment by steviaplath153 in OpenAI executives say releasing ChatGPT for public use was a last resort after running into multiple hurdles — and they're shocked by its popularity by steviaplath153
The ones who invented the stuff you mean?
It’s kinda how the world works.
Let me add naive to the charge.
steviaplath153 OP t1_j6jq9wm wrote
Reply to comment by perspicat8 in OpenAI executives say releasing ChatGPT for public use was a last resort after running into multiple hurdles — and they're shocked by its popularity by steviaplath153
Not as cynical as the small group of people who plan to hoard and charge for the benefits of AI.
Nasmix t1_j6jwj1c wrote
Reply to comment by skilliard7 in Philips to cut 13% of jobs in safety and profitability drive by 4Wf2n5
Technically we are not in a recession - a slowing economy yes, but not recessionary - at least not as of now